All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lord <lord@emf.net>
To: t8m@centrum.cz
Cc: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org, gnu-arch-dev@lists.seyza.com,
	git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [GNU-arch-dev] [ANNOUNCEMENT] /Arch/ embraces `git'
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 14:51:45 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200504212151.OAA07558@emf.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1114069758.5886.9.camel@perun.redhat.usu> (message from Tomas Mraz on Thu, 21 Apr 2005 09:49:18 +0200)



   > Tom, please stop this ext* filesystem bashing ;-) 

For one thing... yes, i'm totally embarassed on this issue.
I made a late-night math error in a spec.  *hopefully* would
have noticed it on my own as I coded to that spec but y'all
have been wonderful at pointing out my mistake to me even 
though I initially defended it.

As for ext* bashing.... it's not bashing exactly.  I/O bandwidth
gets a little better, disks get a bunch cheaper --- then ext* 
doesn't look bad at all in this respect.  And we're awefully close
to that point.   

Meanwhile, for times measured in years, I've gotten complaints from
ext* users about software that is just fine on other filesystems
over issues like the allocation size of small files.

So ext*, from my perspective, was a little too far ahead of its time
and, yes, my complaints about it are just about reaching their
expiration date.

Anyway, thanks for all the sanity about directory layout.  Really,
it was just an "I'm too sleepy to be doing this right now" error.

-t


  reply	other threads:[~2005-04-21 21:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-04-20 10:00 [ANNOUNCEMENT] /Arch/ embraces `git' Tom Lord
2005-04-20 10:19 ` Miles Bader
2005-04-20 17:15 ` duchier
2005-04-20 22:40   ` [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [GNU-arch-dev] " Tomas Mraz
2005-04-21  9:09     ` Denys Duchier
2005-04-21 10:21       ` Tomas Mraz
2005-04-21 11:46         ` [Gnu-arch-users] " duchier
2005-04-20 22:51   ` Tomas Mraz
2005-04-21 19:04     ` Tom Lord
2005-04-21 20:35     ` [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [GNU-arch-dev] " Tom Lord
2005-04-20 23:04   ` Tom Lord
2005-04-21  0:05     ` [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [GNU-arch-dev] " Denys Duchier
2005-04-21 20:39       ` [Gnu-arch-users] " Tom Lord
2005-04-21  7:49     ` Tomas Mraz
2005-04-21 21:51       ` Tom Lord [this message]
2005-04-21 21:52       ` [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [GNU-arch-dev] " Tom Lord
2005-04-22 16:13       ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-22 17:39         ` Edésio Costa e Silva
2005-04-20 21:31 ` Petr Baudis
2005-04-20 21:55   ` C. Scott Ananian
2005-04-20 22:22     ` chunking (Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] /Arch/ embraces `git') Linus Torvalds
2005-04-20 23:42       ` C. Scott Ananian
2005-04-22 21:02       ` blowing chunks (quick update) C. Scott Ananian

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200504212151.OAA07558@emf.net \
    --to=lord@emf.net \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gnu-arch-dev@lists.seyza.com \
    --cc=gnu-arch-users@gnu.org \
    --cc=t8m@centrum.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.