All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: tony@atomide.com, tuukka.tikkanen@elektrobit.com, ck@vds.kolivas.org
Subject: Re: [patch] i386 dynamic ticks 2.6.13-rc4 (code reordered)
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 15:49:48 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200508021549.48711.kernel@kolivas.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200508021443.55429.kernel@kolivas.org>

On Tue, 2 Aug 2005 02:43 pm, Con Kolivas wrote:
> This has slightly more build fixes than the last one I posted and boots and
> runs fine on my laptop. So far at absolute idle it appears this pentiumM
> 1.7 is claiming to have _25%_ more battery life. I'll need to investigate
> further to see the real power savings.

As a crude data point of idle system running a full kde desktop environment on 
powersave with minimal backlight and just chatting on IRC I find it's just 
under 10% battery life difference. I have confirmed in the past the accuracy 
of the remaining capacity exported by the battery and the time to complete 
discharge. This saving is similar in magnitude to the 1000->100Hz savings of 
7% mentioned on other threads. While nothing like the 25% initially suggested 
it is still significant. Anyone with a more accurate means of testing this 
interested?

Cheers,
Con

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-08-02  5:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-08-02  4:43 [patch] i386 dynamic ticks 2.6.13-rc4 (code reordered) Con Kolivas
2005-08-02  5:35 ` [ck] " Michael Marineau
2005-08-02  5:49 ` Con Kolivas [this message]
2005-08-02  5:52   ` Lee Revell
2005-08-02  5:56     ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-02  6:24       ` Lee Revell
2005-08-02  7:17         ` Tony Lindgren
2005-08-02  7:39           ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-02  8:15             ` Tony Lindgren
2005-08-02 10:54               ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-02 11:31                 ` Tony Lindgren
2005-08-02 12:04                   ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-02  7:21 ` Tony Lindgren
2005-08-02 14:01 ` Avuton Olrich
2005-08-02 14:05   ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-06 14:54 ` Theodore Ts'o
2005-08-06 15:00   ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-08  5:43     ` Stefan Seyfried
2005-08-08 21:54     ` Pavel Machek
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-08-08 18:37 Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2005-08-10  6:44 ` Thomas Renninger
2005-08-10  6:57   ` Con Kolivas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200508021549.48711.kernel@kolivas.org \
    --to=kernel@kolivas.org \
    --cc=ck@vds.kolivas.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=tuukka.tikkanen@elektrobit.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.