From: greg@kroah.com (Greg KH)
To: LM Sensors <sensors@stimpy.netroedge.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, Sergey Vlasov <vsu@altlinux.ru>
Subject: [PATCH 2.6] I2C: Prevent buffer overflow on SMBus block read in
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 06:25:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050125224258.GA18228@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050125230348.294aa0b9.khali@linux-fr.org>
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 11:03:48PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Greg, Linus, all,
>
> I just hit a buffer overflow while playing around with i2cdump and
> i2c-viapro through i2c-dev. This is caused by a missing length check on
> a buffer operation when doing a SMBus block read in the i2c-viapro
> driver. The problem was already known and had been fixed upon report by
> Sergey Vlasov back in August 2003 in lm_sensors (2.4 kernel version of
> the driver) but for some reason it was never ported to the 2.6 kernel
> version.
>
> I am not a security expert but I would guess that such a buffer overflow
> could possibly be used to run arbitrary code in kernel space from user
> space through i2c-dev. The severity obviously depends on the permisions
> set on the i2c device files in /dev. Maybe it wouldn't be a bad idea to
> push this patch upstream rather sooner than later.
Hm, all distros leave the i2c-dev /dev nodes writable only by root, so
this isn't that "big" of an issue. I also thought I had caught all of
this previously, when Sergey did the 2.4 patches.
> --- linux-2.6.11-rc1-bk8/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-viapro.c.orig 2005-01-21 20:05:05.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux-2.6.11-rc1-bk8/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-viapro.c 2005-01-25 21:45:01.000000000 +0100
> @@ -233,8 +233,8 @@
> len = data->block[0];
> if (len < 0)
> len = 0;
> - if (len > 32)
> - len = 32;
> + if (len > I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX)
> + len = I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX;
> outb_p(len, SMBHSTDAT0);
> i = inb_p(SMBHSTCNT); /* Reset SMBBLKDAT */
> for (i = 1; i <= len; i++)
> @@ -268,6 +268,8 @@
> break;
> case VT596_BLOCK_DATA:
> data->block[0] = inb_p(SMBHSTDAT0);
> + if (data->block[0] > I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX)
> + data->block[0] = I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX;
But data->block[0] just came from the hardware, right? Not from a user.
Now if we have broken hardware, then we might have a problem here, but
otherwise I don't see it as a security issue right now.
thanks,
greg k-h
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: LM Sensors <sensors@stimpy.netroedge.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, Sergey Vlasov <vsu@altlinux.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6] I2C: Prevent buffer overflow on SMBus block read in i2c-viapro
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 14:42:59 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050125224258.GA18228@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050125230348.294aa0b9.khali@linux-fr.org>
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 11:03:48PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Greg, Linus, all,
>
> I just hit a buffer overflow while playing around with i2cdump and
> i2c-viapro through i2c-dev. This is caused by a missing length check on
> a buffer operation when doing a SMBus block read in the i2c-viapro
> driver. The problem was already known and had been fixed upon report by
> Sergey Vlasov back in August 2003 in lm_sensors (2.4 kernel version of
> the driver) but for some reason it was never ported to the 2.6 kernel
> version.
>
> I am not a security expert but I would guess that such a buffer overflow
> could possibly be used to run arbitrary code in kernel space from user
> space through i2c-dev. The severity obviously depends on the permisions
> set on the i2c device files in /dev. Maybe it wouldn't be a bad idea to
> push this patch upstream rather sooner than later.
Hm, all distros leave the i2c-dev /dev nodes writable only by root, so
this isn't that "big" of an issue. I also thought I had caught all of
this previously, when Sergey did the 2.4 patches.
> --- linux-2.6.11-rc1-bk8/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-viapro.c.orig 2005-01-21 20:05:05.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux-2.6.11-rc1-bk8/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-viapro.c 2005-01-25 21:45:01.000000000 +0100
> @@ -233,8 +233,8 @@
> len = data->block[0];
> if (len < 0)
> len = 0;
> - if (len > 32)
> - len = 32;
> + if (len > I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX)
> + len = I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX;
> outb_p(len, SMBHSTDAT0);
> i = inb_p(SMBHSTCNT); /* Reset SMBBLKDAT */
> for (i = 1; i <= len; i++)
> @@ -268,6 +268,8 @@
> break;
> case VT596_BLOCK_DATA:
> data->block[0] = inb_p(SMBHSTDAT0);
> + if (data->block[0] > I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX)
> + data->block[0] = I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX;
But data->block[0] just came from the hardware, right? Not from a user.
Now if we have broken hardware, then we might have a problem here, but
otherwise I don't see it as a security issue right now.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-19 6:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-25 22:03 [PATCH 2.6] I2C: Prevent buffer overflow on SMBus block read in i2c-viapro Jean Delvare
2005-05-19 6:25 ` [PATCH 2.6] I2C: Prevent buffer overflow on SMBus block read in Jean Delvare
2005-01-25 22:42 ` Greg KH [this message]
2005-05-19 6:25 ` Greg KH
2005-01-26 9:17 ` [PATCH 2.6] I2C: Prevent buffer overflow on SMBus block read in i2c-viapro Jean Delvare
2005-05-19 6:25 ` [PATCH 2.6] I2C: Prevent buffer overflow on SMBus block read in Jean Delvare
2005-02-01 8:22 ` [PATCH 2.6] I2C: Prevent buffer overflow on SMBus block read in i2c-viapro Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:25 ` [PATCH 2.6] I2C: Prevent buffer overflow on SMBus block read in Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050125224258.GA18228@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sensors@stimpy.netroedge.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=vsu@altlinux.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.