From: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
To: ralf@linux-mips.org
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org
Subject: [KJ] MIPS still uses sleep_on*()
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 21:47:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050125214701.GA2689@us.ibm.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 745 bytes --]
Hi,
I am trying to clean up the remaning sleep_on*() calls in the kernel. These
functions have been deprecated for a *long* time, just never completely removed
:)
The only file I'm not comfortable with changing myself (since I am not a MIPS
user/expert) is arch/mips/kernel/process.c. This file references sleep_on(),
sleep_on_timeout(), interruptible_sleep_on() and
interruptible_sleep_on_timeout().
This file is (presuming my upcoming patches for sleep_on() go through
Kernel-Janitors ok) the final one before we can declare the kernel clean of
sleep_on() callers -- the other members of the family will take longer.
Any insight anyone could provide would be great, so that this milestone (for me,
at least) can be achieved.
Thanks,
Nish
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 167 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org
http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
To: ralf@linux-mips.org
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org
Subject: MIPS still uses sleep_on*()
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 13:47:01 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050125214701.GA2689@us.ibm.com> (raw)
Hi,
I am trying to clean up the remaning sleep_on*() calls in the kernel. These
functions have been deprecated for a *long* time, just never completely removed
:)
The only file I'm not comfortable with changing myself (since I am not a MIPS
user/expert) is arch/mips/kernel/process.c. This file references sleep_on(),
sleep_on_timeout(), interruptible_sleep_on() and
interruptible_sleep_on_timeout().
This file is (presuming my upcoming patches for sleep_on() go through
Kernel-Janitors ok) the final one before we can declare the kernel clean of
sleep_on() callers -- the other members of the family will take longer.
Any insight anyone could provide would be great, so that this milestone (for me,
at least) can be achieved.
Thanks,
Nish
next reply other threads:[~2005-01-25 21:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-25 21:47 Nishanth Aravamudan [this message]
2005-01-25 21:47 ` MIPS still uses sleep_on*() Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-01-26 3:09 ` [KJ] " Atsushi Nemoto
2005-01-26 3:09 ` Atsushi Nemoto
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050125214701.GA2689@us.ibm.com \
--to=nacc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.