From: Grant Grundler <grundler@parisc-linux.org>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Cc: Grant Grundler <grundler@parisc-linux.org>,
akpm@osdl.org, T-Bone@parisc-linux.org, varenet@parisc-linux.org,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Netdev <netdev@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: patch tulip-natsemi-dp83840a-phy-fix.patch added to -mm tree
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 16:26:12 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050516222612.GD9282@colo.lackof.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4288CE51.1050703@pobox.com>
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 12:46:09PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Simply ensure that tulip_select_media() is always called from a process
> context. Then can you delay all you want. Several of the calls are
> already this way, so that leaves two cases:
>
> 1) called from timer context, from the media poll timer
>
> 2) called from spin_lock_irqsave() context, in the ->tx_timeout hook.
>
> The first case can be fixed by moved all the timer code to a workqueue.
> Then when the existing timer fires, kick the workqueue.
>
> The second case can be fixed by kicking the workqueue upon tx_timeout
> (which is the reason why I did not suggest queue_delayed_work() use).
Thanks - the above guidance has much more detail than you offered before
and is much more useful.
Too bad that schedule_timeout() was the only option at the time. :^(
And I apologize I don't recall what the issues were with schedule_timeout().
I suspect they will rear their ugly head with the workqueue
implementation as well. But if they don't, that will be great.
> See, it's not rocket science :)
Well, then it's a great opportunity for someone interested in hacking
NIC drivers to cut their teeth on. :^)
After three years of using/maintaining the (trivial) tulip patch
in parisc-linux tree (and shipped with RH/SuSe ia64 releases),
I don't recall anyone complaining that udelays in tulip phy reset
caused them problems. Sorry, I'm unmotivated to revisit this.
Convince someone else to make tulip to use workqueues and I'll
resubmit a clean patch on top of that for the phy init sequences.
thanks,
grant
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-16 22:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200505101955.j4AJtX9x032464@shell0.pdx.osdl.net>
2005-05-16 4:06 ` patch tulip-natsemi-dp83840a-phy-fix.patch added to -mm tree Jeff Garzik
2005-05-16 5:08 ` Grant Grundler
2005-05-16 16:46 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-16 22:26 ` Grant Grundler [this message]
2005-05-20 18:58 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-20 19:15 ` Francois Romieu
2005-05-20 21:12 ` Grant Grundler
2005-05-20 21:34 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-21 0:51 ` Grant Grundler
2005-05-21 22:39 ` Francois Romieu
2005-05-22 4:56 ` Grant Grundler
2005-05-27 2:16 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-27 7:17 ` Francois Romieu
2005-10-04 13:18 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-10-04 13:18 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050516222612.GD9282@colo.lackof.org \
--to=grundler@parisc-linux.org \
--cc=T-Bone@parisc-linux.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=varenet@parisc-linux.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.