Re: [PATCH] (1/3) cpufreq_ondemand - 01_ignore-nice.diff

[PCS <pcs@olympe.ch>]

Le Dimanche 20 Février 2005 19.14, Alexander Clouter a écrit :
(snip)
> Along similar lines, I was told that initialising statics to zero *must* be
> done and not assumed; friends have told me its a 'gcc specific extension'.
> Last time I was told this was not necessary...

I'm really not sure it is a "gcc specific extension", re-read paragraph 6.7.8 
from the ISO 9899:1999 norm, especially point 10. It explicitly say :

10 If an object that has automatic storage duration is not initialized
     explicitly, its value is indeterminate. If an object that has static
     storage duration is not initialized explicitly, then:
   - if it has pointer type, it is initialized to a null pointer;
   - if it has arithmetic type, it is initialized to (positive or unsigned
      zero;
   - if it is an aggregate, every member is initialized (recursively)
     according to these rules;
   - if it is a union, the first named member is initialized (recursively)
     according to these rules.

Regards,
Pcs