All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roberto Nibali <ratz@tac.ch>
To: Pablo Neira <pablo@eurodev.net>
Cc: Netfilter Developers <netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] update raw patch in POM
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 10:23:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <42A6AB19.2040106@tac.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42A625DA.7090807@eurodev.net>

Hey Pablo,

> You've killed the new version of ip_ct_gather_frags available in 2.4.31:

http://svn.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/trunk/patch-o-matic-ng/raw/linux-2.4.patch?rev=3692&view=markup

> -    /* Gather fragments. */
> -    if ((*pskb)->nh.iph->frag_off & htons(IP_MF|IP_OFFSET)) {
> -        *pskb = ip_ct_gather_frags(*pskb,
> -                                   hooknum == NF_IP_PRE_ROUTING ?
> -                                   IP_DEFRAG_CONNTRACK_IN :
> -                                   IP_DEFRAG_CONNTRACK_OUT);
> -        if (!*pskb)
> -            return NF_STOLEN;
> -    }
> 
> but you've replaced it with the old one, that goes in ip_conntrack_defrag:
> 
> +    /* Gather fragments. */
> +    if ((*pskb)->nh.iph->frag_off & htons(IP_MF|IP_OFFSET)) {
> +        *pskb = ip_ct_gather_frags(*pskb);
> +        if (!*pskb)
> +            return NF_STOLEN;
> +    }

The patch in POM then is kind of misleading.

>> ip_conntrack_standalone.c: At top level:
>> ip_conntrack_standalone.c:546: `ip_conntrack_untracked' undeclared
>> here (not ina
>> function)
> 
> 
> The hunk attached below is missing in your patch. You need to declare
> ip_conntrack_untracked as extern in ip_conntrack.h.

I figured something like that but why has it changed and which one is correct
now with respect to 2.4.31?

> -------- missing hunk ----------------
> diff -urN --exclude-from=/usr/src/diff.exclude
> linux-2.4.22-log/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_conntrack.h
> linux-2.4.22-raw/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_conntrack.h
> --- linux-2.4.22-log/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_conntrack.h
> 2003-09-17 17:14:54.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.4.22-raw/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_conntrack.h
> 2003-09-28 14:22:09.000000000 +0200
> @@ -250,6 +250,9 @@
>  /* Call me when a conntrack is destroyed. */
>  extern void (*ip_conntrack_destroyed)(struct ip_conntrack *conntrack);
> 
> +/* Fake conntrack entry for untracked connections */
> +extern struct ip_conntrack ip_conntrack_untracked;
> +
>  extern int ip_ct_no_defrag;
>  /* Returns new sk_buff, or NULL */
>  struct sk_buff *
>  ip_ct_gather_frags(struct sk_buff *skb);
> ------- end of missing hunk ---------------

Thanks, I'll try that.

> Those will fix compilation. No big changes has gone into 2.4/netfilter
> since quite some time, anyway I would need to check this more in deep to
> make sure that everything works like a charm. Re-post a new patch and
> I'll have a look at it again.

I'll see if I can give it a spin. Unfortunately the POM mechanism (mainly the
malfunctioning runme tool) makes it very hard for us here to extract patches.

I need to know how it should be done correctly though. I'm a bit opposed to
ripping out the fragment below from the kernel:

> -    if ((*pskb)->nh.iph->frag_off & htons(IP_MF|IP_OFFSET)) {
> -        *pskb = ip_ct_gather_frags(*pskb,
> -                                   hooknum == NF_IP_PRE_ROUTING ?
> -                                   IP_DEFRAG_CONNTRACK_IN :
> -                                   IP_DEFRAG_CONNTRACK_OUT);
> -        if (!*pskb)
> -            return NF_STOLEN;
> -    }

I my opinion the part above should stay and the POM patch adapted.

Thank you very much for your help. BTW, I haven't forgotten about the nfnetlink
backport thing, it's just stalled here internally due to different priorities.

Regards,
Roberto Nibali, ratz
-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------
addr://Rathausgasse 31, CH-5001 Aarau  tel://++41 62 823 9355
http://www.terreactive.com             fax://++41 62 823 9356
-------------------------------------------------------------
terreActive AG                       Wir sichern Ihren Erfolg
-------------------------------------------------------------

  reply	other threads:[~2005-06-08  8:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-06-07 11:06 [PATCH] update raw patch in POM Roberto Nibali
2005-06-07 14:37 ` Roberto Nibali
2005-06-07 22:55   ` Pablo Neira
2005-06-08  8:23     ` Roberto Nibali [this message]
2005-06-08 12:37       ` Pablo Neira
2005-06-14 15:27         ` Roberto Nibali
2005-06-20  8:18           ` Roberto Nibali
2005-06-20  9:07             ` Roberto Nibali
2005-06-20 10:41             ` SOLVED (was: Re: [PATCH] update raw patch in POM) Roberto Nibali
2005-06-20 11:01               ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2005-06-20 11:03                 ` SOLVED Roberto Nibali
2005-06-20 11:04                   ` SOLVED Jozsef Kadlecsik
2005-06-20 10:49             ` [PATCH] update raw patch in POM Jan Engelhardt
2005-06-20 11:03               ` Roberto Nibali
2005-06-21  0:34             ` Thomas Graf
2005-06-21  0:39               ` Thomas Graf
2005-06-21  6:46                 ` Roberto Nibali
2005-06-21  8:59                   ` Pablo Neira
2005-06-21  9:08                     ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2005-06-21 11:18                   ` Thomas Graf
2005-06-21  0:51               ` Pablo Neira
2005-06-21 11:13                 ` Thomas Graf
2005-06-21 14:00                   ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-21 14:17                     ` [PATCH] update raw patch in POM [2.4.x] Roberto Nibali
2005-06-21 14:47                       ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-21 15:15                         ` Roberto Nibali
2005-06-21 15:32                           ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-22  9:26                             ` Roberto Nibali
2005-06-22  7:04                           ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2005-06-22  9:10                             ` Roberto Nibali
2005-06-22  9:19                               ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2005-06-22  9:27                                 ` Roberto Nibali
2005-06-21 21:50                     ` [PATCH] update raw patch in POM Thomas Graf
2005-06-22  0:32                       ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-22  0:52                         ` Thomas Graf
2005-06-22  3:24                           ` Pablo Neira
2005-06-22  3:55                             ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-22  5:48                               ` Roberto Nibali
2005-06-22 11:39                               ` Roberto Nibali
2005-06-22 18:38                                 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-27  6:36                                   ` Roberto Nibali
2005-06-27 10:57                                     ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-27 12:07                                       ` Roberto Nibali
2005-06-27 12:55                                         ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-27 13:53                                           ` Roberto Nibali
2005-06-27 15:49                                             ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-28  6:02                                               ` Roberto Nibali
2005-06-27  8:50                                   ` Roberto Nibali

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=42A6AB19.2040106@tac.ch \
    --to=ratz@tac.ch \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
    --cc=pablo@eurodev.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.