All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
To: Martin Josefsson <gandalf@wlug.westbo.se>
Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com, bridge@osdl.org, snort2004@mail.ru,
	bdschuym@pandora.be, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, dwmw2@infradead.org,
	ak@suse.de, shemminger@osdl.org
Subject: [Bridge] Re: [PATCH/RFC] Reduce call chain length in netfilter (was: Re: do_IRQ: stack overflow: 872..)
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 22:05:58 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050125220558.6e824f8a.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1106496509.1085.1.camel@tux.rsn.bth.se>

On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 17:08:29 +0100
Martin Josefsson <gandalf@wlug.westbo.se> wrote:

> I'm now running a kernel with this patch and everything seems to still
> be working.
> So unless someone else has something to comment I think this should be
> applied.
> The decrease in call-depth is important.

I would like to see at least one ACK from the netfilter
folks.  Bart or Rusty, could you forward to patch to
netfilter-devel for review?

I have some other ideas about how bridging might be able
to save some call chain depth... but I need to think about
it some more before proposing or even trying to implement.
(basically something akin to how we do route level packet
 output, via dst_output(), but instead we're doing this
 at ->hard_start_xmit() time)

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
To: Martin Josefsson <gandalf@wlug.westbo.se>
Cc: bdschuym@pandora.be, shemminger@osdl.org, dwmw2@infradead.org,
	ak@suse.de, snort2004@mail.ru, bridge@osdl.org,
	netdev@oss.sgi.com, rusty@rustcorp.com.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] Reduce call chain length in netfilter (was: Re: do_IRQ: stack overflow: 872..)
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 22:05:58 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050125220558.6e824f8a.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1106496509.1085.1.camel@tux.rsn.bth.se>

On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 17:08:29 +0100
Martin Josefsson <gandalf@wlug.westbo.se> wrote:

> I'm now running a kernel with this patch and everything seems to still
> be working.
> So unless someone else has something to comment I think this should be
> applied.
> The decrease in call-depth is important.

I would like to see at least one ACK from the netfilter
folks.  Bart or Rusty, could you forward to patch to
netfilter-devel for review?

I have some other ideas about how bridging might be able
to save some call chain depth... but I need to think about
it some more before proposing or even trying to implement.
(basically something akin to how we do route level packet
 output, via dst_output(), but instead we're doing this
 at ->hard_start_xmit() time)

  reply	other threads:[~2005-01-26  6:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1131604877.20041218092730@mail.ru.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2004-12-18  7:50 ` do_IRQ: stack overflow: 872 Andi Kleen
2004-12-18 11:12   ` Bart De Schuymer
2004-12-18 11:14     ` Andi Kleen
2004-12-18 11:51       ` Bart De Schuymer
2004-12-18 13:53         ` Andi Kleen
2004-12-18 16:07           ` Re[2]: " Crazy AMD K7
2004-12-18 16:46             ` Bart De Schuymer
2005-01-07 17:05   ` David Woodhouse
2005-01-07 18:00     ` [Bridge] " Stephen Hemminger
2005-01-07 18:00       ` Stephen Hemminger
2005-01-07 18:06       ` [Bridge] " David Woodhouse
2005-01-07 18:06         ` David Woodhouse
2005-01-07 21:27       ` [Bridge] " Bart De Schuymer
2005-01-07 21:27         ` Bart De Schuymer
2005-01-18 21:57         ` [Bridge] " David S. Miller
2005-01-18 21:57           ` David S. Miller
2005-01-22 22:30           ` [Bridge] [PATCH/RFC] Reduce call chain length in netfilter (was: Re: do_IRQ: stack overflow: 872..) Bart De Schuymer
2005-01-22 22:30             ` Bart De Schuymer
2005-01-22 23:22             ` [Bridge] " Martin Josefsson
2005-01-22 23:22               ` Martin Josefsson
2005-01-23 12:40               ` [Bridge] " Bart De Schuymer
2005-01-23 12:40                 ` Bart De Schuymer
2005-01-23 16:08                 ` [Bridge] " Martin Josefsson
2005-01-23 16:08                   ` Martin Josefsson
2005-01-26  6:05                   ` David S. Miller [this message]
2005-01-26  6:05                     ` David S. Miller
2005-01-26  9:08                     ` [Bridge] " Bart De Schuymer
2005-01-26  9:08                       ` Bart De Schuymer
2005-01-26 23:49                       ` [Bridge] Re: [PATCH/RFC] Reduce call chain length in netfilter Patrick McHardy
2005-01-26 23:49                         ` Patrick McHardy
2005-01-27  7:18                         ` [Bridge] " David S. Miller
2005-01-27  7:18                           ` David S. Miller
2005-01-27 17:50                           ` [Bridge] " Patrick McHardy
2005-01-27 17:50                             ` Patrick McHardy
2005-01-27 19:47                             ` [Bridge] " David S. Miller
2005-01-27 19:47                               ` David S. Miller
2005-01-27 21:16                               ` [Bridge] " Bart De Schuymer
2005-01-27 21:16                                 ` Bart De Schuymer
2005-01-27 22:48                               ` [Bridge] " Patrick McHardy
2005-01-27 22:48                                 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-01-27 23:24                                 ` [Bridge] " David S. Miller
2005-01-27 23:24                                   ` David S. Miller
2005-01-28  0:08                                   ` [Bridge] " Patrick McHardy
2005-01-28  0:08                                     ` Patrick McHardy
2005-01-28  0:29                                   ` [Bridge] " Rusty Russell
2005-01-28  0:29                                     ` Rusty Russell
2005-01-28  1:10                                     ` [Bridge] " David S. Miller
2005-01-28  1:10                                       ` David S. Miller
2005-01-28  1:32                                       ` [Bridge] " Rusty Russell
2005-01-28  1:32                                         ` Rusty Russell
2005-01-28  1:35                                         ` [Bridge] " Patrick McHardy
2005-01-28  1:35                                           ` Patrick McHardy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050125220558.6e824f8a.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=bdschuym@pandora.be \
    --cc=bridge@osdl.org \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=gandalf@wlug.westbo.se \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=shemminger@osdl.org \
    --cc=snort2004@mail.ru \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.