From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
To: Karim Yaghmour <karim@opersys.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Bill Huey <bhuey@lnxw.com>,
Kristian Benoit <kbenoit@opersys.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paulmck@us.ibm.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, pmarques@grupopie.com, bruce@andrew.cmu.edu,
nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, ak@muc.de, sdietrich@mvista.com,
dwalker@mvista.com, hch@infradead.org, akpm@osdl.org,
rpm@xenomai.org
Subject: Re: PREEMPT_RT vs I-PIPE: the numbers, part 2
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 01:57:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050622235720.GA6200@g5.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42B9F673.4040100@opersys.com>
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 07:38:27PM -0400, Karim Yaghmour wrote:
> Bare in mind here that what we're trying to find out with such
> tests is what is the bare minimum cost of the proposed rt
> enhancements to Linux, and how well do these perform in their
> rt duties, the most basic of which being interrupt latency.
Agreed. I think it makes more sense to keep comparing it against the UP
kernel with preempt disabled, since most embedded devices aren't smp.
> To be honest, however, I have a very hard time, as a user, to
> convince myself that I should enable preempt_rt under any but
> the most dire situations given the results I now have in front
Same here.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-22 23:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-20 17:13 PREEMPT_RT vs I-PIPE: the numbers, part 2 Kristian Benoit
2005-06-20 18:31 ` Bill Huey
2005-06-22 16:00 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-22 19:29 ` Bill Huey
2005-06-22 20:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-22 20:39 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-22 22:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-22 23:03 ` Lee Revell
2005-06-22 23:52 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-22 23:38 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-22 23:57 ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2005-06-23 0:05 ` Daniel Walker
2005-06-23 0:48 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-23 0:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-23 0:47 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-23 0:55 ` Bill Huey
2005-06-23 1:09 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-23 1:15 ` Bill Huey
2005-06-23 1:47 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-23 0:59 ` David Lang
2005-06-23 1:22 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-23 1:42 ` David Lang
2005-06-23 2:09 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-23 2:15 ` David Lang
2005-06-23 1:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-23 2:02 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-23 3:57 ` Lee Revell
2005-06-23 4:13 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-22 20:10 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-22 20:15 ` Bill Huey
2005-06-21 1:55 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-21 2:29 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-22 1:19 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-22 15:31 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-22 15:27 ` Kristian Benoit
2005-06-22 16:27 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-22 17:20 ` Kristian Benoit
2005-06-22 17:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-22 17:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-22 18:12 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-22 18:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-22 19:04 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-22 18:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-22 19:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-22 20:17 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-22 20:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-22 21:03 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-22 21:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-22 21:32 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-22 22:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-22 23:02 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-22 21:20 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-22 19:08 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-23 14:48 ` Paulo Marques
2005-06-22 17:58 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-22 18:47 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-22 19:16 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-22 21:23 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-22 17:17 ` Lee Revell
2005-06-22 17:32 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-29 7:43 ` PREEMPT_RT & threading IRQ 0 Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050622235720.GA6200@g5.random \
--to=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=ak@muc.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=bhuey@lnxw.com \
--cc=bruce@andrew.cmu.edu \
--cc=dwalker@mvista.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=karim@opersys.com \
--cc=kbenoit@opersys.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
--cc=pmarques@grupopie.com \
--cc=rpm@xenomai.org \
--cc=sdietrich@mvista.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.