From: Tom Lord <lord@emf.net>
To: duchier@ps.uni-sb.de
Cc: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org, gnu-arch-dev@lists.seyza.com,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] /Arch/ embraces `git'
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 16:04:00 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200504202304.QAA17069@emf.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877jixfjxw.fsf@star.lifl.fr> (duchier@ps.uni-sb.de)
From: duchier@ps.uni-sb.de
Thank you for your experiment. I'm not surprised by the
result but it is very nice to know that my expectations
are right.
I think that to a large extent you are seeing artifacts
of the questionable trade-offs that (reports tell me) the
ext* filesystems make. With a different filesystem, the
results would be very different.
I'm imagining a blob database containing may revisions of the linux
kernel. It will contain millions of blobs.
It's fine that some filesystems and some blob operations work fine
on a directory with millions of files but what about other operations
on the database? I pity the poor program that has to `readdir' through
millions of files.
That said: I may add an optional flat-directory format to my library,
just to avoid issues such as those you raise over the next couple
years.
-t
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-20 23:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-20 10:00 [ANNOUNCEMENT] /Arch/ embraces `git' Tom Lord
2005-04-20 10:19 ` Miles Bader
2005-04-20 17:15 ` duchier
2005-04-20 22:40 ` [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [GNU-arch-dev] " Tomas Mraz
2005-04-21 9:09 ` Denys Duchier
2005-04-21 10:21 ` Tomas Mraz
2005-04-21 11:46 ` [Gnu-arch-users] " duchier
2005-04-20 22:51 ` Tomas Mraz
2005-04-21 19:04 ` Tom Lord
2005-04-21 20:35 ` [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [GNU-arch-dev] " Tom Lord
2005-04-20 23:04 ` Tom Lord [this message]
2005-04-21 0:05 ` Denys Duchier
2005-04-21 20:39 ` [Gnu-arch-users] " Tom Lord
2005-04-21 7:49 ` Tomas Mraz
2005-04-21 21:51 ` [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [GNU-arch-dev] " Tom Lord
2005-04-21 21:52 ` Tom Lord
2005-04-22 16:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-22 17:39 ` Edésio Costa e Silva
2005-04-20 21:31 ` Petr Baudis
2005-04-20 21:55 ` C. Scott Ananian
2005-04-20 22:22 ` chunking (Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] /Arch/ embraces `git') Linus Torvalds
2005-04-20 23:42 ` C. Scott Ananian
2005-04-22 21:02 ` blowing chunks (quick update) C. Scott Ananian
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-04-20 9:58 [ANNOUNCEMENT] /Arch/ embraces `git' Tom Lord
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200504202304.QAA17069@emf.net \
--to=lord@emf.net \
--cc=duchier@ps.uni-sb.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gnu-arch-dev@lists.seyza.com \
--cc=gnu-arch-users@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.