From: "Yu, Luming" <luming.yu-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org,
romano-1BxYRfzsdQW8A8a7gxElqg@public.gmane.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm-3NddpPZAyC0@public.gmane.org>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, "Li,
Shaohua" <shaohua.li-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: Re: [BKPATCH] ACPI for 2.6.12-rc1
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 14:09:00 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200503301409.00785.luming.yu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050329081321.GA4133-NfIQswJzSEaq9fEpoSJUslHdEuJhDOxL@public.gmane.org>
On Tuesday 29 March 2005 16:13, Romano Giannetti wrote:
> This is to report an issue with 2.6.11 and ACPI battery/ac. The resume is:
> acpi battery with preemptive kernel do not work, while the same kernel
> with no preempt works ok. I have tried to collect all the possible info;
> tell me if you need something more.
>
> The details:
>
> The working kernel is 2.6.11 with the patch from the acpi-devel list to
> fix acpi keys (not working otherwise). See for a description
> http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4124
If you can find AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT in your long, then, it should be
interpreter bug. please see http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4150
Otherwise, maybe it is related to EC driver.
--
Thanks,
Luming
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Yu, Luming" <luming.yu@intel.com>
To: acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, <romano@dea.icai.upco.es>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@osdl.org>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Li, Shaohua" <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [ACPI] Re: [BKPATCH] ACPI for 2.6.12-rc1
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 14:09:00 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200503301409.00785.luming.yu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050329081321.GA4133@pern.dea.icai.upco.es>
On Tuesday 29 March 2005 16:13, Romano Giannetti wrote:
> This is to report an issue with 2.6.11 and ACPI battery/ac. The resume is:
> acpi battery with preemptive kernel do not work, while the same kernel
> with no preempt works ok. I have tried to collect all the possible info;
> tell me if you need something more.
>
> The details:
>
> The working kernel is 2.6.11 with the patch from the acpi-devel list to
> fix acpi keys (not working otherwise). See for a description
> http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4124
If you can find AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT in your long, then, it should be
interpreter bug. please see http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4150
Otherwise, maybe it is related to EC driver.
--
Thanks,
Luming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-30 6:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-18 6:23 [BKPATCH] ACPI for 2.6.12-rc1 Len Brown
2005-03-18 6:23 ` Len Brown
2005-03-18 15:01 ` Romano Giannetti
[not found] ` <20050318150129.GB22887-NfIQswJzSEaq9fEpoSJUslHdEuJhDOxL@public.gmane.org>
2005-03-18 23:21 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-18 23:21 ` Andrew Morton
[not found] ` <20050318152122.7994965b.akpm-3NddpPZAyC0@public.gmane.org>
2005-03-19 2:47 ` Len Brown
2005-03-19 2:47 ` Len Brown
2005-03-19 3:19 ` Sérgio Monteiro Basto
2005-03-19 3:19 ` [ACPI] " Sérgio Monteiro Basto
[not found] ` <20050319215239.GA5105@rukbat.dea.icai.upco.es>
[not found] ` <20050319215239.GA5105-Mk09lrvUCGu3zQnsjjvIQaryH+tG7pLP@public.gmane.org>
2005-03-29 8:13 ` Romano Giannetti
2005-03-29 8:13 ` Romano Giannetti
[not found] ` <20050329081321.GA4133-NfIQswJzSEaq9fEpoSJUslHdEuJhDOxL@public.gmane.org>
2005-03-30 6:09 ` Yu, Luming [this message]
2005-03-30 6:09 ` [ACPI] " Yu, Luming
[not found] ` <200503301409.00785.luming.yu-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2005-03-31 14:59 ` Romano Giannetti
2005-03-31 14:59 ` [ACPI] " Romano Giannetti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200503301409.00785.luming.yu@intel.com \
--to=luming.yu-ral2jqcrhueavxtiumwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
--cc=akpm-3NddpPZAyC0@public.gmane.org \
--cc=len.brown-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=romano-1BxYRfzsdQW8A8a7gxElqg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=shaohua.li-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.