From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: TASK_SIZE is variable.
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 07:36:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050126063627.GA7198@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050125155239.4bc469e6.davem@davemloft.net>
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 03:52:39PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 22:26:52 +0000
> David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> > Bad things can happen if a 32-bit process is the last user of a 64-bit
> > mm.
>
> I guess this is OK.
I still don't get it. When exactly can a process have memory > 32bit
and not have the 32bit flag set that is checked by TASK_SIZE. IMHO that's
the bug that needs addressing, because it will likely break more code.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-26 6:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-25 22:26 TASK_SIZE is variable David Woodhouse
2005-01-25 23:52 ` David S. Miller
2005-01-26 6:36 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2005-01-26 6:41 ` David S. Miller
2005-01-26 7:13 ` Andi Kleen
2005-01-26 7:24 ` Andrew Morton
2005-01-26 7:43 ` Andi Kleen
2005-01-26 8:01 ` Andrew Morton
2005-01-26 8:04 ` Andi Kleen
2005-01-28 2:58 ` Paul Mackerras
2005-01-28 3:11 ` Paul Mackerras
2005-01-28 3:17 ` Andrew Morton
2005-01-28 6:40 ` Andi Kleen
2005-01-29 11:23 ` Anton Blanchard
2005-01-28 8:46 ` Russell King
2005-01-28 6:39 ` Andi Kleen
2005-01-28 11:32 ` David Woodhouse
2005-01-26 7:54 ` David Woodhouse
2005-01-29 20:23 ` Andrew Morton
2005-01-29 23:28 ` Paul Mackerras
2005-01-30 11:01 ` Andi Kleen
2005-01-30 12:10 ` Paul Mackerras
2005-01-31 2:23 ` David S. Miller
2005-01-31 9:23 ` Andi Kleen
2005-01-31 19:29 ` David S. Miller
2005-01-31 19:38 ` Andi Kleen
2005-01-31 20:35 ` David S. Miller
2005-02-03 4:08 ` Andrew Morton
2005-02-03 6:28 ` David S. Miller
2005-02-03 7:19 ` Andi Kleen
2005-02-03 9:23 ` David Woodhouse
2005-01-31 2:33 ` Matthew Wilcox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050126063627.GA7198@wotan.suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.