Re: [RFC][PATCH] swsusp: do not use higher order memory allocations on suspend

["Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>]

On Friday, 28 of January 2005 15:07, Martin Zwickel wrote:
> > @@ -373,15 +377,22 @@
> >  
> >  static int write_pagedir(void)
> >  {
> > -	unsigned long addr = (unsigned long)pagedir_nosave;
> >  	int error = 0;
> > -	int n = SUSPEND_PD_PAGES(nr_copy_pages);
> > -	int i;
> > +	unsigned n = 0;
> > +	struct pbe * pbe;
> > +
> > +	printk( "Writing pagedir ...");
> > 
> > +
> > +	pr_debug("\b\b\bdone (%u pages)\n", n);
> 
> Just cosmetic:
> Why do you use pr_debug here instead of printk like you did above?

By mistake. :-)  Thanks!  

Greets,
RJW


-- 
- Would you tell me, please, which way I ought to go from here?
- That depends a good deal on where you want to get to.
		-- Lewis Carroll "Alice's Adventures in Wonderland"