All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jose R. Santos" <jrsantos@austin.ibm.com>
To: "Jose R. Santos" <jrsantos@austin.ibm.com>
Cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
	"Martin J. Bligh" <Martin.Bligh@us.ibm.com>,
	Brent Casavant <bcasavan@sgi.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] NUMA boot hash allocation interleaving
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 16:56:29 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041220165629.GA21231@rx8.austin.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041216141814.GA10292@rx8.austin.ibm.com>

Jose R. Santos <jrsantos@austin.ibm.com> [041216]:
> I can do the SpecSFS runs but each runs takes several hours to complete
> and I would need to do two runs (baseline and patched).  I may have it 
> ready by today or tommorow.

The difference between the two runs was with in noise of the benchmark on
my small setup.  I wont be able to get a larger NUMA system until next year,
so I'll retest when that happens.  In the mean time, I don't see a reason
either to stall this patch, but that may change on I get numbers on a
larger system.

-JRS

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Jose R. Santos" <jrsantos@austin.ibm.com>
To: "Jose R. Santos" <jrsantos@austin.ibm.com>
Cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
	"Martin J. Bligh" <Martin.Bligh@us.ibm.com>,
	Brent Casavant <bcasavan@sgi.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] NUMA boot hash allocation interleaving
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 10:56:29 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041220165629.GA21231@rx8.austin.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041216141814.GA10292@rx8.austin.ibm.com>

Jose R. Santos <jrsantos@austin.ibm.com> [041216]:
> I can do the SpecSFS runs but each runs takes several hours to complete
> and I would need to do two runs (baseline and patched).  I may have it 
> ready by today or tommorow.

The difference between the two runs was with in noise of the benchmark on
my small setup.  I wont be able to get a larger NUMA system until next year,
so I'll retest when that happens.  In the mean time, I don't see a reason
either to stall this patch, but that may change on I get numbers on a
larger system.

-JRS

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Jose R. Santos" <jrsantos@austin.ibm.com>
To: "Jose R. Santos" <jrsantos@austin.ibm.com>
Cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
	"Martin J. Bligh" <Martin.Bligh@us.ibm.com>,
	Brent Casavant <bcasavan@sgi.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] NUMA boot hash allocation interleaving
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 10:56:29 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041220165629.GA21231@rx8.austin.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041216141814.GA10292@rx8.austin.ibm.com>

Jose R. Santos <jrsantos@austin.ibm.com> [041216]:
> I can do the SpecSFS runs but each runs takes several hours to complete
> and I would need to do two runs (baseline and patched).  I may have it 
> ready by today or tommorow.

The difference between the two runs was with in noise of the benchmark on
my small setup.  I wont be able to get a larger NUMA system until next year,
so I'll retest when that happens.  In the mean time, I don't see a reason
either to stall this patch, but that may change on I get numbers on a
larger system.

-JRS
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2004-12-20 16:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 92+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-12-14 17:53 [PATCH 0/3] NUMA boot hash allocation interleaving Brent Casavant
2004-12-14 17:53 ` Brent Casavant
2004-12-14 17:53 ` Brent Casavant
2004-12-14 18:32 ` Luck, Tony
2004-12-14 18:32   ` Luck, Tony
2004-12-14 18:32   ` Luck, Tony
2004-12-15  0:28   ` Hiroyuki KAMEZAWA
2004-12-15  0:28     ` Hiroyuki KAMEZAWA
2004-12-15  0:28     ` Hiroyuki KAMEZAWA
2004-12-14 18:59 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-12-14 18:59   ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-12-14 18:59   ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-12-14 19:13   ` Andi Kleen
2004-12-14 19:13     ` Andi Kleen
2004-12-14 19:13     ` Andi Kleen
2004-12-14 19:48     ` Brent Casavant
2004-12-14 19:48       ` Brent Casavant
2004-12-14 19:48       ` Brent Casavant
2004-12-14 20:08     ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-12-14 20:08       ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-12-14 20:08       ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-12-14 23:24       ` Brent Casavant
2004-12-14 23:24         ` Brent Casavant
2004-12-14 23:24         ` Brent Casavant
2004-12-14 22:00         ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-12-14 22:00           ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-12-14 22:00           ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-12-15  4:58           ` Andi Kleen
2004-12-15  4:58             ` Andi Kleen
2004-12-15  4:58             ` Andi Kleen
2004-12-15 14:47             ` Anton Blanchard
2004-12-15 14:47               ` Anton Blanchard
2004-12-15 14:47               ` Anton Blanchard
2004-12-15 23:37               ` Brent Casavant
2004-12-15 23:37                 ` Brent Casavant
2004-12-15 23:37                 ` Brent Casavant
2004-12-16  5:02               ` Andi Kleen
2004-12-16  5:02                 ` Andi Kleen
2004-12-16  5:02                 ` Andi Kleen
2004-12-16  5:13                 ` Anton Blanchard
2004-12-16 14:18                   ` Jose R. Santos
2004-12-16 14:18                     ` Jose R. Santos
2004-12-16 14:18                     ` Jose R. Santos
2004-12-20 16:56                     ` Jose R. Santos [this message]
2004-12-20 16:56                       ` Jose R. Santos
2004-12-20 16:56                       ` Jose R. Santos
2004-12-21 11:46                       ` Anton Blanchard
2004-12-21 11:46                         ` Anton Blanchard
2004-12-21 11:46                         ` Anton Blanchard
2004-12-21 16:23                         ` Brent Casavant
2004-12-21 16:23                           ` Brent Casavant
2004-12-21 16:23                           ` Brent Casavant
2004-12-23  2:19                           ` Jose R. Santos
2004-12-23  2:19                             ` Jose R. Santos
2004-12-23  2:19                             ` Jose R. Santos
2004-12-15  4:08         ` Andi Kleen
2004-12-15  4:08           ` Andi Kleen
2004-12-15  4:08           ` Andi Kleen
2004-12-15  7:14           ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-12-15  7:14             ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-12-15  7:14             ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-12-15  7:17             ` Andi Kleen
2004-12-15  7:17               ` Andi Kleen
2004-12-15  7:17               ` Andi Kleen
2004-12-15 15:08               ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-12-15 15:08                 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-12-15 15:08                 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-12-15 18:24               ` Brent Casavant
2004-12-15 18:24                 ` Brent Casavant
2004-12-15 18:24                 ` Brent Casavant
2004-12-15  7:41           ` Eric Dumazet
2004-12-15  7:41             ` Eric Dumazet
2004-12-15  7:41             ` Eric Dumazet
2004-12-15  7:46             ` Andi Kleen
2004-12-15  7:46               ` Andi Kleen
2004-12-15  7:46               ` Andi Kleen
2004-12-15  9:14               ` Andi Kleen
2004-12-15  9:14                 ` Andi Kleen
2004-12-15  9:14                 ` Andi Kleen
2004-12-14 23:24     ` Nick Piggin
2004-12-14 23:24       ` Nick Piggin
2004-12-14 23:24       ` Nick Piggin
2004-12-14 19:30   ` Brent Casavant
2004-12-14 19:30     ` Brent Casavant
2004-12-14 19:30     ` Brent Casavant
2004-12-14 20:10     ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-12-14 20:10       ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-12-14 20:10       ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-12-15 17:25 ` Luck, Tony
2004-12-15 17:25   ` Luck, Tony
2004-12-15 17:25   ` Luck, Tony
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-12-20 23:36 Brent Casavant

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20041220165629.GA21231@rx8.austin.ibm.com \
    --to=jrsantos@austin.ibm.com \
    --cc=Martin.Bligh@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=bcasavan@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.