From: Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Andrei Konovalov <akonovalov@ru.mvista.com>
Cc: Jon Masters <jonathan@jonmasters.org>,
Sylvain Munaut <tnt@246tNt.com>,
Linux PPC Embedded list <linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org>,
Jakob Viketoft <jakob.viketoft@bitsim.se>
Subject: Re: Flat OF Device Tree for ppc32 [was: Platform bus/ppc sys model...]
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 10:20:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050407172003.GP3396@smtp.west.cox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42511D55.4040507@ru.mvista.com>
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 02:56:21PM +0400, Andrei Konovalov wrote:
> Should we rely on U-Boot to give that device tree structure to
> the kernel? If I got it correct this is how the Freescale team
It shouldn't matter who passes the flattened tree really, so long as the
information is correct. arch/ppc/boot/simple/ should translate
older-non-uboot-bd_t, or PReP residual, or statically construct, or
some combination, into the tree and pass it in. U-Boot (or yaboot or
grub or whatever) can just pass it right to the kernel.
Part of the point of this is to move to a defined interface :)
--
Tom Rini
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-07 17:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-30 8:00 Platform bus/ppc sys model Jakob Viketoft
2005-03-30 9:54 ` Sylvain Munaut
2005-03-30 13:52 ` Andrei Konovalov
2005-03-30 15:06 ` Kumar Gala
2005-03-30 16:12 ` Jakob Viketoft
2005-03-30 17:26 ` Kumar Gala
2005-03-31 12:33 ` Jon Masters
2005-03-31 15:55 ` Flat OF Device Tree for ppc32 [was: Platform bus/ppc sys model...] Jon Loeliger
2005-04-04 7:20 ` Jakob Viketoft
2005-04-04 7:31 ` Jon Masters
2005-04-04 10:56 ` Andrei Konovalov
2005-04-04 11:01 ` Jon Masters
2005-04-04 11:08 ` Jakob Viketoft
2005-04-04 16:45 ` Wolfgang Denk
2005-04-04 16:58 ` Andrei Konovalov
2005-04-04 16:56 ` Jon Masters
2005-04-07 17:20 ` Tom Rini [this message]
2005-04-07 17:35 ` Jon Loeliger
2005-04-07 17:49 ` Tom Rini
2005-04-11 15:58 ` Jon Loeliger
2005-04-14 9:54 ` Jakob Viketoft
2005-04-15 14:22 ` Jon Loeliger
2005-04-22 17:33 ` Andrei Konovalov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050407172003.GP3396@smtp.west.cox.net \
--to=trini@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=akonovalov@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=jakob.viketoft@bitsim.se \
--cc=jonathan@jonmasters.org \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org \
--cc=tnt@246tNt.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.