All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sheo Shanker Prasad <ssp@creativeresearch.org>
To: Philippe Troin <phil@fifi.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Disturbing wide variation in execution time
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2005 14:51:27 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200507081451.27563.ssp@creativeresearch.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87oe9eo3n5.fsf@ceramic.fifi.org>

On Thursday July 7 2005 11:46 am, Philippe Troin wrote:
> Sheo Shanker Prasad <ssp@creativeresearch.org> writes:
> > I will appreciate your help in eliminating a disturbing wide
> > variation (by a factors of 2 to 2.5) in the execution time of a test
> > (execution benchmark) program under identical conditions even when
> > the machine is freshly started (rebooted) and no other user program
> > is running (not even e-mail or Internet browser).
> >
> > I have a dual Opteron 250 (2.4 GHz) running SuSE 9.3 Pro & Linux
> > version 2.6.11.4-21.7-smp (geeko@buildhost) (gcc version 3.3.5
> > 20050117 (prerelease) (SUSE Linux)) #1 SMP Thu Jun 2 14:23:14 UTC
> > 2005. The motherboard is Tyan Thunder K8W (S2885 ANRF) with AMI BIOS
> >
> > The machine has 4GB of PC3200 DDR RAM, two dimms on each CPU.
> >
> > The original machine bought from a vendor about 6 months ago. At
> > that time it was running SuSE 9.1 Pro and the execution time for the
> > same test program was consistently the same (around 2m 37s +/- a few
> > %). Then the mother board failed and the machine went totally
> > dead. The vendor then replaced the failed motherboard with a new
> > Tyan Thunder K8W and installed the SuSE 9.3. I am not sure whether
> > or not the AMI BIOS was also replaced.
> >
> > When the repaired machine was started, I began to notice the
> > disturbing wide variation and the frequect significant slow down of
> > the machine as exhibited by the factor of 2 to 2.5 increased
> > execution time of the test program as described above.  Sometimes it
> > would be quite fast (executing at the original 2m 40s) and sometime
> > a factor of 2.5 slow, and sometimes with speed in between.
>
> 8< snip >8

Thanks very much for your taking time to think about my problem. Here are 
answers to your questions.
>
>  1. Are you running an i386 kernel or an x86_64 kernel?

I think, I am running a x86_64 kernel.  I think so, because I had asked the 
vendor of the machine to install x86_64 and because the file

System.map-2.6.11.4-21.7-smp 

in the /boot directory has an entry: ffffffff804f0000 T x86_64_start_kernel

and that directory also contains the gzipped file:

 symvers-2.6.11.4-21.7-x86_64-smp.gz

The operating system is Linux version 2.6.11.4-21.7-smp (geeko@buildhost)  
(gcc version 3.3.5 20050117 (prerelease) (SUSE Linux)) #1 SMP Thu Jun 2 
14:23:14 UTC 2005
>
>  2. Which BIOS version?

The BIOS is AMIBIOS version is 08.00.10 with the build date of 02/11/05 
09:44:04 and has the ID:  0AAAA001.

>
>  3. Is node interleaving enabled in the BIOS?

When I go through the BIOS setup, I do not see any choice for the node 
interleaving ON or OFF. However, I think that the two CPUs (as node0 and 
node1) are made NUMA aware by default, but I could be quite wrong. 

Out of ignorance, therefore,  the following are the contents of 

 /sys/devices/system/node/node0/numastat &

numa_hit 3620274
numa_miss 0
numa_foreign 0
interleave_hit 21903
local_node 3610298agravaited
other_node 9976

Similarly, following are the  the contents of

  /sys/devices/system/node/node1/numastat

numa_hit 3089426
numa_miss 0
numa_foreign 0
interleave_hit 38355
local_node 3072605
other_node 16821

>
> Phil.

 Thanks again, Phil, and I hope to hear from you soon.
-- 
Best regards.

Sheo
(Sheo S. Prasad)
Creative Research Enterprises
6354 Camino del Lago
Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
Voice Phone: (+1) 925 426-9341
Fax   Phone: (+1) 925 426-9417
e-mail: ssp@CreativeResearch.org


  reply	other threads:[~2005-07-08 21:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-07-07  6:44 Disturbing wide variation in execution time Sheo Shanker Prasad
2005-07-07  7:10 ` David S. Miller
2005-07-07  8:03   ` Sheo Shanker Prasad
2005-07-07  9:53     ` Eric Piel
2005-07-07 18:46 ` Philippe Troin
2005-07-08 21:51   ` Sheo Shanker Prasad [this message]
2005-07-08  0:41 ` michael

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200507081451.27563.ssp@creativeresearch.org \
    --to=ssp@creativeresearch.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=phil@fifi.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.