[parisc-linux] nptl build failures (so close!)

[parisc-linux] nptl build failures (so close!)

[Carlos O'Donell]

Randolph, Dave,

Any thoughts?

../sysdeps/generic/strtol_l.c: In function '____strtol_l_internal':
../sysdeps/generic/strtol_l.c:483: warning: cast discards qualifiers from pointer target type
../sysdeps/generic/strtol_l.c:497: error: 'ERANGE' undeclared (first use in this function)
../sysdeps/generic/strtol_l.c:497: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
../sysdeps/generic/strtol_l.c:497: error: for each function it appears in.)
../sysdeps/generic/strtol_l.c:517: warning: cast discards qualifiers from pointer target type
../sysdeps/generic/strtol_l.c:520: warning: cast discards qualifiers from pointer target type
make[2]: *** [/mnt/flaire/src/tls-toolchain-hppa/build/glibc-nptl/stdlib/strtol_l.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/mnt/flaire/src/tls-toolchain-hppa/src/glibc/stdlib'
make[1]: *** [stdlib/subdir_lib] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/mnt/flaire/src/tls-toolchain-hppa/src/glibc'
make: *** [all] Error 2

I tried to debug a weird header file include problem in the nptl headers
last night, but to no avail. It looks like gcc was reordering the includes
and "lll_lock_t" wasn't included. This time around "ERANGE" is missing, but 
if I trace the headers by hand it should have been included.

This looks like an einvironment problem. No other arches seem to define anything
magical to make this work.

I had a similar problem in nptl/descr.h where lowlevellock.h wasn't being
included until after descr.h was entirely processed. Which made no sense
at all.

c.


_______________________________________________
parisc-linux mailing list
parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org
http://lists.parisc-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/parisc-linux

[parisc-linux] Re: nptl build failures (so close!)

[John David Anglin]

> I tried to debug a weird header file include problem in the nptl headers
> last night, but to no avail. It looks like gcc was reordering the includes
> and "lll_lock_t" wasn't included. This time around "ERANGE" is missing, but 
> if I trace the headers by hand it should have been included.

Have you looked at the -E output?  Also, add -dM to see macro defines.

Dave
-- 
J. David Anglin                                  dave.anglin@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca
National Research Council of Canada              (613) 990-0752 (FAX: 952-6602)
_______________________________________________
parisc-linux mailing list
parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org
http://lists.parisc-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/parisc-linux

[parisc-linux] Re: nptl build failures (so close!)

[Carlos O'Donell]

On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 05:10:09PM -0400, John David Anglin wrote:
> > I tried to debug a weird header file include problem in the nptl headers
> > last night, but to no avail. It looks like gcc was reordering the includes
> > and "lll_lock_t" wasn't included. This time around "ERANGE" is missing, but 
> > if I trace the headers by hand it should have been included.
> 
> Have you looked at the -E output?  Also, add -dM to see macro defines.

Ah thanks, I always forget about the -dM to see those cursed macros that
are probably my issue.

The TLS headers are tricky to say the least and more confusing due to
the defines that enable and disable various "Standards."

I'm sure GCC has it's fair share of these problems.

c.

_______________________________________________
parisc-linux mailing list
parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org
http://lists.parisc-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/parisc-linux