Re: [RFC] re-queuing usx2y-fw

[Martin Langer <martin-langer@gmx.de>]

On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 12:52:56PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Fri, 1 Apr 2005 12:33:48 +0200,
> Martin Langer wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 06:03:41PM +0200, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
> > > Martin Langer <martin-langer@gmx.de> writes:
> > > 
> > > > http://wiki.erazor-zone.de/doku.php?id=wiki:projects:linux:as31
> > > 
> > > why not auto enabling it if we detect the non free as31 rather than
> > > just providing such flag?
> > 
> > Is it really necessary to build it by default? I see a lot of trouble at 
> > the horizon due to version mismatches of as31. An as31 version check 
> > could solve it, though.
> 
> Agreed.  The resultant firmware should be 100% identical even if you
> build by yourself.  Hence I don't think it's needed so much.

Controlling a checksum could solve that. md5sum? That would result in a 
table of as31 version and their related checksum. If someone wants to 
write it, go ahead :)

martin


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Demarc:
A global provider of Threat Management Solutions.
Download our HomeAdmin security software for free today!
http://www.demarc.com/Info/Sentarus/hamr30