From: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
To: jgarzik@pobox.com
Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com, kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org
Subject: [KJ] [PATCH 3/20] net/8139too: remove
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 18:11:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050202181129.GD2546@us.ibm.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1738 bytes --]
Hello,
Please consider applying.
One thing I would have preferred using here is use wait_event*(), but there is
no condition. However, try_to_freeze(PF_FREEZE) could be used as one, if the
return condition matters -- it can return 0 or 1, from what I understand. If the
intent is to loop until the task is "frozen," then I can revise the patch to use
wait_event_interruptible_timeout().
Description: Replace deprecated interruptible_sleep_on_timeout() function calls
with direct wait-queue usage. I did not find the direct wake_up_interruptible()
function call in this file for the wait-queue, but that may not be an issue.
Patch is compile-tested.
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
--- 2.6.11-rc2-kj-v/drivers/net/8139too.c 2005-01-24 09:34:08.000000000 -0800
+++ 2.6.11-rc2-kj/drivers/net/8139too.c 2005-01-27 11:22:19.000000000 -0800
@@ -108,6 +108,7 @@
#include <linux/mii.h>
#include <linux/completion.h>
#include <linux/crc32.h>
+#include <linux/wait.h>
#include <asm/io.h>
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
#include <asm/irq.h>
@@ -1612,6 +1613,7 @@ static inline void rtl8139_thread_iter (
static int rtl8139_thread (void *data)
{
+ DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
struct net_device *dev = data;
struct rtl8139_private *tp = dev->priv;
unsigned long timeout;
@@ -1622,7 +1624,9 @@ static int rtl8139_thread (void *data)
while (1) {
timeout = next_tick;
do {
- timeout = interruptible_sleep_on_timeout (&tp->thr_wait, timeout);
+ prepare_to_wait(&tp->thr_wait, &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
+ timeout = schedule_timeout(timeout);
+ finish_wait(&tp->thr_wait, &wait);
/* make swsusp happy with our thread */
try_to_freeze(PF_FREEZE);
} while (!signal_pending (current) && (timeout > 0));
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 167 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org
http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
To: jgarzik@pobox.com
Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com, kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org
Subject: [KJ] [PATCH 3/20] net/8139too: remove interruptible_sleep_on_timeout() usage
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 10:11:29 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050202181129.GD2546@us.ibm.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1738 bytes --]
Hello,
Please consider applying.
One thing I would have preferred using here is use wait_event*(), but there is
no condition. However, try_to_freeze(PF_FREEZE) could be used as one, if the
return condition matters -- it can return 0 or 1, from what I understand. If the
intent is to loop until the task is "frozen," then I can revise the patch to use
wait_event_interruptible_timeout().
Description: Replace deprecated interruptible_sleep_on_timeout() function calls
with direct wait-queue usage. I did not find the direct wake_up_interruptible()
function call in this file for the wait-queue, but that may not be an issue.
Patch is compile-tested.
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
--- 2.6.11-rc2-kj-v/drivers/net/8139too.c 2005-01-24 09:34:08.000000000 -0800
+++ 2.6.11-rc2-kj/drivers/net/8139too.c 2005-01-27 11:22:19.000000000 -0800
@@ -108,6 +108,7 @@
#include <linux/mii.h>
#include <linux/completion.h>
#include <linux/crc32.h>
+#include <linux/wait.h>
#include <asm/io.h>
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
#include <asm/irq.h>
@@ -1612,6 +1613,7 @@ static inline void rtl8139_thread_iter (
static int rtl8139_thread (void *data)
{
+ DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
struct net_device *dev = data;
struct rtl8139_private *tp = dev->priv;
unsigned long timeout;
@@ -1622,7 +1624,9 @@ static int rtl8139_thread (void *data)
while (1) {
timeout = next_tick;
do {
- timeout = interruptible_sleep_on_timeout (&tp->thr_wait, timeout);
+ prepare_to_wait(&tp->thr_wait, &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
+ timeout = schedule_timeout(timeout);
+ finish_wait(&tp->thr_wait, &wait);
/* make swsusp happy with our thread */
try_to_freeze(PF_FREEZE);
} while (!signal_pending (current) && (timeout > 0));
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 167 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org
http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors
next reply other threads:[~2005-02-02 18:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-02 18:11 Nishanth Aravamudan [this message]
2005-02-02 18:11 ` [KJ] [PATCH 3/20] net/8139too: remove interruptible_sleep_on_timeout() usage Nishanth Aravamudan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050202181129.GD2546@us.ibm.com \
--to=nacc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.