Merging status.

Merging status.

[Dave Jones]

So, I've finally got around to extracting the bits that were
in the cpufreq bitkeeper tree, and exported them all as
GNU diffs for the time being.

These will go off to Linus pretty soon.

I'll set up a script to auto-mirror cpufreq changes that
I've got queued for merging. They'll appear at
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/projects/cpufreq/pending-patches/
Treat this directory the same as you treated
"merged into cpufreq-bk".
(Ie, Andrew can just set up a wget -r on this dir for each -mm
 [theres also a http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/projects/agp/pending-patches/
 for Andrews info])

I may look into using git at a later time, but right now its
probably going to be easier to just throw patches around.

		Dave

Re: Merging status.

[Dave Jones]

[fixed up the Cc list which I botched]

On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 02:45:40PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
 > Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> wrote:
 > >
 > > http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/projects/cpufreq/pending-patches/
 > > http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/projects/agp/pending-patches/
 > 
 > No probs.  I'm already doing that for ALSA patches.
 > 
 > Please make sure the patches alphasort into applying order, or, when you
 > start using quilt (you should!), include the series file.

They're of the form CPUFREQ-nn where nn is the numerical order they
should be applied in. (Though this time around, we're lucky, they're
all independant anyway I think)

		Dave

Re: Merging status.

[Andrew Morton]

Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> [fixed up the Cc list which I botched]
> 
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 02:45:40PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>  > Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> wrote:
>  > >
>  > > http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/projects/cpufreq/pending-patches/
>  > > http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/projects/agp/pending-patches/
>  > 
>  > No probs.  I'm already doing that for ALSA patches.
>  > 
>  > Please make sure the patches alphasort into applying order, or, when you
>  > start using quilt (you should!), include the series file.
> 
> They're of the form CPUFREQ-nn where nn is the numerical order they
> should be applied in.

Yeah, I always found that to be a bit unweildy.  Whatever.

For some bizarre reason, your http server manages to break wget.

	wget -r http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/projects/cpufreq/pending-patches

doesn't fetch the patches.  Confused.

Re: Merging status.

[Andrew Morton]

Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:
>
> For some bizarre reason, your http server manages to break wget.
> 
> 	wget -r http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/projects/cpufreq/pending-patches
> 
> doesn't fetch the patches.  Confused.

Still confused, but with mpm's help, managed to work out that

	lftp -e "mget *" "$URL" < /dev/null

did the trick.

Re: Merging status.

[Dave Jones]

On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 03:40:33PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
 > Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> wrote:
 > >
 > > [fixed up the Cc list which I botched]
 > > 
 > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 02:45:40PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
 > >  > Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> wrote:
 > >  > >
 > >  > > http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/projects/cpufreq/pending-patches/
 > >  > > http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/projects/agp/pending-patches/
 > >  > 
 > >  > No probs.  I'm already doing that for ALSA patches.
 > >  > 
 > >  > Please make sure the patches alphasort into applying order, or, when you
 > >  > start using quilt (you should!), include the series file.
 > > 
 > > They're of the form CPUFREQ-nn where nn is the numerical order they
 > > should be applied in.
 > 
 > Yeah, I always found that to be a bit unweildy.  Whatever.
 > 
 > For some bizarre reason, your http server manages to break wget.
 > 
 > 	wget -r http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/projects/cpufreq/pending-patches
 > 
 > doesn't fetch the patches.  Confused.

Fixed.

		Dave

Re: Merging status.

[Andrew Morton]

Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>  > For some bizarre reason, your http server manages to break wget.
>  > 
>  > 	wget -r http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/projects/cpufreq/pending-patches
>  > 
>  > doesn't fetch the patches.  Confused.
> 
> Fixed.

What was the cause?

(I might stick with lftp anyway - seems quicker, is less noisy and `wget
-r' has a habit of wanting to fetch the entire internet).

Re: Merging status.

[Dave Jones]

On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 05:09:49PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
 > Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> wrote:
 > >
 > >  > For some bizarre reason, your http server manages to break wget.
 > >  > 
 > >  > 	wget -r http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/projects/cpufreq/pending-patches
 > >  > 
 > >  > doesn't fetch the patches.  Confused.
 > > 
 > > Fixed.
 > 
 > What was the cause?
 > 
 > (I might stick with lftp anyway - seems quicker, is less noisy and `wget
 > -r' has a habit of wanting to fetch the entire internet).

shonky robots.txt
wget has a handy -np option btw to stop it recursing past the parent
and doing stupid things.

		Dave