All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Philippe Troin <phil@fifi.org>
To: Sheo Shanker Prasad <ssp@creativeresearch.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Disturbing wide variation in execution time
Date: 07 Jul 2005 11:46:38 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87oe9eo3n5.fsf@ceramic.fifi.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200507062344.53615.ssp@creativeresearch.org>

Sheo Shanker Prasad <ssp@creativeresearch.org> writes:

> I will appreciate your help in eliminating a disturbing wide
> variation (by a factors of 2 to 2.5) in the execution time of a test
> (execution benchmark) program under identical conditions even when
> the machine is freshly started (rebooted) and no other user program
> is running (not even e-mail or Internet browser).
> 
> I have a dual Opteron 250 (2.4 GHz) running SuSE 9.3 Pro & Linux
> version 2.6.11.4-21.7-smp (geeko@buildhost) (gcc version 3.3.5
> 20050117 (prerelease) (SUSE Linux)) #1 SMP Thu Jun 2 14:23:14 UTC
> 2005. The motherboard is Tyan Thunder K8W (S2885 ANRF) with AMI BIOS
> 
> The machine has 4GB of PC3200 DDR RAM, two dimms on each CPU.
> 
> The original machine bought from a vendor about 6 months ago. At
> that time it was running SuSE 9.1 Pro and the execution time for the
> same test program was consistently the same (around 2m 37s +/- a few
> %). Then the mother board failed and the machine went totally
> dead. The vendor then replaced the failed motherboard with a new
> Tyan Thunder K8W and installed the SuSE 9.3. I am not sure whether
> or not the AMI BIOS was also replaced.
> 
> When the repaired machine was started, I began to notice the
> disturbing wide variation and the frequect significant slow down of
> the machine as exhibited by the factor of 2 to 2.5 increased
> execution time of the test program as described above.  Sometimes it
> would be quite fast (executing at the original 2m 40s) and sometime
> a factor of 2.5 slow, and sometimes with speed in between.

8< snip >8

 1. Are you running an i386 kernel or an x86_64 kernel?

 2. Which BIOS version?

 3. Is node interleaving enabled in the BIOS?

Phil.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-07-07 18:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-07-07  6:44 Disturbing wide variation in execution time Sheo Shanker Prasad
2005-07-07  7:10 ` David S. Miller
2005-07-07  8:03   ` Sheo Shanker Prasad
2005-07-07  9:53     ` Eric Piel
2005-07-07 18:46 ` Philippe Troin [this message]
2005-07-08 21:51   ` Sheo Shanker Prasad
2005-07-08  0:41 ` michael

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87oe9eo3n5.fsf@ceramic.fifi.org \
    --to=phil@fifi.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ssp@creativeresearch.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.