From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: blaisorblade@yahoo.it
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, jdike@addtoit.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, ak@suse.de
Subject: [uml-devel] Re: [patch 1/1] x86_64: make string func definition work as intended
Date: Mon, 2 May 2005 18:41:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050502164114.GG7342@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050501190851.5FD5B45EBB@zion>
> I agree this can be a bit kludgy, so if you want add another solution.
Patch is ok for me, but you have a good chance of having broken
other archs too due to the string.c changes. Probably needs some testing.
-Andi
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games.
Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4
opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to
win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: blaisorblade@yahoo.it
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, jdike@addtoit.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, ak@suse.de
Subject: Re: [patch 1/1] x86_64: make string func definition work as intended
Date: Mon, 2 May 2005 18:41:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050502164114.GG7342@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050501190851.5FD5B45EBB@zion>
> I agree this can be a bit kludgy, so if you want add another solution.
Patch is ok for me, but you have a good chance of having broken
other archs too due to the string.c changes. Probably needs some testing.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-02 16:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-01 19:08 [uml-devel] [patch 1/1] x86_64: make string func definition work as intended blaisorblade
2005-05-01 19:08 ` blaisorblade
2005-05-02 16:41 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2005-05-02 16:41 ` Andi Kleen
[not found] ` <20050501155327.GX3592@stusta.de>
2005-05-02 19:36 ` Setting the hardware clock together with the system one(was: Re: [patch 1/1] x86_64: make string func definition work as intended) Blaisorblade
2005-05-02 22:00 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-05-03 7:21 ` [uml-devel] Re: [patch 1/1] x86_64: make string func definition work as intended Andrew Morton
2005-05-03 7:21 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050502164114.GG7342@wotan.suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=blaisorblade@yahoo.it \
--cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.