From: Pavel Machek <pavel-+ZI9xUNit7I@public.gmane.org>
To: kernel list
<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>
Cc: seife-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org,
ACPI mailing list
<acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org>
Subject: smp/swsusp done right
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 21:40:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050323204019.GA11616@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
Hi!
This is against -mm kernel; it is smp swsusp done right, and it
actually works for me. Unlike previous hacks, it uses cpu hotplug
infrastructure. Disable CONFIG_MTRR before you try this...
Test this if you can, and report any problems. If not enough people
scream, this is going to -mm.
Pavel
--- clean-mm/drivers/pci/pci.c 2005-03-21 11:39:32.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-mm/drivers/pci/pci.c 2005-03-22 01:41:48.000000000 +0100
@@ -376,11 +376,13 @@
if (!pci_find_capability(dev, PCI_CAP_ID_PM))
return PCI_D0;
+#if 0
if (platform_pci_choose_state) {
ret = platform_pci_choose_state(dev, state);
if (ret >= 0)
state = ret;
}
+#endif
switch (state) {
case 0: return PCI_D0;
case 3: return PCI_D3hot;
--- clean-mm/kernel/power/Kconfig 2005-01-22 21:24:53.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-mm/kernel/power/Kconfig 2005-03-23 11:40:14.000000000 +0100
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
config SOFTWARE_SUSPEND
bool "Software Suspend (EXPERIMENTAL)"
- depends on EXPERIMENTAL && PM && SWAP
+ depends on EXPERIMENTAL && PM && SWAP && (HOTPLUG_CPU || !SMP)
---help---
Enable the possibility of suspending the machine.
It doesn't need APM.
--- clean-mm/kernel/power/smp.c 2005-03-19 00:32:32.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-mm/kernel/power/smp.c 2005-03-23 15:38:30.000000000 +0100
@@ -7,79 +7,53 @@
* This file is released under the GPLv2.
*/
-#undef DEBUG
-
#include <linux/smp_lock.h>
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
#include <linux/suspend.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <asm/atomic.h>
#include <asm/tlbflush.h>
+#include <asm/cpu.h>
-static atomic_t cpu_counter, freeze;
-
-
-static void smp_pause(void * data)
-{
- struct saved_context ctxt;
- __save_processor_state(&ctxt);
- printk("Sleeping in:\n");
- dump_stack();
- atomic_inc(&cpu_counter);
- while (atomic_read(&freeze)) {
- /* FIXME: restore takes place at random piece inside this.
- This should probably be written in assembly, and
- preserve general-purpose registers, too
-
- What about stack? We may need to move to new stack here.
-
- This should better be ran with interrupts disabled.
- */
- cpu_relax();
- barrier();
- }
- atomic_dec(&cpu_counter);
- __restore_processor_state(&ctxt);
-}
-
-static cpumask_t oldmask;
+cpumask_t frozen_cpus;
void disable_nonboot_cpus(void)
{
- printk("Freezing CPUs (at %d)", smp_processor_id());
- oldmask = current->cpus_allowed;
- set_cpus_allowed(current, cpumask_of_cpu(0));
- current->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
- schedule_timeout(HZ);
- printk("...");
- BUG_ON(smp_processor_id() != 0);
-
- /* FIXME: for this to work, all the CPUs must be running
- * "idle" thread (or we deadlock). Is that guaranteed? */
+ int cpu, error;
- atomic_set(&cpu_counter, 0);
- atomic_set(&freeze, 1);
- smp_call_function(smp_pause, NULL, 0, 0);
- while (atomic_read(&cpu_counter) < (num_online_cpus() - 1)) {
- cpu_relax();
- barrier();
+ error = 0;
+ cpus_clear(frozen_cpus);
+ printk("Freezing cpus ...\n");
+ for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
+ if (cpu == 0)
+ continue;
+ error = cpu_down(cpu);
+ if (!error) {
+ cpu_set(cpu, frozen_cpus);
+ printk("CPU%d is down\n", cpu);
+ continue;
+ }
+ printk("Error taking cpu %d down: %d\n", cpu, error);
}
- printk("ok\n");
+ BUG_ON(smp_processor_id() != 0);
+ if (error)
+ panic("cpus not sleeping");
}
void enable_nonboot_cpus(void)
{
- printk("Restarting CPUs");
- atomic_set(&freeze, 0);
- while (atomic_read(&cpu_counter)) {
- cpu_relax();
- barrier();
- }
- printk("...");
- set_cpus_allowed(current, oldmask);
- schedule();
- printk("ok\n");
+ int cpu, error;
+ printk("Thawing cpus ...\n");
+ for_each_cpu_mask(cpu, frozen_cpus) {
+ if (cpu == 0)
+ continue;
+ error = cpu_up(cpu);
+ if (!error) {
+ printk("CPU%d is up\n", cpu);
+ continue;
+ }
+ printk("Error taking cpu %d up: %d\n", cpu, error);
+ panic("Not enough cpus");
+ }
}
-
-
--- clean-mm/kernel/power/swsusp.c 2005-03-21 11:39:33.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-mm/kernel/power/swsusp.c 2005-03-23 15:34:53.000000000 +0100
@@ -1194,8 +1194,11 @@
return "version";
if (strcmp(swsusp_info.uts.machine,system_utsname.machine))
return "machine";
+#if 0
+ /* We can't use number of CPUs when we use hotplug to remove them ;-))) */
if(swsusp_info.cpus != num_online_cpus())
return "number of cpus";
+#endif
return NULL;
}
--
People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers...
...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Microsoft Mobile & Embedded DevCon 2005
Attend MEDC 2005 May 9-12 in Vegas. Learn more about the latest Windows
Embedded(r) & Windows Mobile(tm) platforms, applications & content. Register
by 3/29 & save $300 http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6883&alloc_id=15149&op=click
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: seife@suse.de, ACPI mailing list <acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: smp/swsusp done right
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 21:40:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050323204019.GA11616@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
Hi!
This is against -mm kernel; it is smp swsusp done right, and it
actually works for me. Unlike previous hacks, it uses cpu hotplug
infrastructure. Disable CONFIG_MTRR before you try this...
Test this if you can, and report any problems. If not enough people
scream, this is going to -mm.
Pavel
--- clean-mm/drivers/pci/pci.c 2005-03-21 11:39:32.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-mm/drivers/pci/pci.c 2005-03-22 01:41:48.000000000 +0100
@@ -376,11 +376,13 @@
if (!pci_find_capability(dev, PCI_CAP_ID_PM))
return PCI_D0;
+#if 0
if (platform_pci_choose_state) {
ret = platform_pci_choose_state(dev, state);
if (ret >= 0)
state = ret;
}
+#endif
switch (state) {
case 0: return PCI_D0;
case 3: return PCI_D3hot;
--- clean-mm/kernel/power/Kconfig 2005-01-22 21:24:53.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-mm/kernel/power/Kconfig 2005-03-23 11:40:14.000000000 +0100
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
config SOFTWARE_SUSPEND
bool "Software Suspend (EXPERIMENTAL)"
- depends on EXPERIMENTAL && PM && SWAP
+ depends on EXPERIMENTAL && PM && SWAP && (HOTPLUG_CPU || !SMP)
---help---
Enable the possibility of suspending the machine.
It doesn't need APM.
--- clean-mm/kernel/power/smp.c 2005-03-19 00:32:32.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-mm/kernel/power/smp.c 2005-03-23 15:38:30.000000000 +0100
@@ -7,79 +7,53 @@
* This file is released under the GPLv2.
*/
-#undef DEBUG
-
#include <linux/smp_lock.h>
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
#include <linux/suspend.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <asm/atomic.h>
#include <asm/tlbflush.h>
+#include <asm/cpu.h>
-static atomic_t cpu_counter, freeze;
-
-
-static void smp_pause(void * data)
-{
- struct saved_context ctxt;
- __save_processor_state(&ctxt);
- printk("Sleeping in:\n");
- dump_stack();
- atomic_inc(&cpu_counter);
- while (atomic_read(&freeze)) {
- /* FIXME: restore takes place at random piece inside this.
- This should probably be written in assembly, and
- preserve general-purpose registers, too
-
- What about stack? We may need to move to new stack here.
-
- This should better be ran with interrupts disabled.
- */
- cpu_relax();
- barrier();
- }
- atomic_dec(&cpu_counter);
- __restore_processor_state(&ctxt);
-}
-
-static cpumask_t oldmask;
+cpumask_t frozen_cpus;
void disable_nonboot_cpus(void)
{
- printk("Freezing CPUs (at %d)", smp_processor_id());
- oldmask = current->cpus_allowed;
- set_cpus_allowed(current, cpumask_of_cpu(0));
- current->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
- schedule_timeout(HZ);
- printk("...");
- BUG_ON(smp_processor_id() != 0);
-
- /* FIXME: for this to work, all the CPUs must be running
- * "idle" thread (or we deadlock). Is that guaranteed? */
+ int cpu, error;
- atomic_set(&cpu_counter, 0);
- atomic_set(&freeze, 1);
- smp_call_function(smp_pause, NULL, 0, 0);
- while (atomic_read(&cpu_counter) < (num_online_cpus() - 1)) {
- cpu_relax();
- barrier();
+ error = 0;
+ cpus_clear(frozen_cpus);
+ printk("Freezing cpus ...\n");
+ for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
+ if (cpu == 0)
+ continue;
+ error = cpu_down(cpu);
+ if (!error) {
+ cpu_set(cpu, frozen_cpus);
+ printk("CPU%d is down\n", cpu);
+ continue;
+ }
+ printk("Error taking cpu %d down: %d\n", cpu, error);
}
- printk("ok\n");
+ BUG_ON(smp_processor_id() != 0);
+ if (error)
+ panic("cpus not sleeping");
}
void enable_nonboot_cpus(void)
{
- printk("Restarting CPUs");
- atomic_set(&freeze, 0);
- while (atomic_read(&cpu_counter)) {
- cpu_relax();
- barrier();
- }
- printk("...");
- set_cpus_allowed(current, oldmask);
- schedule();
- printk("ok\n");
+ int cpu, error;
+ printk("Thawing cpus ...\n");
+ for_each_cpu_mask(cpu, frozen_cpus) {
+ if (cpu == 0)
+ continue;
+ error = cpu_up(cpu);
+ if (!error) {
+ printk("CPU%d is up\n", cpu);
+ continue;
+ }
+ printk("Error taking cpu %d up: %d\n", cpu, error);
+ panic("Not enough cpus");
+ }
}
-
-
--- clean-mm/kernel/power/swsusp.c 2005-03-21 11:39:33.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-mm/kernel/power/swsusp.c 2005-03-23 15:34:53.000000000 +0100
@@ -1194,8 +1194,11 @@
return "version";
if (strcmp(swsusp_info.uts.machine,system_utsname.machine))
return "machine";
+#if 0
+ /* We can't use number of CPUs when we use hotplug to remove them ;-))) */
if(swsusp_info.cpus != num_online_cpus())
return "number of cpus";
+#endif
return NULL;
}
--
People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers...
...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!
next reply other threads:[~2005-03-23 20:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-23 20:40 Pavel Machek [this message]
2005-03-23 20:40 ` smp/swsusp done right Pavel Machek
2005-03-30 10:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-03-30 11:32 ` Pavel Machek
2005-03-30 21:13 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.61.0503301413050.12965-SOP5cCwKKQRMCHjbocvOOJqQE7yCjDx5@public.gmane.org>
2005-03-30 21:22 ` Pavel Machek
2005-03-30 21:22 ` Pavel Machek
2005-03-30 21:44 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050323204019.GA11616@elf.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel-+zi9xunit7i@public.gmane.org \
--cc=acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org \
--cc=seife-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.