All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Golubev <dmitry@mikrotik.com>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Doubt regarding priority of classes with HTB
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 17:02:17 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200501181902.17426.dmitry@mikrotik.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050118061115.8420123EF73@ws5-4.us4.outblaze.com>

Are you sure we do care about priorities of inner classes? It seems for me 
that you do not even have this entry in the memory structure in case of inner 
class - only leaf classes have prios.

Dmitry

On Tuesday 18 January 2005 17:47, "sanjeev ravindran" 
<sanjeev_ravindran@linuxmail.org> wrote:
> Thank you for ur response,
> Actually I too found the same in user guide of htb... however i was bit
> confused about the priority of different classes.... now things are
> clear...
> thanks again
> sanjeev
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tóth Nándor" <nug@sch.bme.hu>
> To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
> Subject: Re: [LARTC] Doubt regarding priority of classes with HTB
> Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 09:35:12 +0100
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > sanjeev ravindran wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm a bit confused with the priority of different classes with
> > > HTB. How it will be? Will the class with lowest no: have maximum
> > > priority?
> > >
> > > Any help is most appreciated,
> > > Thanks in advance,
> > > Sanjeev
> >
> > http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/manual/userg.htm#prio
> >
> > "Priorizing traffic has two sides. First it affects how the excess
> > bandwidth is distributed among siblings. Up to now we have seen
> > that excess bandwidth was distibuted according to rate ratios. Now
> > I used basic configuration from chapter 3 (hierarchy without
> > ceiling and bursts) and changed priority of all classes to 1 except
> > SMTP (green) which I set to 0 (higher).
> >  From sharing view you see that the class got all the excess
> > bandwidth. The rule is that classes with higher priority are
> > offered excess bandwidth first. But rules about guaranted rate and
> > ceil are still met."
> >
> > -- Udv,
> >    Nandor
> > _______________________________________________
> > LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

      parent reply	other threads:[~2005-01-18 17:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-01-18  6:11 [LARTC] Doubt regarding priority of classes with HTB sanjeev ravindran
2005-01-18  8:35 ` Tóth Nándor
2005-01-18 15:47 ` sanjeev ravindran
2005-01-18 17:02 ` Dmitry Golubev [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200501181902.17426.dmitry@mikrotik.com \
    --to=dmitry@mikrotik.com \
    --cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.