[OT] LARTC list

[OT] LARTC list

[Eric Dantan Rzewnicki]

Does anyone here know what happened to the LARTC list? It appears to
have died Feb 18th, 2005.

Thanks,
-- 
Eric Dantan Rzewnicki  |  Systems Administrator
Technical Operations Division  |  Radio Free Asia
2025 M Street, NW  |  Washington, DC 20036  |  202-530-4900
CONFIDENTIAL COMMUNICATION
This e-mail message is intended only for the use of the addressee and
may contain information that is privileged and confidential. Any 
unauthorized dissemination, distribution, or copying is strictly 
prohibited. If you receive this transmission in error, please contact
network@rfa.org.

Re: [OT] LARTC list

[Jason Opperisano]

On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 12:45:05PM -0500, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
> Does anyone here know what happened to the LARTC list? It appears to
> have died Feb 18th, 2005.

i don't know what happened--but i can confirm that the last message i
received was 02-18-2005 @ 16:16.

-j

--
"Fame was like a drug. But what was even more like a drug were
 the drugs."
        --The Simpsons

Re: [OT] LARTC list

[Eric Dantan Rzewnicki]

On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 12:57:36PM -0500, Jason Opperisano wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 12:45:05PM -0500, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
> > Does anyone here know what happened to the LARTC list? It appears to
> > have died Feb 18th, 2005.
> i don't know what happened--but i can confirm that the last message i
> received was 02-18-2005 @ 16:16.
> -j
> --

Does this list's topic overlap with the LARTC list? I understand that
tc, ip and other such tools discussed in the LARTC world are interfaces
to netfilter. But, if LARTC is never resurrected will I miss it if I
start following this list?
-- 
Eric Dantan Rzewnicki  |  Systems Administrator
Technical Operations Division  |  Radio Free Asia
2025 M Street, NW  |  Washington, DC 20036  |  202-530-4900
CONFIDENTIAL COMMUNICATION
This e-mail message is intended only for the use of the addressee and
may contain information that is privileged and confidential. Any 
unauthorized dissemination, distribution, or copying is strictly 
prohibited. If you receive this transmission in error, please contact
network@rfa.org.

Re: [OT] LARTC list

[Stephen Frost]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1009 bytes --]

* Eric Dantan Rzewnicki (rzewnickie@rfa.org) wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 12:57:36PM -0500, Jason Opperisano wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 12:45:05PM -0500, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
> > > Does anyone here know what happened to the LARTC list? It appears to
> > > have died Feb 18th, 2005.
> > i don't know what happened--but i can confirm that the last message i
> > received was 02-18-2005 @ 16:16.
> > -j
> > --
> 
> Does this list's topic overlap with the LARTC list? I understand that
> tc, ip and other such tools discussed in the LARTC world are interfaces
> to netfilter. But, if LARTC is never resurrected will I miss it if I
> start following this list?

That's not really accurate..  tc, ip and company aren't actually
interfaces to netfilter, iptables is.  LARTC also discusses ipsec stuff
more than is seen on these lists.  I don't know what happened to the
LARTC list but in general I do feel it's a seperate set of topics from
what's discussed here.

	Stephen

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [OT] LARTC list

[Eric Dantan Rzewnicki]

On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 01:18:55PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Eric Dantan Rzewnicki (rzewnickie@rfa.org) wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 12:57:36PM -0500, Jason Opperisano wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 12:45:05PM -0500, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
> > > > Does anyone here know what happened to the LARTC list? It appears to
> > > > have died Feb 18th, 2005.
> > > i don't know what happened--but i can confirm that the last message i
> > > received was 02-18-2005 @ 16:16.
> > > -j
> > Does this list's topic overlap with the LARTC list? I understand that
> > tc, ip and other such tools discussed in the LARTC world are interfaces
> > to netfilter. But, if LARTC is never resurrected will I miss it if I
> > start following this list?
> That's not really accurate..  tc, ip and company aren't actually
> interfaces to netfilter, iptables is.  LARTC also discusses ipsec stuff
> more than is seen on these lists.  I don't know what happened to the
> LARTC list but in general I do feel it's a seperate set of topics from
> what's discussed here.

Ah, right, my error. Thank you. I got confused between the netfilter
hooks and the kernel's routing tables.

Are there any other lists that fill the LARTC void?
-- 
Eric Dantan Rzewnicki  |  Systems Administrator
Technical Operations Division  |  Radio Free Asia
2025 M Street, NW  |  Washington, DC 20036  |  202-530-4900
CONFIDENTIAL COMMUNICATION
This e-mail message is intended only for the use of the addressee and
may contain information that is privileged and confidential. Any 
unauthorized dissemination, distribution, or copying is strictly 
prohibited. If you receive this transmission in error, please contact
network@rfa.org.

Re: [OT] LARTC list

[Andy Furniss]

Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
> Does anyone here know what happened to the LARTC list? It appears to
> have died Feb 18th, 2005.
> 
> Thanks,

It's died a few times recently, but bert will probably resurect it soon :-)

Andy.

Re: [OT] LARTC list

[Eric Dantan Rzewnicki]

On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 12:32:52AM +0000, Andy Furniss wrote:
> Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
> >Does anyone here know what happened to the LARTC list? It appears to
> >have died Feb 18th, 2005.
> >
> >Thanks,
> 
> It's died a few times recently, but bert will probably resurect it soon :-)

Ok. thanks for the info. Do you think he needs a new host? If so I can
offer mailman on techweb.rfa.org.
-- 
Eric Dantan Rzewnicki  |  Systems Administrator
Technical Operations Division  |  Radio Free Asia
2025 M Street, NW  |  Washington, DC 20036  |  202-530-4900
CONFIDENTIAL COMMUNICATION
This e-mail message is intended only for the use of the addressee and
may contain information that is privileged and confidential. Any 
unauthorized dissemination, distribution, or copying is strictly 
prohibited. If you receive this transmission in error, please contact
network@rfa.org.

Re: [OT] LARTC list

[Andy Furniss]

Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 12:32:52AM +0000, Andy Furniss wrote:
> 
>>Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
>>
>>>Does anyone here know what happened to the LARTC list? It appears to
>>>have died Feb 18th, 2005.
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>
>>It's died a few times recently, but bert will probably resurect it soon :-)
> 
> 
> Ok. thanks for the info. Do you think he needs a new host? If so I can
> offer mailman on techweb.rfa.org.

I don't know - maybe he's just busy. The only contact address I know is

ahu@ds9a.nl

Andy.

Re: [OT] LARTC list

[Thilo Schulz]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Friday 04 March 2005 18:45, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
> Does anyone here know what happened to the LARTC list? It appears to
> have died Feb 18th, 2005.

The lartc mailing list is back again.

from Bert Hubert:

> I finally caved in an did a full reinstall of Mailman. I nearly decided on
> rewriting the damn thing. Might do so later on hehe, but probably not.
>
> Biggest apologies to those users that had disabled delivery of our list. I
> have not found a way to retain user settings in this recovery. Our
> Mailman install was hosed so severely that nothing short of a complete purge
> would do the job.
>
> I apologise for the long delay in doing this. Furthermore, not everything is
> back, like the archives. Some details might be wrong. It is well possible
> that the archives will remain split. 
>
> Thanks to Wichert Akkerman for his services as 'Mailman doctor'!
>
> Let me know if anything is wrong. I've tried to retain important settings
> but I might've missed some things.

- -- 
Thilo Schulz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCMLOQZx4hBtWQhl4RArDKAKC+Q0MwBug6h5JAUSRCq/4gNDaYVgCePNeM
hRXUix0Vob8uuSCBp9dcjcM=
=PWmh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: [OT] LARTC list

[John A. Sullivan III]

On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 21:52 +0100, Thilo Schulz wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On Friday 04 March 2005 18:45, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
> > Does anyone here know what happened to the LARTC list? It appears to
> > have died Feb 18th, 2005.
> 
> The lartc mailing list is back again.
> 
> from Bert Hubert:
> 
> > I finally caved in an did a full reinstall of Mailman. I nearly decided on
> > rewriting the damn thing. Might do so later on hehe, but probably not.
> >
> > Biggest apologies to those users that had disabled delivery of our list. I
> > have not found a way to retain user settings in this recovery. Our
> > Mailman install was hosed so severely that nothing short of a complete purge
> > would do the job.
> >
> > I apologise for the long delay in doing this. Furthermore, not everything is
> > back, like the archives. Some details might be wrong. It is well possible
> > that the archives will remain split. 
> >
> > Thanks to Wichert Akkerman for his services as 'Mailman doctor'!
> >
> > Let me know if anything is wrong. I've tried to retain important settings
> > but I might've missed some things.
<snip>
Hmm . . . I just tried to subscribe and the web site link to subscribe
is a dead end - John
-- 
John A. Sullivan III
Open Source Development Corporation
+1 207-985-7880
jsullivan@opensourcedevel.com

If you would like to participate in the development of an open source
enterprise class network security management system, please visit
http://iscs.sourceforge.net