All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@engr.sgi.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>,
	linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cu, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add legacy I/O and memory access routines to /proc/bus/pci API
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 17:00:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200412150900.18890.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1103101057.6246.19.camel@gaston>

On Wednesday, December 15, 2004 12:57 am, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > I think by "legacy I/O space", you mean specifically "legacy
> > I/O *port* space", right?  Maybe there's no current use for it,
> > but I can imagine supporting MMIO accesses this way, too.
>
> Legacy IO ports, there should be one space per PCI domain. There is also
> legacy ISA memory space though on some ppc's, this doesn't exist at all.
> I suspect we want to expose both in a way.

This interface exports both.

> > On i386, anyway ;-)  But on ia64, we support multiple 64k I/O port
> > spaces (one of them being the 0-64K space that corresponds to the
> > i386 "legacy" space).  Shouldn't we be able to access them with this
> > interface, too?
>
> We should imho. On ppc, we have a 64k space per domain. One of the main
> set of HW that has use for these are VGA cards. It's perfectly possible
> to have a Mac with an AGP card in the AGP port and a PCI video card in
> one of hte PCI slots, and those are on 2 different domains with
> different legacy (0...64k) IO spaces.
>
> We defininitely want whatever interface we define to deal with that.

Good, because that's exactly what it does.  The arch is responsible for 
returning the legacy I/O port or legacy ISA memory base address given a 
pci_dev, which is used as a base for the page offset passed into mmap.  So 
e.g. mmap(..., 0xa0000) after doing ioctl(fd, PCIIOC_MMAP_IS_LEGACY_MEM, ...) 
would get you the VGA framebuffer for the device corresponding to 'fd'.

> There is some work done by Jon Smirl in this area (a VGA access
> arbitration driver).

I think Dave Airlie did a version of the vga class driver, and the backend 
used for /proc/bus/pci could be used for both drivers.  I'm 
using /proc/bus/pci because it's available now and nearly good enough (i.e. 
this patch was all I needed to get going).

Anyway, I'll post another version with Bjorn's suggestion about the ioctl for 
choosing config or legacy I/O port read/writes, since it looks like the rest 
of your concerns are dealt with.

Thanks,
Jesse

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@engr.sgi.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>,
	linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cu, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add legacy I/O and memory access routines to /proc/bus/pci API
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 09:00:18 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200412150900.18890.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1103101057.6246.19.camel@gaston>

On Wednesday, December 15, 2004 12:57 am, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > I think by "legacy I/O space", you mean specifically "legacy
> > I/O *port* space", right?  Maybe there's no current use for it,
> > but I can imagine supporting MMIO accesses this way, too.
>
> Legacy IO ports, there should be one space per PCI domain. There is also
> legacy ISA memory space though on some ppc's, this doesn't exist at all.
> I suspect we want to expose both in a way.

This interface exports both.

> > On i386, anyway ;-)  But on ia64, we support multiple 64k I/O port
> > spaces (one of them being the 0-64K space that corresponds to the
> > i386 "legacy" space).  Shouldn't we be able to access them with this
> > interface, too?
>
> We should imho. On ppc, we have a 64k space per domain. One of the main
> set of HW that has use for these are VGA cards. It's perfectly possible
> to have a Mac with an AGP card in the AGP port and a PCI video card in
> one of hte PCI slots, and those are on 2 different domains with
> different legacy (0...64k) IO spaces.
>
> We defininitely want whatever interface we define to deal with that.

Good, because that's exactly what it does.  The arch is responsible for 
returning the legacy I/O port or legacy ISA memory base address given a 
pci_dev, which is used as a base for the page offset passed into mmap.  So 
e.g. mmap(..., 0xa0000) after doing ioctl(fd, PCIIOC_MMAP_IS_LEGACY_MEM, ...) 
would get you the VGA framebuffer for the device corresponding to 'fd'.

> There is some work done by Jon Smirl in this area (a VGA access
> arbitration driver).

I think Dave Airlie did a version of the vga class driver, and the backend 
used for /proc/bus/pci could be used for both drivers.  I'm 
using /proc/bus/pci because it's available now and nearly good enough (i.e. 
this patch was all I needed to get going).

Anyway, I'll post another version with Bjorn's suggestion about the ioctl for 
choosing config or legacy I/O port read/writes, since it looks like the rest 
of your concerns are dealt with.

Thanks,
Jesse

  reply	other threads:[~2004-12-15 17:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-12-14 17:41 [PATCH] add legacy I/O and memory access routines to /proc/bus/pci API Jesse Barnes
2004-12-14 17:41 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-12-14 23:55 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2004-12-14 23:55   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2004-12-15  0:11   ` Jesse Barnes
2004-12-15  0:11     ` Jesse Barnes
2004-12-15  3:06     ` Jesse Barnes
2004-12-15  3:06       ` Jesse Barnes
2004-12-15  8:57   ` [PATCH] add legacy I/O and memory access routines to Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-12-15  8:57     ` [PATCH] add legacy I/O and memory access routines to /proc/bus/pci API Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-12-15 17:00     ` Jesse Barnes [this message]
2004-12-15 17:00       ` Jesse Barnes
2004-12-16 14:55       ` [PATCH] add legacy I/O and memory access routines to Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-12-16 14:55         ` [PATCH] add legacy I/O and memory access routines to /proc/bus/pci API Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-12-16 16:26         ` Jesse Barnes
2004-12-16 16:26           ` Jesse Barnes
2004-12-15 17:27 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-12-15 17:27   ` Jesse Barnes
2004-12-15 21:03   ` Andreas Dilger
2004-12-15 21:03     ` Andreas Dilger
2004-12-15 23:15     ` Jesse Barnes
2004-12-15 23:15       ` Jesse Barnes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200412150900.18890.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com \
    --to=jbarnes@engr.sgi.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.