[KJ] Re: bitkeeper tree for kjt patchset?

[KJ] Re: bitkeeper tree for kjt patchset?

[Domen Puncer]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1505 bytes --]

On 14/12/04 14:29 -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> 
> What do you think of a bk repository for kjt? I did a search and i
> didn't see anything related with this topic, am i missing something ?

I don't have any "religion" problems with bk, but I also don't see
advantages. I doubt many would want to clone kj-bk tree, as there
is not much improvements (like driver for latest card, or something).
But feel free to show me advantages, I might consider using bk.

> 
> Reading all recent -mm announces we see that Andrew is merging acpi,
> agpgart, arm, cifs and others bk trees. I think that he can merge bk-kjt
> too and we'll see more testing of these patches posted at this list. 

As Randy noted, same could be done with patches.
Also note... those trees you mention come from maintainers, but kj
patches need to get TO maintainers.

> 
> Actually, the kjt 'release process' is post the patchset to lkml when
> kjt maintainer feels that it's ok, no? IMO, it can be done the same way
> but asking for Andrew merge bk-kjt before release -mm kernels adding
> there (bk-kjt) only reviewed patches posted at this list. Comments?
> 
> If you think that it's a good idea and there's no server to setup it
> (and i guess that bkbits won't be a problem), i can host it atm.
> 
> Hope that helps,
> Gustavo Franco -- <stratus@acm.org>
> 
> 

> _______________________________________________
> Kernel-janitors mailing list
> Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org
> http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 167 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org
http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors