* Re: gcc 4.0.0 and xen-devel [not found] <20050607200837.GH3554@conectiva.com.br> @ 2005-06-08 13:20 ` David F Barrera 2005-06-08 16:02 ` [Xen-users] " David F Barrera 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: David F Barrera @ 2005-06-08 13:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: xen-users, xen-devel On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 17:08 -0300, Flavio Leitner wrote: > > Hello! > > I tried to compile xen 2.0.6 with gcc 4.0.0 and got lots of warnings > like: > > 'warning: pointer targets in passing argument X of 'function' differ in > signedness' > I am seeing the same thing on xen-unstable (xen devel 3.0) and GCC 4.0.0 on a FC4 platform. I submitted a defect on the Xensource Bugzilla, "Bugzilla Bug 73 gcc4 build break ...", to track this issue. > Is there any intention of compile xen stable/unstable with gcc 4.0.0? > > Thanks! -- Regards, David F Barrera Linux Technology Center Systems and Technology Group, IBM "The wisest men follow their own direction. " Euripides ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [Xen-users] gcc 4.0.0 and xen-devel 2005-06-08 13:20 ` gcc 4.0.0 and xen-devel David F Barrera @ 2005-06-08 16:02 ` David F Barrera 2005-06-09 13:13 ` Flavio Leitner 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: David F Barrera @ 2005-06-08 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: xen-users, xen-devel This problem has been corrected. Fix is in the latest BK source tree. On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 08:20 -0500, David F Barrera wrote: > On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 17:08 -0300, Flavio Leitner wrote: > > > > Hello! > > > > I tried to compile xen 2.0.6 with gcc 4.0.0 and got lots of warnings > > like: > > > > 'warning: pointer targets in passing argument X of 'function' differ in > > signedness' > > > I am seeing the same thing on xen-unstable (xen devel 3.0) and GCC 4.0.0 > on a FC4 platform. > I submitted a defect on the Xensource Bugzilla, "Bugzilla Bug 73 > gcc4 build break ...", to track this issue. > > > Is there any intention of compile xen stable/unstable with gcc 4.0.0? > > > > Thanks! -- Regards, David F Barrera Linux Technology Center Systems and Technology Group, IBM "The wisest men follow their own direction. " Euripides ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: gcc 4.0.0 and xen-devel 2005-06-08 16:02 ` [Xen-users] " David F Barrera @ 2005-06-09 13:13 ` Flavio Leitner 2005-06-09 13:55 ` [Xen-devel] " Flavio Leitner 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Flavio Leitner @ 2005-06-09 13:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David F Barrera; +Cc: xen-devel, xen-users I checkout bktree from bk://xen.bkbits.net/xeno-unstable.bk and now I'm getting these messages: make world or make dist <snip> gcc -nostdinc -fno-builtin -fno-common -fno-strict-aliasing -iwithprefix include -Wall -Werror -Wno-pointer-arith -pipe -I/home/fbl/xeno-unstable.bk/xen/include -I/home/fbl/xeno-unstable.bk/xen/include/asm-x86/mach-generic -I/home/fbl/xeno-unstable.bk/xen/include/asm-x86/mach-default -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -msoft-float -m32 -march=i686 -DNDEBUG -c i8259.c -o i8259.o {standard input}: Assembler messages: {standard input}:6: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov' {standard input}:6: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov' {standard input}:6: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov' {standard input}:6: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov' {standard input}:1296: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov' {standard input}:1296: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov' <snip> On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 11:02:21AM -0500, David F Barrera wrote: > This problem has been corrected. Fix is in the latest BK source tree. > > On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 08:20 -0500, David F Barrera wrote: > > On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 17:08 -0300, Flavio Leitner wrote: > > > > > > Hello! > > > > > > I tried to compile xen 2.0.6 with gcc 4.0.0 and got lots of warnings > > > like: > > > > > > 'warning: pointer targets in passing argument X of 'function' differ in > > > signedness' > > > > > I am seeing the same thing on xen-unstable (xen devel 3.0) and GCC 4.0.0 > > on a FC4 platform. > > I submitted a defect on the Xensource Bugzilla, "Bugzilla Bug 73 > > gcc4 build break ...", to track this issue. > > > > > Is there any intention of compile xen stable/unstable with gcc 4.0.0? > > > > > > Thanks! > -- > Regards, > > David F Barrera > Linux Technology Center > Systems and Technology Group, IBM > > "The wisest men follow their own direction. " > Euripides > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users -- Flávio Bruno Leitner <fbl@conectiva.com.br> [0EA2 7F40 4CF4 1E63 4AF6 33C0 3E10 E205 F251 EDDA] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [Xen-devel] Re: gcc 4.0.0 and xen-devel 2005-06-09 13:13 ` Flavio Leitner @ 2005-06-09 13:55 ` Flavio Leitner 2005-06-09 16:54 ` Re: [Xen-users] " Vincent Hanquez 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Flavio Leitner @ 2005-06-09 13:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David F Barrera; +Cc: xen-devel, xen-users More info below where is failing. On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 10:13:37AM -0300, Flavio Leitner wrote: > > I checkout bktree from bk://xen.bkbits.net/xeno-unstable.bk > and now I'm getting these messages: > > make world or make dist > > <snip> > gcc -nostdinc -fno-builtin -fno-common -fno-strict-aliasing -iwithprefix > include -Wall -Werror -Wno-pointer-arith -pipe > -I/home/fbl/xeno-unstable.bk/xen/include > -I/home/fbl/xeno-unstable.bk/xen/include/asm-x86/mach-generic > -I/home/fbl/xeno-unstable.bk/xen/include/asm-x86/mach-default -O3 > -fomit-frame-pointer -msoft-float -m32 -march=i686 -DNDEBUG -c i8259.c > -o i8259.o > {standard input}: Assembler messages: > {standard input}:6: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov' > {standard input}:6: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov' > {standard input}:6: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov' > {standard input}:6: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov' > {standard input}:1296: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov' > {standard input}:1296: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov' > <snip> Gcc 4.0.0 Binutils 2.16.90.0.2 The assembler output: .file "i8259.c" #APP .align 16,0x90 common_interrupt: cld;pushl %eax;pushl %ebp;pushl %edi;pushl %esi;pushl %edx;pushl %ecx;pushl %ebx;testl $0x00020000,40(%esp);jz 2f;call setup_vm86_frame;jmp 3f;2:testb $3,36(%esp);jz 1f;movl %ds,56(%esp);movl %es,52(%esp);movl %fs,60(%esp);movl %gs,64(%esp);3:movl $(0xe010),%eax;movl %eax,%ds;movl %eax,%es;1:movl %esp,%eax pushl %eax call do_IRQ addl $4,%esp jmp ret_from_intr <snip> spurious_interrupt: pushl $0xff<<16 cld;pushl %eax;pushl %ebp;pushl %edi;pushl %esi;pushl %edx;pushl %ecx;pushl %ebx;testl $0x00020000,40(%esp);jz 2f;call setup_vm86_frame;jmp 3f;2:testb $3,36(%esp);jz 1f;movl %ds,56(%esp);movl %es,52(%esp);movl %fs,60(%esp);movl %gs,64(%esp);3:movl $(0xe010),%eax;movl %eax,%ds;movl %eax,%es;1:call smp_spurious_interrupt jmp ret_from_intr #NO_APP -- Flávio Bruno Leitner <fbl@conectiva.com.br> [0EA2 7F40 4CF4 1E63 4AF6 33C0 3E10 E205 F251 EDDA] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Re: [Xen-users] gcc 4.0.0 and xen-devel 2005-06-09 13:55 ` [Xen-devel] " Flavio Leitner @ 2005-06-09 16:54 ` Vincent Hanquez 2005-06-09 17:45 ` [Xen-devel] " Flavio Leitner 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Vincent Hanquez @ 2005-06-09 16:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Flavio Leitner; +Cc: David F Barrera, xen-devel, xen-users On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 10:55:07AM -0300, Flavio Leitner wrote: > > More info below where is failing. > > On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 10:13:37AM -0300, Flavio Leitner wrote: > > > > I checkout bktree from bk://xen.bkbits.net/xeno-unstable.bk > > and now I'm getting these messages: > > > > make world or make dist > > > > <snip> > > gcc -nostdinc -fno-builtin -fno-common -fno-strict-aliasing -iwithprefix > > include -Wall -Werror -Wno-pointer-arith -pipe > > -I/home/fbl/xeno-unstable.bk/xen/include > > -I/home/fbl/xeno-unstable.bk/xen/include/asm-x86/mach-generic > > -I/home/fbl/xeno-unstable.bk/xen/include/asm-x86/mach-default -O3 > > -fomit-frame-pointer -msoft-float -m32 -march=i686 -DNDEBUG -c i8259.c > > -o i8259.o > > {standard input}: Assembler messages: > > {standard input}:6: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov' > > {standard input}:6: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov' > > {standard input}:6: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov' > > {standard input}:6: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov' > > {standard input}:1296: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov' > > {standard input}:1296: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov' > > <snip> > > Gcc 4.0.0 > Binutils 2.16.90.0.2 these binutils version are unstable CVS (not a good idea to have that IMHO) and as far as I remember they remove support for "movl %ds, ...". now is must use: "mov %ds, ..." does the following patch fix your problems ? diff -Nru a/xen/include/asm-x86/x86_32/asm_defns.h b/xen/include/asm-x86/x86_32/asm_defns.h --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/x86_32/asm_defns.h 2005-06-09 17:52:47 +01:00 +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/x86_32/asm_defns.h 2005-06-09 17:52:47 +01:00 @@ -19,10 +19,10 @@ "jmp 3f;" \ "2:testb $3,"STR(UREGS_cs)"(%esp);" \ "jz 1f;" \ - "movl %ds,"STR(UREGS_ds)"(%esp);" \ - "movl %es,"STR(UREGS_es)"(%esp);" \ - "movl %fs,"STR(UREGS_fs)"(%esp);" \ - "movl %gs,"STR(UREGS_gs)"(%esp);" \ + "mov %ds,"STR(UREGS_ds)"(%esp);" \ + "mov %es,"STR(UREGS_es)"(%esp);" \ + "mov %fs,"STR(UREGS_fs)"(%esp);" \ + "mov %gs,"STR(UREGS_gs)"(%esp);" \ "3:" #define SAVE_ALL_NOSEGREGS(_reg) \ -- Vincent Hanquez ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [Xen-devel] Re: gcc 4.0.0 and xen-devel 2005-06-09 16:54 ` Re: [Xen-users] " Vincent Hanquez @ 2005-06-09 17:45 ` Flavio Leitner 2005-06-10 11:43 ` Re: [Xen-users] " Vincent Hanquez 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Flavio Leitner @ 2005-06-09 17:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Vincent Hanquez; +Cc: David F Barrera, xen-devel, xen-users > and as far as I remember they remove support for "movl %ds, ...". > now is must use: "mov %ds, ..." Yes, I found this on google. http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/devel/binutils/release.binutils-2.16.90.0.2 > does the following patch fix your problems ? Part of it because there are more places. Thanks! Well, now it breaks because of warnings. ===== xen/arch/x86/x86_32/entry.S 1.112 vs edited ===== --- 1.112/xen/arch/x86/x86_32/entry.S 2005-06-02 17:05:31 -04:00 +++ edited/xen/arch/x86/x86_32/entry.S 2005-06-09 10:32:50 -04:00 @@ -176,10 +176,10 @@ restore_all_guest: testl $X86_EFLAGS_VM,UREGS_eflags(%esp) jnz restore_all_vm86 -FLT1: movl UREGS_ds(%esp),%ds -FLT2: movl UREGS_es(%esp),%es -FLT3: movl UREGS_fs(%esp),%fs -FLT4: movl UREGS_gs(%esp),%gs +FLT1: mov UREGS_ds(%esp),%ds +FLT2: mov UREGS_es(%esp),%es +FLT3: mov UREGS_fs(%esp),%fs +FLT4: mov UREGS_gs(%esp),%gs restore_all_vm86: popl %ebx popl %ecx @@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ testl $(2|X86_EFLAGS_VM),%ecx jz ring1 /* jump if returning to an existing ring-1 activation */ movl VCPU_kernel_sp(%ebx),%esi -FLT6: movl VCPU_kernel_ss(%ebx),%gs +FLT6: mov VCPU_kernel_ss(%ebx),%gs testl $X86_EFLAGS_VM,UREGS_eflags+4(%esp) jz nvm86_1 subl $16,%esi /* push ES/DS/FS/GS (VM86 stack frame) */ @@ -326,7 +326,7 @@ jmp 1f ring1: /* obtain ss/esp from oldss/oldesp -- a ring-1 activation exists */ movl UREGS_esp+4(%esp),%esi -FLT13: movl UREGS_ss+4(%esp),%gs +FLT13: mov UREGS_ss+4(%esp),%gs 1: /* Construct a stack frame: EFLAGS, CS/EIP */ movb TRAPBOUNCE_flags(%edx),%cl subl $12,%esi @@ -383,7 +383,7 @@ nvm86_3:/* Rewrite our stack frame and return to ring 1. */ /* IA32 Ref. Vol. 3: TF, VM, RF and NT flags are cleared on trap. */ andl $0xfffcbeff,UREGS_eflags+4(%esp) - movl %gs,UREGS_ss+4(%esp) + mov %gs,UREGS_ss+4(%esp) movl %esi,UREGS_esp+4(%esp) movzwl TRAPBOUNCE_cs(%edx),%eax movl %eax,UREGS_cs+4(%esp) @@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ # GS:ESI == Ring-1 stack activation movl UREGS_esp(%esp),%esi -VFLT1: movl UREGS_ss(%esp),%gs +VFLT1: mov UREGS_ss(%esp),%gs # ES:EDI == Ring-0 stack activation leal UREGS_eip(%esp),%edi ===== xen/include/asm-x86/x86_32/asm_defns.h 1.10 vs edited ===== --- 1.10/xen/include/asm-x86/x86_32/asm_defns.h 2005-04-28 17:35:48 -04:00 +++ edited/xen/include/asm-x86/x86_32/asm_defns.h 2005-06-09 10:30:45 -04:00 @@ -19,10 +19,10 @@ "jmp 3f;" \ "2:testb $3,"STR(UREGS_cs)"(%esp);" \ "jz 1f;" \ - "movl %ds,"STR(UREGS_ds)"(%esp);" \ - "movl %es,"STR(UREGS_es)"(%esp);" \ - "movl %fs,"STR(UREGS_fs)"(%esp);" \ - "movl %gs,"STR(UREGS_gs)"(%esp);" \ + "mov %ds,"STR(UREGS_ds)"(%esp);" \ + "mov %es,"STR(UREGS_es)"(%esp);" \ + "mov %fs,"STR(UREGS_fs)"(%esp);" \ + "mov %gs,"STR(UREGS_gs)"(%esp);" \ "3:" #define SAVE_ALL_NOSEGREGS(_reg) \ @@ -31,8 +31,8 @@ #define SET_XEN_SEGMENTS(_reg) \ "movl $("STR(__HYPERVISOR_DS)"),%e"STR(_reg)"x;" \ - "movl %e"STR(_reg)"x,%ds;" \ - "movl %e"STR(_reg)"x,%es;" + "mov %e"STR(_reg)"x,%ds;" \ + "mov %e"STR(_reg)"x,%es;" #define SAVE_ALL(_reg) \ __SAVE_ALL_PRE \ @@ -56,10 +56,10 @@ jmp 3f; \ 2:testb $3,UREGS_cs(%esp); \ jz 1f; \ - movl %ds,UREGS_ds(%esp); \ - movl %es,UREGS_es(%esp); \ - movl %fs,UREGS_fs(%esp); \ - movl %gs,UREGS_gs(%esp); \ + mov %ds,UREGS_ds(%esp); \ + mov %es,UREGS_es(%esp); \ + mov %fs,UREGS_fs(%esp); \ + mov %gs,UREGS_gs(%esp); \ 3: #define SAVE_ALL_NOSEGREGS(_reg) \ @@ -68,8 +68,8 @@ #define SET_XEN_SEGMENTS(_reg) \ movl $(__HYPERVISOR_DS),%e ## _reg ## x; \ - movl %e ## _reg ## x,%ds; \ - movl %e ## _reg ## x,%es; + mov %e ## _reg ## x,%ds; \ + mov %e ## _reg ## x,%es; #define SAVE_ALL(_reg) \ __SAVE_ALL_PRE \ -- Flávio Bruno Leitner <fbl@conectiva.com.br> [0EA2 7F40 4CF4 1E63 4AF6 33C0 3E10 E205 F251 EDDA] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Re: [Xen-users] gcc 4.0.0 and xen-devel 2005-06-09 17:45 ` [Xen-devel] " Flavio Leitner @ 2005-06-10 11:43 ` Vincent Hanquez 2005-06-10 13:02 ` David F Barrera 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Vincent Hanquez @ 2005-06-10 11:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Flavio Leitner; +Cc: David F Barrera, xen-devel, Vincent Hanquez, xen-users On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 02:45:11PM -0300, Flavio Leitner wrote: > > does the following patch fix your problems ? > > Part of it because there are more places. Thanks! > > Well, now it breaks because of warnings. Applied thanks. please don't forget a Signed-off-by line next time. -- Vincent Hanquez ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Re: [Xen-users] gcc 4.0.0 and xen-devel 2005-06-10 11:43 ` Re: [Xen-users] " Vincent Hanquez @ 2005-06-10 13:02 ` David F Barrera 2005-06-10 13:46 ` Vincent Hanquez 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: David F Barrera @ 2005-06-10 13:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: xen-devel, xen-users I am getting gcc 4.0 errors on xen-unstable, x86_64: (The last changeset on the source that I am using was ChangeSet 2005/06/10 10:34:30+01:00 kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk) gcc -pthread -fno-strict-aliasing -DNDEBUG -O2 -Wall -g -pipe -Wp,- D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -m64 -D_GNU_SOURCE -fPIC -m64 -fPIC - I../../tools/python/xen/lowlevel/xu -I../../tools/libxc - I../../tools/xenstore -I../../tools/xcs -Ixen/lowlevel/xs - I/usr/include/python2.4 -c xen/lowlevel/xs/xs.c -o build/temp.linux- x86_64-2.4/xen/lowlevel/xs/xs.o -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -Werror cc1: warnings being treated as errors xen/lowlevel/xs/xs.c: In function ‘xspy_read’: xen/lowlevel/xs/xs.c:96: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 3 of ‘xs_read’ differ in signedness xen/lowlevel/xs/xs.c: In function ‘xspy_ls’: xen/lowlevel/xs/xs.c:144: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 3 of ‘xs_directory’ differ in signedness xen/lowlevel/xs/xs.c: In function ‘xspy_get_permissions’: xen/lowlevel/xs/xs.c:193: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 3 of ‘xs_get_permissions’ differ in signedness error: command 'gcc' failed with exit status 1 make[3]: *** [build] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/xen-unstable/tools/python' make[2]: *** [install] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/xen-unstable/tools' make[1]: *** [tools] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/xen-unstable' make: *** [world] Error 2 On Fri, 2005-06-10 at 13:43 +0200, Vincent Hanquez wrote: > On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 02:45:11PM -0300, Flavio Leitner wrote: > > > > does the following patch fix your problems ? > > > > Part of it because there are more places. Thanks! > > > > Well, now it breaks because of warnings. > > Applied thanks. > please don't forget a Signed-off-by line next time. > -- Regards, David F Barrera Linux Technology Center Systems and Technology Group, IBM "The wisest men follow their own direction. " Euripides ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Re: [Xen-users] gcc 4.0.0 and xen-devel 2005-06-10 13:02 ` David F Barrera @ 2005-06-10 13:46 ` Vincent Hanquez 0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Vincent Hanquez @ 2005-06-10 13:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David F Barrera; +Cc: xen-devel, xen-users On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 08:02:20AM -0500, David F Barrera wrote: > I am getting gcc 4.0 errors on xen-unstable, x86_64: > > (The last changeset on the source that I am using was > ChangeSet 2005/06/10 10:34:30+01:00 kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk) thoses warning has been corrected already. try to pull a new version. -- Vincent Hanquez ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-06-10 13:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20050607200837.GH3554@conectiva.com.br>
2005-06-08 13:20 ` gcc 4.0.0 and xen-devel David F Barrera
2005-06-08 16:02 ` [Xen-users] " David F Barrera
2005-06-09 13:13 ` Flavio Leitner
2005-06-09 13:55 ` [Xen-devel] " Flavio Leitner
2005-06-09 16:54 ` Re: [Xen-users] " Vincent Hanquez
2005-06-09 17:45 ` [Xen-devel] " Flavio Leitner
2005-06-10 11:43 ` Re: [Xen-users] " Vincent Hanquez
2005-06-10 13:02 ` David F Barrera
2005-06-10 13:46 ` Vincent Hanquez
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.