From: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
To: Roberto Nibali <ratz@tac.ch>
Cc: Netfilter Developers <netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>,
Pablo Neira <pablo@eurodev.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] update raw patch in POM
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 13:18:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050621111858.GL8335@postel.suug.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42B7B7D8.1050204@tac.ch>
* Roberto Nibali <42B7B7D8.1050204@tac.ch> 2005-06-21 08:46
> > Almost forgot: the nf_reset() patch should "fix" this bug. "Fix"
> > because it doesn't really fix it but rather hides this issue
> > for a later possible revival.
>
> I thought so, however is there a clean fix which does not involve rewriting the
> raw patch? I mean the unconditional nf_reset() is rather intrusive. What about
> other netfilter extensions, they could have the same refcnt problem, couldn't they?
I suggest to introduce a flag to mark undestroyable conntrack
entries just like we declared qdisc->handle == 0 to be default
qdiscs which may never be destroyed. A new status flag might
do it but I'm simply not familiar enough with the netfilter
code to propose any specific fixes.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-21 11:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-07 11:06 [PATCH] update raw patch in POM Roberto Nibali
2005-06-07 14:37 ` Roberto Nibali
2005-06-07 22:55 ` Pablo Neira
2005-06-08 8:23 ` Roberto Nibali
2005-06-08 12:37 ` Pablo Neira
2005-06-14 15:27 ` Roberto Nibali
2005-06-20 8:18 ` Roberto Nibali
2005-06-20 9:07 ` Roberto Nibali
2005-06-20 10:41 ` SOLVED (was: Re: [PATCH] update raw patch in POM) Roberto Nibali
2005-06-20 11:01 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2005-06-20 11:03 ` SOLVED Roberto Nibali
2005-06-20 11:04 ` SOLVED Jozsef Kadlecsik
2005-06-20 10:49 ` [PATCH] update raw patch in POM Jan Engelhardt
2005-06-20 11:03 ` Roberto Nibali
2005-06-21 0:34 ` Thomas Graf
2005-06-21 0:39 ` Thomas Graf
2005-06-21 6:46 ` Roberto Nibali
2005-06-21 8:59 ` Pablo Neira
2005-06-21 9:08 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2005-06-21 11:18 ` Thomas Graf [this message]
2005-06-21 0:51 ` Pablo Neira
2005-06-21 11:13 ` Thomas Graf
2005-06-21 14:00 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-21 14:17 ` [PATCH] update raw patch in POM [2.4.x] Roberto Nibali
2005-06-21 14:47 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-21 15:15 ` Roberto Nibali
2005-06-21 15:32 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-22 9:26 ` Roberto Nibali
2005-06-22 7:04 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2005-06-22 9:10 ` Roberto Nibali
2005-06-22 9:19 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2005-06-22 9:27 ` Roberto Nibali
2005-06-21 21:50 ` [PATCH] update raw patch in POM Thomas Graf
2005-06-22 0:32 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-22 0:52 ` Thomas Graf
2005-06-22 3:24 ` Pablo Neira
2005-06-22 3:55 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-22 5:48 ` Roberto Nibali
2005-06-22 11:39 ` Roberto Nibali
2005-06-22 18:38 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-27 6:36 ` Roberto Nibali
2005-06-27 10:57 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-27 12:07 ` Roberto Nibali
2005-06-27 12:55 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-27 13:53 ` Roberto Nibali
2005-06-27 15:49 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-28 6:02 ` Roberto Nibali
2005-06-27 8:50 ` Roberto Nibali
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050621111858.GL8335@postel.suug.ch \
--to=tgraf@suug.ch \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
--cc=pablo@eurodev.net \
--cc=ratz@tac.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.