From: Stefan Seyfried <seife@suse.de>
To: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
Cc: tony@atomide.com, ck@vds.kolivas.org,
tuukka.tikkanen@elektrobit.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
tytso@mit.edu
Subject: Re: [patch] i386 dynamic ticks 2.6.13-rc4 (code reordered)
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 07:43:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42F6F0E9.1050606@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200508070100.55319.kernel@kolivas.org>
Con Kolivas wrote:
>> When I enabled dynamic tick using:
>>
>> echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/timer/timer0/dyn_tick_state
>>
>> The number of ticks dropped down to 60-70 HZ, bus mastering activity
>> jumpped up to being almost always active,
>
> Anyone know why this would happen?
This is just a guess, without any actual code-reading:
Maybe the C-state decision process just relies on being called every
tick, so "after X ticks with no BM activity, go to next deeper C state".
As long as 1000 ticks per second are coming in, everything is fine and
we enter C[n+1] after X miliseconds without BM activity. Now if there
are only 60-70 ticks per second, you never get X ticks without BM
activity so you never go deeper than C2.
Just a guess.
--
Stefan Seyfried \ "I didn't want to write for pay. I
QA / R&D Team Mobile Devices \ wanted to be paid for what I write."
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Nürnberg \ -- Leonard Cohen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-08 7:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-02 4:43 [patch] i386 dynamic ticks 2.6.13-rc4 (code reordered) Con Kolivas
2005-08-02 5:35 ` [ck] " Michael Marineau
2005-08-02 5:49 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-02 5:52 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-02 5:56 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-02 6:24 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-02 7:17 ` Tony Lindgren
2005-08-02 7:39 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-02 8:15 ` Tony Lindgren
2005-08-02 10:54 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-02 11:31 ` Tony Lindgren
2005-08-02 12:04 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-02 7:21 ` Tony Lindgren
2005-08-02 14:01 ` Avuton Olrich
2005-08-02 14:05 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-06 14:54 ` Theodore Ts'o
2005-08-06 15:00 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-08 5:43 ` Stefan Seyfried [this message]
2005-08-08 21:54 ` Pavel Machek
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-08-08 18:37 Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2005-08-10 6:44 ` Thomas Renninger
2005-08-10 6:57 ` Con Kolivas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42F6F0E9.1050606@suse.de \
--to=seife@suse.de \
--cc=ck@vds.kolivas.org \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=tuukka.tikkanen@elektrobit.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.