Re: [2.6 patch] drivers/input/serio/libps2.c: ps2_command: add a missing check

[Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>]

On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 12:13:16AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Wednesday 23 March 2005 22:14, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > The Coverity checker noted that while all other uses of param in 
> > ps2_command() were guarded by a NULL check, this one wasn't.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
> > 
> > --- linux-2.6.12-rc1-mm1-full/drivers/input/serio/libps2.c.old	2005-03-24 02:37:08.000000000 +0100
> > +++ linux-2.6.12-rc1-mm1-full/drivers/input/serio/libps2.c	2005-03-24 02:38:28.000000000 +0100
> > @@ -106,9 +106,10 @@ int ps2_command(struct ps2dev *ps2dev, u
> >  			command == PS2_CMD_RESET_BAT ? 1000 : 200))
> >  			goto out;
> >  
> > -	for (i = 0; i < send; i++)
> > -		if (ps2_sendbyte(ps2dev, param[i], 200))
> > -			goto out;
> > +	if (param)
> > +		for (i = 0; i < send; i++)
> > +			if (ps2_sendbyte(ps2dev, param[i], 200))
> > +				goto out;
> >  
> 
> I somewhat disagree on this one. If caller specified that command requires
> arguments to be sent and it does not provide them I'd rather had it OOPS on
> the spot. With receiving, however, caller does not really have control over
> number of characters coming from the device so specifying NULL allows just
> ignore whatever response there is.

Understood.

Could this be handled with a BUG_ON?

> Dmitry

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed