All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Karim Yaghmour <karim@opersys.com>
To: David Lang <dlang@digitalinsight.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Bill Huey <bhuey@lnxw.com>,
	Kristian Benoit <kbenoit@opersys.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paulmck@us.ibm.com, andrea@suse.de,
	tglx@linutronix.de, pmarques@grupopie.com, bruce@andrew.cmu.edu,
	nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, ak@muc.de, sdietrich@mvista.com,
	dwalker@mvista.com, hch@infradead.org, akpm@osdl.org,
	rpm@xenomai.org
Subject: Re: PREEMPT_RT vs I-PIPE: the numbers, part 2
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 21:22:28 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <42BA0ED4.80207@opersys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0506221753010.16773@qynat.qvtvafvgr.pbz>


David Lang wrote:
> I know that I have a large number of slow (<200MHz) pentiums that are just 
> sitting around at home and could be used for this, but I don't know if 
> they would be considered fast enough for any portions of this test (I have 
> a much smaller number of faster machines that could possibly be used)

I don't think that there should be any limitation on the type of
hardware being tested. In fact, I would think that having as
diverse a test hardware as possible would be a good thing.
Many of the embedded platforms are in fact not that far different
from those slow pentiums you have lying around.

My 0.02$,

Karim
-- 
Author, Speaker, Developer, Consultant
Pushing Embedded and Real-Time Linux Systems Beyond the Limits
http://www.opersys.com || karim@opersys.com || 1-866-677-4546

  reply	other threads:[~2005-06-23  1:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-06-20 17:13 PREEMPT_RT vs I-PIPE: the numbers, part 2 Kristian Benoit
2005-06-20 18:31 ` Bill Huey
2005-06-22 16:00   ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-22 19:29     ` Bill Huey
2005-06-22 20:05       ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-22 20:39         ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-22 22:04           ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-22 23:03             ` Lee Revell
2005-06-22 23:52               ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-22 23:38             ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-22 23:57               ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-06-23  0:05               ` Daniel Walker
2005-06-23  0:48                 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-23  0:06               ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-23  0:47                 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-23  0:55                   ` Bill Huey
2005-06-23  1:09                     ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-23  1:15                       ` Bill Huey
2005-06-23  1:47                         ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-23  0:59                   ` David Lang
2005-06-23  1:22                     ` Karim Yaghmour [this message]
2005-06-23  1:42                       ` David Lang
2005-06-23  2:09                         ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-23  2:15                           ` David Lang
2005-06-23  1:34                   ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-23  2:02                     ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-23  3:57                       ` Lee Revell
2005-06-23  4:13                         ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-22 20:10       ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-22 20:15         ` Bill Huey
2005-06-21  1:55 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-21  2:29   ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-22  1:19     ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-22 15:31       ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-22 15:27         ` Kristian Benoit
2005-06-22 16:27         ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-22 17:20           ` Kristian Benoit
2005-06-22 17:34             ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-22 17:40               ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-22 18:12                 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-22 18:14                   ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-22 19:04                     ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-22 18:50             ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-22 19:04               ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-22 20:17                 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-22 20:22                   ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-22 21:03                     ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-22 21:10                       ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-22 21:32                         ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-22 22:41                       ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-22 23:02                         ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-22 21:20                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-22 19:08               ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-23 14:48             ` Paulo Marques
2005-06-22 17:58           ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-22 18:47             ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-22 19:16               ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-22 21:23                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-22 17:17         ` Lee Revell
2005-06-22 17:32           ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-29  7:43           ` PREEMPT_RT & threading IRQ 0 Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=42BA0ED4.80207@opersys.com \
    --to=karim@opersys.com \
    --cc=ak@muc.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=andrea@suse.de \
    --cc=bhuey@lnxw.com \
    --cc=bruce@andrew.cmu.edu \
    --cc=dlang@digitalinsight.com \
    --cc=dwalker@mvista.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=kbenoit@opersys.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=pmarques@grupopie.com \
    --cc=rpm@xenomai.org \
    --cc=sdietrich@mvista.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.