hard hang with reiser4-for-2.6.11-5 and VMware Workstation 5.0

hard hang with reiser4-for-2.6.11-5 and VMware Workstation 5.0

[scott]

Greetings,

I have been using Reiser4 as my primary filesystem for
some time now, and for the first time have encountered
a problem that keeps me from doing what I want to do.

I run VMware Workstation 5.0 with the virtual disk
files on my Reiser4 / partition, which happens to be a
Linux md RAID1 device.  The other day I built a new
kernel, upgrading to the -5 release of the reiser4
patches.  Either during boot or shortly after boot of
any guest OS, my workstation becomes totally
unresponsive.  Magic SysRq keys don't even work.

To narrow down the source of the problem, I applied
the Reiser4 patch to a vanilla 2.6.11 kernel tree.  I
saw the exact same issue.

I tried reverting to a previous version of the Reiser4
patch, but I get VFS errors about being unable to find
a Reiser4 filesystem on my rootdisk using any other
Reiser4 patchset.  Did the filesystem format change?

I tried recompiling the -5 release with debug enabled,
but since the machine is unresponsive, I don't see any
output.

My question...  is this a known issue?  Or should I
just keep pounding away at this until I can get some
sort of debugging information?

Thanks to you all for the always-interesting
discussion threads on this list.  And thanks, Hans,
for reiserfs and reiser4.

be seeing you.

scott


		
____________________________________________________ 
Yahoo! Sports 
Rekindle the Rivalries. Sign up for Fantasy Football 
http://football.fantasysports.yahoo.com

Re: hard hang with reiser4-for-2.6.11-5 and VMware Workstation 5.0

[E.Gryaznova]

Hello.

Thank you for the report.

VMWare/reiser4 is known problem, we can reproduce it.  But unfortunately 
I can't  estimate when this will be fixed.
Reiser4 format was changed in reiser4-5 patch for 2.6.11, reiser4progs 
for this format are not ready yet.

Thanks,
Lena

scott wrote:

>Greetings,
>
>I have been using Reiser4 as my primary filesystem for
>some time now, and for the first time have encountered
>a problem that keeps me from doing what I want to do.
>
>I run VMware Workstation 5.0 with the virtual disk
>files on my Reiser4 / partition, which happens to be a
>Linux md RAID1 device.  The other day I built a new
>kernel, upgrading to the -5 release of the reiser4
>patches.  Either during boot or shortly after boot of
>any guest OS, my workstation becomes totally
>unresponsive.  Magic SysRq keys don't even work.
>  
>

>To narrow down the source of the problem, I applied
>the Reiser4 patch to a vanilla 2.6.11 kernel tree.  I
>saw the exact same issue.
>
>I tried reverting to a previous version of the Reiser4
>patch, but I get VFS errors about being unable to find
>a Reiser4 filesystem on my rootdisk using any other
>Reiser4 patchset.  Did the filesystem format change?
>  
>

>I tried recompiling the -5 release with debug enabled,
>but since the machine is unresponsive, I don't see any
>output.
>
>My question...  is this a known issue?  Or should I
>just keep pounding away at this until I can get some
>sort of debugging information?
>
>Thanks to you all for the always-interesting
>discussion threads on this list.  And thanks, Hans,
>for reiserfs and reiser4.
>
>be seeing you.
>
>scott
>
>
>		
>____________________________________________________ 
>Yahoo! Sports 
>Rekindle the Rivalries. Sign up for Fantasy Football 
>http://football.fantasysports.yahoo.com
>
>
>  
>

Re: hard hang with reiser4-for-2.6.11-5 and VMware Workstation 5.0

[Wil Reichert]

I've been running VMWare 5 on my reiser4 partition for a while now and
haven't had any of the above issues.  Usually doing CPU intensive
stuff too, aka WebSphere Portal servers.  I use an -mm kernel, if that
matters.

Wil

On 6/17/05, E.Gryaznova <grev@namesys.com> wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> Thank you for the report.
> 
> VMWare/reiser4 is known problem, we can reproduce it.  But unfortunately
> I can't  estimate when this will be fixed.
> Reiser4 format was changed in reiser4-5 patch for 2.6.11, reiser4progs
> for this format are not ready yet.
> 
> Thanks,
> Lena
> 
> scott wrote:
> 
> >Greetings,
> >
> >I have been using Reiser4 as my primary filesystem for
> >some time now, and for the first time have encountered
> >a problem that keeps me from doing what I want to do.
> >
> >I run VMware Workstation 5.0 with the virtual disk
> >files on my Reiser4 / partition, which happens to be a
> >Linux md RAID1 device.  The other day I built a new
> >kernel, upgrading to the -5 release of the reiser4
> >patches.  Either during boot or shortly after boot of
> >any guest OS, my workstation becomes totally
> >unresponsive.  Magic SysRq keys don't even work.
> >
> >
> 
> >To narrow down the source of the problem, I applied
> >the Reiser4 patch to a vanilla 2.6.11 kernel tree.  I
> >saw the exact same issue.
> >
> >I tried reverting to a previous version of the Reiser4
> >patch, but I get VFS errors about being unable to find
> >a Reiser4 filesystem on my rootdisk using any other
> >Reiser4 patchset.  Did the filesystem format change?
> >
> >
> 
> >I tried recompiling the -5 release with debug enabled,
> >but since the machine is unresponsive, I don't see any
> >output.
> >
> >My question...  is this a known issue?  Or should I
> >just keep pounding away at this until I can get some
> >sort of debugging information?
> >
> >Thanks to you all for the always-interesting
> >discussion threads on this list.  And thanks, Hans,
> >for reiserfs and reiser4.
> >
> >be seeing you.
> >
> >scott
> >
> >
> >
> >____________________________________________________
> >Yahoo! Sports
> >Rekindle the Rivalries. Sign up for Fantasy Football
> >http://football.fantasysports.yahoo.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
>

Re: hard hang with reiser4-for-2.6.11-5 and VMware Workstation 5.0

[scott]

I had absolutely no troubles between VMware and
Reiser4 until I upgraded to the -5 patchset. 

Do you know which Reiser4 patchset is included in your
-mm kernel?  If it is earlier than the -5 release, you
might want to avoid the -5 release when it gets rolled
into -mm since it doesn't seem like you can go back to
a previous release.

--- Wil Reichert <wil.reichert@gmail.com> wrote:

> I've been running VMWare 5 on my reiser4 partition
> for a while now and
> haven't had any of the above issues.  Usually doing
> CPU intensive
> stuff too, aka WebSphere Portal servers.  I use an
> -mm kernel, if that
> matters.
> 
> Wil
> 
> On 6/17/05, E.Gryaznova <grev@namesys.com> wrote:
> > Hello.
> > 
> > Thank you for the report.
> > 
> > VMWare/reiser4 is known problem, we can reproduce
> it.  But unfortunately
> > I can't  estimate when this will be fixed.
> > Reiser4 format was changed in reiser4-5 patch for
> 2.6.11, reiser4progs
> > for this format are not ready yet.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Lena
> > 
> > scott wrote:
> > 
> > >Greetings,
> > >
> > >I have been using Reiser4 as my primary
> filesystem for
> > >some time now, and for the first time have
> encountered
> > >a problem that keeps me from doing what I want to
> do.
> > >
> > >I run VMware Workstation 5.0 with the virtual
> disk
> > >files on my Reiser4 / partition, which happens to
> be a
> > >Linux md RAID1 device.  The other day I built a
> new
> > >kernel, upgrading to the -5 release of the
> reiser4
> > >patches.  Either during boot or shortly after
> boot of
> > >any guest OS, my workstation becomes totally
> > >unresponsive.  Magic SysRq keys don't even work.
> > >
> > >
> > 
> > >To narrow down the source of the problem, I
> applied
> > >the Reiser4 patch to a vanilla 2.6.11 kernel
> tree.  I
> > >saw the exact same issue.
> > >
> > >I tried reverting to a previous version of the
> Reiser4
> > >patch, but I get VFS errors about being unable to
> find
> > >a Reiser4 filesystem on my rootdisk using any
> other
> > >Reiser4 patchset.  Did the filesystem format
> change?
> > >
> > >
> > 
> > >I tried recompiling the -5 release with debug
> enabled,
> > >but since the machine is unresponsive, I don't
> see any
> > >output.
> > >
> > >My question...  is this a known issue?  Or should
> I
> > >just keep pounding away at this until I can get
> some
> > >sort of debugging information?
> > >
> > >Thanks to you all for the always-interesting
> > >discussion threads on this list.  And thanks,
> Hans,
> > >for reiserfs and reiser4.
> > >
> > >be seeing you.
> > >
> > >scott
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>____________________________________________________
> > >Yahoo! Sports
> > >Rekindle the Rivalries. Sign up for Fantasy
> Football
> > >http://football.fantasysports.yahoo.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > 
> > 
> >
> 


be seeing you.

scott

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Re: hard hang with reiser4-for-2.6.11-5 and VMware Workstation 5.0

[Wil Reichert]

Currently running rc4-mm1 on Gentoo, unsure of how to tell which
patchset its using, kernel.org broken out patchsets didn't make it
obvious.  Thanks for the advice, I rely heavily on VMWare.

Wil

On 6/17/05, scott <scottfk@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I had absolutely no troubles between VMware and
> Reiser4 until I upgraded to the -5 patchset.
> 
> Do you know which Reiser4 patchset is included in your
> -mm kernel?  If it is earlier than the -5 release, you
> might want to avoid the -5 release when it gets rolled
> into -mm since it doesn't seem like you can go back to
> a previous release.
> 
> --- Wil Reichert <wil.reichert@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > I've been running VMWare 5 on my reiser4 partition
> > for a while now and
> > haven't had any of the above issues.  Usually doing
> > CPU intensive
> > stuff too, aka WebSphere Portal servers.  I use an
> > -mm kernel, if that
> > matters.
> >
> > Wil
> >
> > On 6/17/05, E.Gryaznova <grev@namesys.com> wrote:
> > > Hello.
> > >
> > > Thank you for the report.
> > >
> > > VMWare/reiser4 is known problem, we can reproduce
> > it.  But unfortunately
> > > I can't  estimate when this will be fixed.
> > > Reiser4 format was changed in reiser4-5 patch for
> > 2.6.11, reiser4progs
> > > for this format are not ready yet.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Lena
> > >
> > > scott wrote:
> > >
> > > >Greetings,
> > > >
> > > >I have been using Reiser4 as my primary
> > filesystem for
> > > >some time now, and for the first time have
> > encountered
> > > >a problem that keeps me from doing what I want to
> > do.
> > > >
> > > >I run VMware Workstation 5.0 with the virtual
> > disk
> > > >files on my Reiser4 / partition, which happens to
> > be a
> > > >Linux md RAID1 device.  The other day I built a
> > new
> > > >kernel, upgrading to the -5 release of the
> > reiser4
> > > >patches.  Either during boot or shortly after
> > boot of
> > > >any guest OS, my workstation becomes totally
> > > >unresponsive.  Magic SysRq keys don't even work.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > >To narrow down the source of the problem, I
> > applied
> > > >the Reiser4 patch to a vanilla 2.6.11 kernel
> > tree.  I
> > > >saw the exact same issue.
> > > >
> > > >I tried reverting to a previous version of the
> > Reiser4
> > > >patch, but I get VFS errors about being unable to
> > find
> > > >a Reiser4 filesystem on my rootdisk using any
> > other
> > > >Reiser4 patchset.  Did the filesystem format
> > change?
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > >I tried recompiling the -5 release with debug
> > enabled,
> > > >but since the machine is unresponsive, I don't
> > see any
> > > >output.
> > > >
> > > >My question...  is this a known issue?  Or should
> > I
> > > >just keep pounding away at this until I can get
> > some
> > > >sort of debugging information?
> > > >
> > > >Thanks to you all for the always-interesting
> > > >discussion threads on this list.  And thanks,
> > Hans,
> > > >for reiserfs and reiser4.
> > > >
> > > >be seeing you.
> > > >
> > > >scott
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >____________________________________________________
> > > >Yahoo! Sports
> > > >Rekindle the Rivalries. Sign up for Fantasy
> > Football
> > > >http://football.fantasysports.yahoo.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> 
> 
> be seeing you.
> 
> scott
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>

Re: hard hang with reiser4-for-2.6.11-5 and VMware Workstation 5.0

[scott]

akpm released that kernel on 12 May, well before the
-5 Reiser4 patchset was released.

Looking over the release announcements for the -mm
kernel, it doesn't seem that akpm has merged the -5
patchset into his kernel yet.

--- Wil Reichert <wil.reichert@gmail.com> wrote:

> Currently running rc4-mm1 on Gentoo, unsure of how
> to tell which
> patchset its using, kernel.org broken out patchsets
> didn't make it
> obvious.  Thanks for the advice, I rely heavily on
> VMWare.
> 
> Wil
> 
> On 6/17/05, scott <scottfk@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > I had absolutely no troubles between VMware and
> > Reiser4 until I upgraded to the -5 patchset.
> > 
> > Do you know which Reiser4 patchset is included in
> your
> > -mm kernel?  If it is earlier than the -5 release,
> you
> > might want to avoid the -5 release when it gets
> rolled
> > into -mm since it doesn't seem like you can go
> back to
> > a previous release.
> > 
> > --- Wil Reichert <wil.reichert@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > I've been running VMWare 5 on my reiser4
> partition
> > > for a while now and
> > > haven't had any of the above issues.  Usually
> doing
> > > CPU intensive
> > > stuff too, aka WebSphere Portal servers.  I use
> an
> > > -mm kernel, if that
> > > matters.
> > >
> > > Wil
> > >
> > > On 6/17/05, E.Gryaznova <grev@namesys.com>
> wrote:
> > > > Hello.
> > > >
> > > > Thank you for the report.
> > > >
> > > > VMWare/reiser4 is known problem, we can
> reproduce
> > > it.  But unfortunately
> > > > I can't  estimate when this will be fixed.
> > > > Reiser4 format was changed in reiser4-5 patch
> for
> > > 2.6.11, reiser4progs
> > > > for this format are not ready yet.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Lena
> > > >
> > > > scott wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >Greetings,
> > > > >
> > > > >I have been using Reiser4 as my primary
> > > filesystem for
> > > > >some time now, and for the first time have
> > > encountered
> > > > >a problem that keeps me from doing what I
> want to
> > > do.
> > > > >
> > > > >I run VMware Workstation 5.0 with the virtual
> > > disk
> > > > >files on my Reiser4 / partition, which
> happens to
> > > be a
> > > > >Linux md RAID1 device.  The other day I built
> a
> > > new
> > > > >kernel, upgrading to the -5 release of the
> > > reiser4
> > > > >patches.  Either during boot or shortly after
> > > boot of
> > > > >any guest OS, my workstation becomes totally
> > > > >unresponsive.  Magic SysRq keys don't even
> work.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > >To narrow down the source of the problem, I
> > > applied
> > > > >the Reiser4 patch to a vanilla 2.6.11 kernel
> > > tree.  I
> > > > >saw the exact same issue.
> > > > >
> > > > >I tried reverting to a previous version of
> the
> > > Reiser4
> > > > >patch, but I get VFS errors about being
> unable to
> > > find
> > > > >a Reiser4 filesystem on my rootdisk using any
> > > other
> > > > >Reiser4 patchset.  Did the filesystem format
> > > change?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > >I tried recompiling the -5 release with debug
> > > enabled,
> > > > >but since the machine is unresponsive, I
> don't
> > > see any
> > > > >output.
> > > > >
> > > > >My question...  is this a known issue?  Or
> should
> > > I
> > > > >just keep pounding away at this until I can
> get
> > > some
> > > > >sort of debugging information?
> > > > >
> > > > >Thanks to you all for the always-interesting
> > > > >discussion threads on this list.  And thanks,
> > > Hans,
> > > > >for reiserfs and reiser4.
> > > > >
> > > > >be seeing you.
> > > > >
> > > > >scott
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>____________________________________________________
> > > > >Yahoo! Sports
> > > > >Rekindle the Rivalries. Sign up for Fantasy
> > > Football
> > > > >http://football.fantasysports.yahoo.com
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > be seeing you.
> > 
> > scott
> > 
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> 


be seeing you.

scott

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Re: hard hang with reiser4-for-2.6.11-5 and VMware Workstation 5.0

[Hans Reiser]

E.Gryaznova wrote:

> Hello.
>
> Thank you for the report.
>
> VMWare/reiser4 is known problem, we can reproduce it.  But
> unfortunately I can't  estimate when this will be fixed.
> Reiser4 format was changed in reiser4-5 patch for 2.6.11, reiser4progs
> for this format are not ready yet.
>
> Thanks,
> Lena
>
> scott wrote:
>
>> Greetings,
>>
>> I have been using Reiser4 as my primary filesystem for
>> some time now, and for the first time have encountered
>> a problem that keeps me from doing what I want to do.
>>
>> I run VMware Workstation 5.0 with the virtual disk
>> files on my Reiser4 / partition, which happens to be a
>> Linux md RAID1 device.  The other day I built a new
>> kernel, upgrading to the -5 release of the reiser4
>> patches.  Either during boot or shortly after boot of
>> any guest OS, my workstation becomes totally
>> unresponsive.  Magic SysRq keys don't even work.
>>  
>>
>
>> To narrow down the source of the problem, I applied
>> the Reiser4 patch to a vanilla 2.6.11 kernel tree.  I
>> saw the exact same issue.
>>
>> I tried reverting to a previous version of the Reiser4
>> patch, but I get VFS errors about being unable to find
>> a Reiser4 filesystem on my rootdisk using any other
>> Reiser4 patchset.  Did the filesystem format change?
>>  
>>
>
>> I tried recompiling the -5 release with debug enabled,
>> but since the machine is unresponsive, I don't see any
>> output.
>>
>> My question...  is this a known issue?  Or should I
>> just keep pounding away at this until I can get some
>> sort of debugging information?
>>
>> Thanks to you all for the always-interesting
>> discussion threads on this list.  And thanks, Hans,
>> for reiserfs and reiser4.
>>
>> be seeing you.
>>
>> scott
>>
>>
>>        
>> ____________________________________________________ Yahoo! Sports
>> Rekindle the Rivalries. Sign up for Fantasy Football
>> http://football.fantasysports.yahoo.com
>>
>>
>>  
>>
>
>
>
>
Vitaly, what is the eta on updating reiser4progs?

Re: hard hang with reiser4-for-2.6.11-5 and VMware Workstation 5.0

[mjt]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 335 bytes --]

On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 09:30:40PM +0400, E.Gryaznova wrote:

>Reiser4 format was changed in reiser4-5 patch for 2.6.11, reiser4progs 
>for this format are not ready yet.

So, erhm, can we expect a smooth transition here?

Update the tools, do something light and off we go or will we
need to mkfs?

Spatsibo!

-- 
mjt


[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: hard hang with reiser4-for-2.6.11-5 and VMware Workstation 5.0

[Vitaly Fertman]

On Saturday 18 June 2005 14:29, Markus Törnqvist wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 09:30:40PM +0400, E.Gryaznova wrote:
> 
> >Reiser4 format was changed in reiser4-5 patch for 2.6.11, reiser4progs 
> >for this format are not ready yet.
> 
> So, erhm, can we expect a smooth transition here?

yes, the patch is being tested.

> Update the tools, do something light and off we go or will we
> need to mkfs?
> 
> Spatsibo!
> 

-- 
Thanks,
Vitaly Fertman

Re: hard hang with reiser4-for-2.6.11-5 and VMware Workstation 5.0

[mjt]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 193 bytes --]

On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 05:56:49PM +0400, Vitaly Fertman wrote:
>> So, erhm, can we expect a smooth transition here?
>yes, the patch is being tested.

fsck patch?

Thanks!

-- 
mjt


[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: hard hang with reiser4-for-2.6.11-5 and VMware Workstation 5.0

[Vladimir Saveliev]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 280 bytes --]

Hello

On Sat, 2005-06-18 at 18:36, Markus TЖrnqvist wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 05:56:49PM +0400, Vitaly Fertman wrote:
> >> So, erhm, can we expect a smooth transition here?
> >yes, the patch is being tested.
> 
> fsck patch?
> 
yes, here is it against reiser4progs-1.0.4.

[-- Attachment #2: reiser4progs.pset.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2675 bytes --]

===== include/reiser4/plugin.h 1.739 vs edited =====
--- 1.739/include/reiser4/plugin.h	2005-01-30 15:57:02 +03:00
+++ edited/include/reiser4/plugin.h	2005-06-18 16:53:14 +04:00
@@ -285,20 +285,23 @@ enum reiser4_opset_id {
 	OPSET_DIRITEM		= 0x7,
 	OPSET_CRYPTO		= 0x8,
 	OPSET_DIGEST		= 0x9,
-	OPSET_COMPRES		= 0xa,
+	OPSET_CPRESS		= 0xa,
+	OPSET_CPRESS_MODE	= 0xb,
+	OPSET_CLUSTER		= 0xc,
+	OPSET_REGULAR		= 0xd,
 	
-	OPSET_STORE_LAST        = (OPSET_COMPRES + 1),
+	OPSET_STORE_LAST,
 	
 	/* These are not stored on disk in the current implementation. */
-	OPSET_CREATE		= 0xb,
-	OPSET_MKDIR		= 0xc,
-	OPSET_SYMLINK		= 0xd,
-	OPSET_MKNODE		= 0xe,
+	OPSET_CREATE		= OPSET_STORE_LAST + 1,
+	OPSET_MKDIR		= OPSET_STORE_LAST + 2,
+	OPSET_SYMLINK		= OPSET_STORE_LAST + 3,
+	OPSET_MKNODE		= OPSET_STORE_LAST + 4,
 	
 #ifndef ENABLE_MINIMAL
-	OPSET_TAIL		= 0xf,
-	OPSET_EXTENT		= 0x10,
-	OPSET_ACL		= 0x11,
+	OPSET_TAIL		= OPSET_STORE_LAST + 5,
+	OPSET_EXTENT		= OPSET_STORE_LAST + 6,
+	OPSET_ACL		= OPSET_STORE_LAST + 7,
 #endif
 	OPSET_LAST
 };
===== libreiser4/pset.c 1.19 vs edited =====
--- 1.19/libreiser4/pset.c	2004-11-24 12:09:22 +03:00
+++ edited/libreiser4/pset.c	2005-06-18 17:00:27 +04:00
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ opset_member_t opset_prof[OPSET_LAST] = 
 		.ess = 1,
 #endif
 	},
-	[OPSET_COMPRES] = {
+	[OPSET_CPRESS] = {
 		.type = INVAL_TYPE,
 #ifndef ENABLE_MINIMAL
 		.group = INVAL_PID,
@@ -119,7 +119,31 @@ opset_member_t opset_prof[OPSET_LAST] = 
 		.ess = 1,
 #endif
 	},
-	
+	[OPSET_CPRESS_MODE] = {
+		.type = INVAL_TYPE,
+#ifndef ENABLE_MINIMAL
+		.group = INVAL_PID,
+		.prof = INVAL_PID,
+		.ess = 1,
+#endif
+	},
+	[OPSET_CLUSTER] = {
+		.type = INVAL_TYPE,
+#ifndef ENABLE_MINIMAL
+		.group = INVAL_PID,
+		.prof = INVAL_PID,
+		.ess = 1,
+#endif
+	},
+	[OPSET_REGULAR] = {
+		.type = INVAL_TYPE,
+#ifndef ENABLE_MINIMAL
+		.group = INVAL_PID,
+		.prof = INVAL_PID,
+		.ess = 1,
+#endif
+	},
+
 	/* Note, plugins below are not stored on-disk. */
 
 	/* The 4 plugins below needs to be splited -- for now they are used for
===== plugin/sdext/sdext_plug/sdext_plug_repair.c 1.10 vs edited =====
--- 1.10/plugin/sdext/sdext_plug/sdext_plug_repair.c	2004-09-22 18:21:08 +04:00
+++ edited/plugin/sdext/sdext_plug/sdext_plug_repair.c	2005-06-18 17:00:16 +04:00
@@ -22,7 +22,10 @@ char *opset_name[OPSET_STORE_LAST] = {
 	[OPSET_DIRITEM] = "diritem",
 	[OPSET_CRYPTO] =  "crypto",
 	[OPSET_DIGEST] =  "digest",
-	[OPSET_COMPRES] = "compress"
+	[OPSET_CPRESS] =  "compress",
+	[OPSET_CPRESS_MODE] = "compress mode",
+	[OPSET_CLUSTER] = "cluster",
+	[OPSET_REGULAR] =  "regular"
 };
 
 errno_t sdext_plug_check_struct(stat_entity_t *stat, repair_hint_t *hint) {

Re: hard hang with reiser4-for-2.6.11-5 and VMware Workstation 5.0

[mjt]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 446 bytes --]

On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 03:36:53PM +0400, Vladimir Saveliev wrote:

>> fsck patch?

>yes, here is it against reiser4progs-1.0.4.

Spatsibo!

I'm trying to merge Reiser4 onto 2.6.12, it seems the best one
to install is the replacement for -rc5-mm2 from your ftp and not
akpm's broken-out one?

Are there any caveats I should be aware of, except that what's mentioned
in the README about config dependancies?

Thanks!

-- 
mjt


[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: hard hang with reiser4-for-2.6.11-5 and VMware Workstation 5.0

[Francesco Biscani]

On Monday 20 June 2005 14:24, Markus Törnqvist wrote:
> I'm trying to merge Reiser4 onto 2.6.12, it seems the best one
> to install is the replacement for -rc5-mm2 from your ftp and not
> akpm's broken-out one?
>

2.6.12-mm1 has just come out, and the changelog says it has a new reiser4 code 
drop. I guess it features the recent updates?

Many thanks,

  Francesco

-- 
Dr. Francesco Biscani
Dipartimento di Astronomia
Università di Padova
biscani@pd.astro.it

Re: hard hang with reiser4-for-2.6.11-5 and VMware Workstation 5.0

[Vladimir Saveliev]

Hello

On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 16:24, Markus Törnqvist wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 03:36:53PM +0400, Vladimir Saveliev wrote:
> 
> >> fsck patch?
> 
> >yes, here is it against reiser4progs-1.0.4.
> 
> Spatsibo!
> 
> I'm trying to merge Reiser4 onto 2.6.12, it seems the best one
> to install is the replacement for -rc5-mm2 from your ftp and not
> akpm's broken-out one?
> 
replacement for 2.6.12-rc5-mm2 is the same as reiser4 in 2.6.12-mm1.

> Are there any caveats I should be aware of, except that what's mentioned
> in the README about config dependancies?
> 

in 2.6.12 you do not need the following reiser4 2.6.11 specificpatches
ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiser4-for-2.6/2.6.11/broken-out.1/reiser4-mapping_cap_account_dirty-fix.patch
and
ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiser4-for-2.6/2.6.11/broken-out.1/reiser4-mapping-tree-lock-fix.patch



So, in short, I think you should apply reiser4*patch of 2.6.12-mm1 to
2.6.12 and that is all. 

> Thanks!

Re: hard hang with reiser4-for-2.6.11-5 and VMware Workstation 5.0

[mjt]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 459 bytes --]

On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 08:18:35PM +0400, Vladimir Saveliev wrote:

>So, in short, I think you should apply reiser4*patch of 2.6.12-mm1 to
>2.6.12 and that is all. 

I did that, and the progs, and all's ok!

Quickly ran bonnie++ in the 32-bit chroot and it was ok, also
with 32-bit and 64-bit at the same time, in the same dir.

I dunno what else I can test for soon enough but at least I
didn't get oopses or anything :)

Thanks!

-- 
mjt


[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]