* [KJ] Re: [PATCH 33/39] usb/ati_remote: use wait_event_timeout()
@ 2005-01-31 18:58 Greg KH
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2005-01-31 18:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernel-janitors
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 393 bytes --]
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 01:31:27PM -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please consider applying.
>
> Description: Use wait_event_timeout() instead of custom wait-queue code. The
> current code uses TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE but doesn't seem to care about signals
> so TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE should be ok.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
Applied, thanks.
greg k-h
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 167 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org
http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2005-01-31 18:58 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-01-31 18:58 [KJ] Re: [PATCH 33/39] usb/ati_remote: use wait_event_timeout() Greg KH
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.