All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
To: Henrik Nordstrom <hno@marasystems.com>
Cc: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>, Martin Mares <mj@ucw.cz>,
	Zdenek Radouch <zdenek@rcn.com>,
	Steve Iribarne <steve.iribarne@dilithiumnetworks.com>,
	Eran Mann <emann@mrv.com>, Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>,
	netdev@oss.sgi.com, linux-net@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Do you know the TCP stack? (127.x.x.x routing)
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 01:47:57 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050310014757.GC12990@mail.shareable.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0503091730280.16557@filer.marasystems.com>

Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> If Linux could manage different IP stacks per interface this would not be 
> a problem, but as it is today the same IP stack is used for all interfaces 
> making dual homing (not routing) a bit troublesome when the same addresses 
> may be in both networks..

Indeed, I have exactly the same problem with a device that must
simultaneously connect to:

     - the local customer-site ethernet
     - the local customer-site 802.11 wireless

and auto-configure both interfaces using DHCP to connect to hosts on
the internet as best as possible through all available interfaces.
There is absolutely no guarantee that I won't see a network or even
address conflict on the two interfaces, as they may be _separate_
networks each behind a NAT to the outside world over ADSL.

In fact, it's quite likely that DHCP for each interface will provide a
192.168.0.0/24 address, as that seems to be the typical setup of both
kinds of ADSL NAT router...

Any suggestion of asking customer-site to specially configure their
network rather defeats the point, which is a device which
automatically tries available connections, using DHCP, and routes its
traffic over whichever one works best at any time.

-- Jamie

  reply	other threads:[~2005-03-10  1:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-06  2:20 Do you know the TCP stack? (127.x.x.x routing) Zdenek Radouch
2005-03-06  9:56 ` Martin Mares
2005-03-06 17:01   ` Zdenek Radouch
2005-03-06 17:12     ` alex
2005-03-06 17:31     ` Thomas Graf
2005-03-06 19:48       ` Zdenek Radouch
2005-03-06 20:19         ` alex
2005-03-06 20:19         ` Andi Kleen
2005-03-06 20:45           ` Thomas Graf
2005-03-06 21:30             ` Andi Kleen
2005-03-06 21:50               ` Thomas Graf
2005-03-06 21:50             ` Zdenek Radouch
2005-03-07  7:01               ` Sumit Pandya
2005-03-07  8:05               ` Eran Mann
2005-03-07 12:14                 ` jamal
2005-03-07 23:50                 ` jamal
2005-03-08  3:15                   ` Zdenek Radouch
2005-03-08 13:34                     ` jamal
2005-03-08 13:51                       ` Martin Mares
2005-03-08 13:58                         ` jamal
2005-03-08 14:03                           ` Martin Mares
2005-03-08 14:17                             ` jamal
2005-03-08 14:20                               ` Martin Mares
2005-03-08 18:40                               ` Henrik Nordstrom
2005-03-08 21:17                                 ` jamal
2005-03-09  9:09                                   ` Henrik Nordstrom
2005-03-09 12:39                                     ` jamal
2005-03-09 13:39                                       ` Zdenek Radouch
2005-03-09 14:18                                         ` jamal
2005-03-09 16:46                                           ` Jason Lunz
2005-03-10 10:10                                             ` Henrik Nordstrom
2005-03-09 17:52                                           ` Matt Mackall
2005-03-10  6:57                                             ` Catalin(ux aka Dino) BOIE
2005-03-09 22:34                                       ` Henrik Nordstrom
2005-03-10  1:47                                         ` Jamie Lokier [this message]
2005-03-08 18:34                       ` Henrik Nordstrom
2005-03-09  5:33                       ` Zdenek Radouch
2005-03-08 14:02                     ` Thomas Graf
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-03-08 15:07 Steve Iribarne
2005-03-09 15:01 Steve Iribarne
2005-03-09 16:00 ` jamal
2005-03-10  6:48 ` Catalin(ux aka Dino) BOIE
2005-03-09 17:33 Steve Iribarne
2005-03-09 19:40 ` jamal
2005-03-09 21:57 Steve Iribarne
2005-03-10  0:11 ` jamal
2005-03-09 23:51 Boian Bonev
2005-03-10  0:23 ` Jason Lunz
2005-03-10 14:35 Steve Iribarne
2005-03-10 14:49 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-03-10 15:04 Steve Iribarne
2005-03-10 15:25 ` Catalin(ux aka Dino) BOIE

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050310014757.GC12990@mail.shareable.org \
    --to=jamie@shareable.org \
    --cc=ak@muc.de \
    --cc=emann@mrv.com \
    --cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
    --cc=hno@marasystems.com \
    --cc=linux-net@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mj@ucw.cz \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=steve.iribarne@dilithiumnetworks.com \
    --cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
    --cc=zdenek@rcn.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.