* [PATCH 2.4 0/18]: Netfilter resync with 2.6
@ 2004-12-20 7:14 Patrick McHardy
2004-12-21 0:55 ` David S. Miller
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Patrick McHardy @ 2004-12-20 7:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David S. Miller; +Cc: netfilter-devel
Hi Dave,
the following 18 patches resync netfilter in 2.4 with 2.6.
They contains the ICMP+NAT fixes, Yasuyuki's IPv6 fixes
and two misc. fixes.
You can pull all changes from bk://212.42.230.204/nf-2.4
Regards
Patrick
Patrick McHardy:
o Merge coreworks.de:/home/kaber/src/nf/nf-2.4-misc into
coreworks.de:/home/kaber/src/nf/nf-2.4
o Merge coreworks.de:/home/kaber/src/nf/nf-2.4-nat into
coreworks.de:/home/kaber/src/nf/nf-2.4
o Merge coreworks.de:/home/kaber/src/nf/nf-2.4-ip6tables into
coreworks.de:/home/kaber/src/nf/nf-2.4
o [NETFILTER]: Fix stack leakage in iptables/ip6_tables
o [NETFILTER]: Release dst_entry in PRE_ROUTING after NAT
o [NETFILTER]: Verify NAT manips have been applied before reversing
them in icmp_reply_translation
o [NETFILTER]: Apply PRE_ROUTING manips in LOCAL_OUT for locally
generated icmp errors
o [NETFILTER]: Save a level of indentation in icmp_reply_translation
o [NETFILTER]: Remove CONFIG_IP_NF_NAT_LOCAL config option
o [NETFILTER]: Associate locally generated ICMP errors with conntrack
of original packet
Phil Oester:
o [NETFILTER]: revert MASQUERADE optimization for mostly static IPs
Yasuyuki Kozakai:
o [NETFILTER]: Backport fixes for ip6tables
o [NETFILTER]: Backport fixes for ip6t_rt
o [NETFILTER]: Backport fixes for ip6t_multiport
o [NETFILTER]: Backport fixes for ip6t_ipv6header
o [NETFILTER]: Backport fixes for ip6t_hbh
o [NETFILTER]: Backport fixes for ip6t_frag
o [NETFILTER]: Backport fixes for ip6t_eui64
o [NETFILTER]: Fix check for ESP header size in ip6t_esp
o [NETFILTER]: Backport fixes for ip6t_dst
o [NETFILTER]: Backport fixes for ip6t_LOG
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2.4 0/18]: Netfilter resync with 2.6
2004-12-20 7:14 [PATCH 2.4 0/18]: Netfilter resync with 2.6 Patrick McHardy
@ 2004-12-21 0:55 ` David S. Miller
2004-12-21 9:41 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-12-22 8:37 ` Patrick McHardy
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: David S. Miller @ 2004-12-21 0:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Patrick McHardy; +Cc: netfilter-devel
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 08:14:03 +0100
Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> wrote:
> the following 18 patches resync netfilter in 2.4 with 2.6.
> They contains the ICMP+NAT fixes, Yasuyuki's IPv6 fixes
> and two misc. fixes.
>
> You can pull all changes from bk://212.42.230.204/nf-2.4
Please don't put things like the Bitkeeper/etc/config changeset
in your tree. I can't pull in changes like that.
Unfortunately, I can't even "bk undo -r" that bogus change since
it's not at the tip of the tree. And I don't want to "bk cset -x"
the changeset since that leaves the history of this crap in there.
Can you put together a clean tree without the Bitkeeper/etc/config
change in it? Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2.4 0/18]: Netfilter resync with 2.6
2004-12-21 0:55 ` David S. Miller
@ 2004-12-21 9:41 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-12-21 8:36 ` David S. Miller
2004-12-22 8:37 ` Patrick McHardy
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Patrick McHardy @ 2004-12-21 9:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David S. Miller; +Cc: netfilter-devel
David S. Miller wrote:
> Please don't put things like the Bitkeeper/etc/config changeset
> in your tree. I can't pull in changes like that.
>
> Unfortunately, I can't even "bk undo -r" that bogus change since
> it's not at the tip of the tree. And I don't want to "bk cset -x"
> the changeset since that leaves the history of this crap in there.
Oops, sorry, I can't even remeber when I put this in.
>
> Can you put together a clean tree without the Bitkeeper/etc/config
> change in it? Thanks.
Sure, but it might take a few days.
Regards
Patrick
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2.4 0/18]: Netfilter resync with 2.6
2004-12-21 0:55 ` David S. Miller
2004-12-21 9:41 ` Patrick McHardy
@ 2004-12-22 8:37 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-12-28 5:33 ` David S. Miller
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Patrick McHardy @ 2004-12-22 8:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David S. Miller; +Cc: netfilter-devel
David S. Miller wrote:
> Can you put together a clean tree without the Bitkeeper/etc/config
> change in it? Thanks.
I've put together a new tree without the config change at
bk://212.42.230.204/nf-2.4
Regards
Patrick
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2.4 0/18]: Netfilter resync with 2.6
2004-12-22 8:37 ` Patrick McHardy
@ 2004-12-28 5:33 ` David S. Miller
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: David S. Miller @ 2004-12-28 5:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Patrick McHardy; +Cc: netfilter-devel
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 09:37:53 +0100
Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> wrote:
> David S. Miller wrote:
> > Can you put together a clean tree without the Bitkeeper/etc/config
> > change in it? Thanks.
>
> I've put together a new tree without the config change at
> bk://212.42.230.204/nf-2.4
Pulled, thanks a lot Patrick.
I'll push this on to Marcelo this evening.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-12-28 5:33 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-12-20 7:14 [PATCH 2.4 0/18]: Netfilter resync with 2.6 Patrick McHardy
2004-12-21 0:55 ` David S. Miller
2004-12-21 9:41 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-12-21 8:36 ` David S. Miller
2004-12-22 8:37 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-12-28 5:33 ` David S. Miller
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.