[lm-sensors] [PATCH 2.6.12-rc5-mm1 0/3] i2c: new sysfs class "hwmon"

[lm-sensors] [PATCH 2.6.12-rc5-mm1 0/3] i2c: new sysfs class "hwmon"

[Mark M. Hoffman]

Hi Greg:

Here's the hwmon patchset again; this time I would like you to consider
applying it.  The device class ID string is now chosen by the (chip) driver.
That required a small change to the driver/core class code, which is the
first patch.  The third patch modifies all hwmon-type drivers, instead of
just a couple.  Also, thanks for your comments re: my previous patchset -
I've addressed those here.

With these patches applied, 'tree -d /sys/class/hwmon' looks like this:

/sys/class/hwmon
`-- w83627thf-0
    `-- device -> ../../../devices/platform/i2c-1/1-0290

Here is the diffstat:

 drivers/Kconfig                |    2 +
 drivers/Makefile               |    1 
 drivers/base/class.c           |   25 ++++++++++++-
 drivers/hwmon/Kconfig          |   15 +++++++
 drivers/hwmon/Makefile         |    5 ++
 drivers/hwmon/hwmon.c          |   77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/i2c/chips/adm1021.c    |   15 +++++++
 drivers/i2c/chips/adm1025.c    |   15 +++++++
 drivers/i2c/chips/adm1026.c    |   14 +++++++
 drivers/i2c/chips/adm1031.c    |   15 +++++++
 drivers/i2c/chips/adm9240.c    |   16 ++++++++
 drivers/i2c/chips/asb100.c     |   17 +++++++++
 drivers/i2c/chips/ds1621.c     |   15 +++++++
 drivers/i2c/chips/fscher.c     |   15 +++++++
 drivers/i2c/chips/fscpos.c     |   15 +++++++
 drivers/i2c/chips/gl518sm.c    |   15 +++++++
 drivers/i2c/chips/gl520sm.c    |   15 +++++++
 drivers/i2c/chips/it87.c       |   16 +++++++-
 drivers/i2c/chips/lm63.c       |   15 +++++++
 drivers/i2c/chips/lm75.c       |   14 +++++++
 drivers/i2c/chips/lm77.c       |   15 +++++++
 drivers/i2c/chips/lm78.c       |   15 +++++++
 drivers/i2c/chips/lm80.c       |   15 +++++++
 drivers/i2c/chips/lm83.c       |   15 +++++++
 drivers/i2c/chips/lm85.c       |   14 +++++++
 drivers/i2c/chips/lm87.c       |   15 +++++++
 drivers/i2c/chips/lm90.c       |   15 +++++++
 drivers/i2c/chips/lm92.c       |   16 +++++++-
 drivers/i2c/chips/max1619.c    |   16 +++++++-
 drivers/i2c/chips/pc87360.c    |   15 +++++++
 drivers/i2c/chips/sis5595.c    |   17 ++++++++-
 drivers/i2c/chips/smsc47b397.c |   15 +++++++
 drivers/i2c/chips/smsc47m1.c   |   16 ++++++++
 drivers/i2c/chips/via686a.c    |   23 ++++++++++--
 drivers/i2c/chips/w83627ehf.c  |   15 +++++++
 drivers/i2c/chips/w83627hf.c   |   15 +++++++
 drivers/i2c/chips/w83781d.c    |   23 ++++++++++++
 drivers/i2c/chips/w83l785ts.c  |   15 +++++++
 include/linux/device.h         |    7 +++
 include/linux/hwmon.h          |   24 ++++++++++++
 include/linux/i2c.h            |    1 
 41 files changed, 647 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

Regards,

-- 
Mark M. Hoffman
mhoffman@lightlink.com

[lm-sensors] [PATCH 2.6.12-rc5-mm1 0/3] i2c: new sysfs class

[Grant Coady]

On Wed, 1 Jun 2005 23:28:40 -0400, "Mark M. Hoffman" <mhoffman@lightlink.com> wrote:
>With these patches applied, 'tree -d /sys/class/hwmon' looks like this:
>
>/sys/class/hwmon
>`-- w83627thf-0
              ^^-- is it possible / make any sense, to not append anything 
                   for the first (usually only) device? eg. "", "-1", "-2"...
>    `-- device -> ../../../devices/platform/i2c-1/1-0290

--Grant.

[lm-sensors] Re: [PATCH 2.6.12-rc5-mm1 0/3] i2c: new sysfs class

[Greg KH]

On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 11:28:40PM -0400, Mark M. Hoffman wrote:
> Hi Greg:
> 
> Here's the hwmon patchset again; this time I would like you to consider
> applying it.  The device class ID string is now chosen by the (chip) driver.
> That required a small change to the driver/core class code, which is the
> first patch.  The third patch modifies all hwmon-type drivers, instead of
> just a couple.  Also, thanks for your comments re: my previous patchset -
> I've addressed those here.

Nice, I've added them to my tree, and will show up in the next -mm
releases.  If you want to send me updated patches, just let me know.  If
you want to send add-on patches, also, feel free to.  I'll hold off
sending this to Linus till after 2.6.12 is out, and after you feel more
comfortable with the code.

I do have a few issues, and will reply to the patches.

thanks,

greg k-h