* [LARTC] wondershaper query
@ 2005-07-28 19:00 Payal Rathod
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Payal Rathod @ 2005-07-28 19:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
Hello,
I am trying wondershaper-1.1a on a friend's pppoe connection on her
Linux box.
There are a few things I don't understand.
1. She has pppoe connection so should DEV=eth0 or DEV=ppp0 ?
2. Her ISP just says on her payment bill that the speed is 128kbps, but
doesn't mention any downlink/uplink speed, so in that case what should
be,
DOWNLINK= and UPLINK= ?
3. She uses the net in her small office and people mostly to browse the
net, send emails
sometimes ftp data out and sometimes ssh to other servers to trouble
shoot their
programs. In such a case is wondershaper helpful? Or is it not required
at all?
Thanks in advance.
With warm regards,
Payal
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [LARTC] wondershaper query
@ 2005-08-01 4:21 Ow Mun Heng
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ow Mun Heng @ 2005-08-01 4:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 15:00 -0400, Payal Rathod wrote:
> Hello,
> I am trying wondershaper-1.1a on a friend's pppoe connection on her
> Linux box.
> There are a few things I don't understand.
> 1. She has pppoe connection so should DEV=eth0 or DEV=ppp0 ?
Frankly I can't remember. My home box is not with me right now. Why
don't you give each a shot? My bet is it's ppp0. (90% sure)
> 2. Her ISP just says on her payment bill that the speed is 128kbps, but
> doesn't mention any downlink/uplink speed, so in that case what should
> be,
> DOWNLINK= and UPLINK= ?
You can try some online bandwith tests. I like the ones at
nyc.speakeasy.net
bear in mind that 128 may mean both up and dn speed (symmetrical) You
may have to play with the numbers a bit to get it right.
> 3. She uses the net in her small office and people mostly to browse the
> net, send emails
> sometimes ftp data out and sometimes ssh to other servers to trouble
> shoot their
> programs. In such a case is wondershaper helpful? Or is it not required
> at all?
Of course it is useful. This is definitely useful to make
non-interactive activity such as FTP slower then interactive (SSH)
activities so not to feel the lag.
--
Ow Mun Heng
Gentoo/Linux on DELL D600 1.4Ghz 1.5GB RAM
98% Microsoft(tm) Free!!
Neuromancer 12:16:40 up 8 days, 18:28, 5 users, load average: 0.42,
0.30, 0.26
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-08-01 4:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-07-28 19:00 [LARTC] wondershaper query Payal Rathod
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-08-01 4:21 Ow Mun Heng
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.