All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
To: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
Cc: Zdenek Radouch <zdenek@rcn.com>, Martin Mares <mj@ucw.cz>,
	netdev@oss.sgi.com, linux-net@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Do you know the TCP stack? (127.x.x.x routing)
Date: 6 Mar 2005 22:30:47 +0100
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2005 22:30:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050306213047.GA65970@muc.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050306204516.GR31837@postel.suug.ch>

On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 09:45:16PM +0100, Thomas Graf wrote:
> * Andi Kleen <m1y8d0mss2.fsf@muc.de> 2005-03-06 21:19
> > Zdenek Radouch <zdenek@rcn.com> writes:
> > >
> > > There is no doubt that the 127.x net is treated in a special
> > > way.  If I have to believe what I just learned, then the 127
> > 
> > It is. 127.* is hardcoded in the routing engine and e.g.
> > it won't accept outside packets with a loopback address.
> > 
> > Most likely it's enough to change the "LOOPBACK" macro to allow
> > parts of the Class A to be used for other purposes.
> 
> Yes, it will work around the martian route and arp checks but
> will probably break quite a few usersapce applications.

Unlikely. glibc has an own LOOPBACK() and all modern distributions
use separate kernel/user headers anyways.

-Andi

  reply	other threads:[~2005-03-06 21:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-06  2:20 Do you know the TCP stack? (127.x.x.x routing) Zdenek Radouch
2005-03-06  9:56 ` Martin Mares
2005-03-06 17:01   ` Zdenek Radouch
2005-03-06 17:12     ` alex
2005-03-06 17:31     ` Thomas Graf
2005-03-06 19:48       ` Zdenek Radouch
2005-03-06 20:19         ` alex
2005-03-06 20:19         ` Andi Kleen
2005-03-06 20:45           ` Thomas Graf
2005-03-06 21:30             ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2005-03-06 21:50               ` Thomas Graf
2005-03-06 21:50             ` Zdenek Radouch
2005-03-07  7:01               ` Sumit Pandya
2005-03-07  8:05               ` Eran Mann
2005-03-07 12:14                 ` jamal
2005-03-07 23:50                 ` jamal
2005-03-08  3:15                   ` Zdenek Radouch
2005-03-08 13:34                     ` jamal
2005-03-08 13:51                       ` Martin Mares
2005-03-08 13:58                         ` jamal
2005-03-08 14:03                           ` Martin Mares
2005-03-08 14:17                             ` jamal
2005-03-08 14:20                               ` Martin Mares
2005-03-08 18:40                               ` Henrik Nordstrom
2005-03-08 21:17                                 ` jamal
2005-03-09  9:09                                   ` Henrik Nordstrom
2005-03-09 12:39                                     ` jamal
2005-03-09 13:39                                       ` Zdenek Radouch
2005-03-09 14:18                                         ` jamal
2005-03-09 16:46                                           ` Jason Lunz
2005-03-10 10:10                                             ` Henrik Nordstrom
2005-03-09 17:52                                           ` Matt Mackall
2005-03-10  6:57                                             ` Catalin(ux aka Dino) BOIE
2005-03-09 22:34                                       ` Henrik Nordstrom
2005-03-10  1:47                                         ` Jamie Lokier
2005-03-08 18:34                       ` Henrik Nordstrom
2005-03-09  5:33                       ` Zdenek Radouch
2005-03-08 14:02                     ` Thomas Graf
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-03-08 15:07 Steve Iribarne
2005-03-09 15:01 Steve Iribarne
2005-03-09 16:00 ` jamal
2005-03-10  6:48 ` Catalin(ux aka Dino) BOIE
2005-03-09 17:33 Steve Iribarne
2005-03-09 19:40 ` jamal
2005-03-09 21:57 Steve Iribarne
2005-03-10  0:11 ` jamal
2005-03-09 23:51 Boian Bonev
2005-03-10  0:23 ` Jason Lunz
2005-03-10 14:35 Steve Iribarne
2005-03-10 14:49 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-03-10 15:04 Steve Iribarne
2005-03-10 15:25 ` Catalin(ux aka Dino) BOIE

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050306213047.GA65970@muc.de \
    --to=ak@muc.de \
    --cc=linux-net@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mj@ucw.cz \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
    --cc=zdenek@rcn.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.