* status of poll/select in procfs
@ 2005-01-06 16:51 Alban Crequy
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Alban Crequy @ 2005-01-06 16:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: wmorgan-ruby-talkmasanjin.net, roots
I wonder what is the status of the poll/select syscalls with procfs:
should work, not tested or unwanted feature?
My tests say that some procfs' files work with select and some don't.
I've read the [1] thread.
This is a real-life issue for some interpretors since users threads may
be implemented with select in order to avoid one user thread blocking
others user threads. Ruby does that.
For example, some Ruby users report [2] [3] [4] that bugs are coming
from bug in procfs-select.
[1] http://www.issociate.de/board/post/28768/%5BPATCH_md_0_of_2%5D_Introduction.html
[2] http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/109668
[3] http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/110600
[4] (fr) http://linux.ensimag.fr/lists-archives/liste/2005-January/001396.html
--
Alban Crequy
PS: please CC: me as I am not subscribed to the list.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2005-01-06 16:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-01-06 16:51 status of poll/select in procfs Alban Crequy
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.