* v2.4 megaraid2 update Re: [PATCH] Prevent NMI oopser
[not found] ` <20050207202745.GA19104@kmv.ru>
@ 2005-02-23 7:06 ` Marcelo Tosatti
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Marcelo Tosatti @ 2005-02-23 7:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrey J. Melnikoff (TEMHOTA), Vasily Averin
Cc: Matt Domsch, linux-kernel, Mukker, Atul, Bagalkote, Sreenivas
Hi,
As the megaraid2 maintainers dont seem to care about v2.4 mainline at all, completly
ignoring my requests to fix the NMI oopser bug for several months, I'm applying the RHEL3
update + inline reordering, which should do it.
At this point I'm quite sure they wont answer this message either. :(
Thanks Vasily and Andrey.
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 11:27:45PM +0300, Andrey J. Melnikoff (TEMHOTA) wrote:
> Hi Matt, Marcelo!
> On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 02:19:14PM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote next:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 10:32:28PM +0300, Vasily Averin wrote:
> > > >As a hack, one could #define inline /*nothing*/ in megaraid2.h to
> > > >avoid this, but it would be nice if the functions could all get
> > > >reordered such that inlining works properly, and the need for function
> > > >declarations in megaraid2.h would disappear completely.
> > >
> > >
> > > Could you fix it by additional patch? Or you going to prepare a new one?
>
> Any chance to include this two patches before 2.4.30 release?
>
> Vasily Averin patch:
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=110737085714273&w=2
> And my (incremental) patch:
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=110738438005846&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* RE: v2.4 megaraid2 update Re: [PATCH] Prevent NMI oopser
@ 2005-03-02 16:26 Bagalkote, Sreenivas
2005-03-02 20:55 ` Marcelo Tosatti
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Bagalkote, Sreenivas @ 2005-03-02 16:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Marcelo Tosatti', Andrey J. Melnikoff (TEMHOTA),
Vasily Averin
Cc: Matt Domsch, linux-kernel, Mukker, Atul
Hello Marcelo,
As per our offline conversation, I have verified the update that went into
2.4.30-pre2.
I confirm that all changes are correct. I have only one doubt: The driver
was using
sleep_on_timeout for lack of msleep. Should it start using msleep now?
Vasily & Andrey, thank you for your efforts.
Thanks,
Sreenivas
LSI LOGIC Corporation
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Marcelo Tosatti [mailto:marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 2:06 AM
>To: Andrey J. Melnikoff (TEMHOTA); Vasily Averin
>Cc: Matt Domsch; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Mukker, Atul;
>Bagalkote, Sreenivas
>Subject: v2.4 megaraid2 update Re: [PATCH] Prevent NMI oopser
>
>
>Hi,
>
>As the megaraid2 maintainers dont seem to care about v2.4
>mainline at all, completly
>ignoring my requests to fix the NMI oopser bug for several
>months, I'm applying the RHEL3
>update + inline reordering, which should do it.
>
>At this point I'm quite sure they wont answer this message either. :(
>
>Thanks Vasily and Andrey.
>
>On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 11:27:45PM +0300, Andrey J. Melnikoff
>(TEMHOTA) wrote:
>> Hi Matt, Marcelo!
>> On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 02:19:14PM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote next:
>>
>> > On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 10:32:28PM +0300, Vasily Averin wrote:
>> > > >As a hack, one could #define inline /*nothing*/ in
>megaraid2.h to
>> > > >avoid this, but it would be nice if the functions could all get
>> > > >reordered such that inlining works properly, and the
>need for function
>> > > >declarations in megaraid2.h would disappear completely.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Could you fix it by additional patch? Or you going to
>prepare a new one?
>>
>> Any chance to include this two patches before 2.4.30 release?
>>
>> Vasily Averin patch:
>> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=110737085714273&w=2
>> And my (incremental) patch:
>> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=110738438005846&w=2
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: v2.4 megaraid2 update Re: [PATCH] Prevent NMI oopser
2005-03-02 16:26 v2.4 megaraid2 update Re: [PATCH] Prevent NMI oopser Bagalkote, Sreenivas
@ 2005-03-02 20:55 ` Marcelo Tosatti
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Marcelo Tosatti @ 2005-03-02 20:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bagalkote, Sreenivas
Cc: Andrey J. Melnikoff (TEMHOTA), Vasily Averin, Matt Domsch,
linux-kernel, Mukker, Atul
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 11:26:06AM -0500, Bagalkote, Sreenivas wrote:
> Hello Marcelo,
Hi Sreenivas,
Damn, now I apologize for taking so long to answer...
> As per our offline conversation, I have verified the update that went into
> 2.4.30-pre2.
> I confirm that all changes are correct. I have only one doubt: The driver
> was using
> sleep_on_timeout for lack of msleep. Should it start using msleep now?
I dont see the need for msleep() given that sleep_on_timeout() schedules.
The problematic EH code which used udelay() was removed AFAICS.
> Vasily & Andrey, thank you for your efforts.
I appreciate your offline message that you're compromised to
keep an eye on v2.4 megaraid2 from now on :)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-03-03 1:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-03-02 16:26 v2.4 megaraid2 update Re: [PATCH] Prevent NMI oopser Bagalkote, Sreenivas
2005-03-02 20:55 ` Marcelo Tosatti
[not found] <41F5FC96.2010103@sw.ru>
2005-01-31 23:17 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2005-02-02 18:42 ` Vasily Averin
2005-02-02 19:06 ` Matt Domsch
2005-02-02 19:32 ` Vasily Averin
2005-02-02 20:19 ` Matt Domsch
[not found] ` <20050207202745.GA19104@kmv.ru>
2005-02-23 7:06 ` v2.4 megaraid2 update " Marcelo Tosatti
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.