From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: Rolf Eike Beer <eike-kernel@sf-tec.de>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Saripalli, Venkata Ramanamurthy (STSD)" <saripalli@hp.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, axboe@suse.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpqfc: fix for "Using too much stach" in 2.6 kernel
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 12:42:59 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050804164259.GD22886@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200508041756.23611@bilbo.math.uni-mannheim.de>
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 05:56:14PM +0200, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 4. August 2005 17:40 schrieb Dave Jones:
> >On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 11:38:30AM +0200, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
> > > >+ ulFibreFrame = kmalloc((2048/4), GFP_KERNEL);
> > >
> > > The size bug was already found by Dave Jones. This never should be
> > > written this way (not your fault). The array should have been
> > > [2048/sizeof(ULONG)].
> >
> >wasteful. We only ever use 2048 bytes of this array, so doubling
> >its size on 64bit is pointless, unless you make changes later on
> >in the driver. (Which I think don't make sense, as we just copy
> >32 64byte chunks).
>
> No, this is how it should have been before. This way it would have been clear
> where the magic 4 came from.
It's pointless to fix this, without fixing also CpqTsGetSFQEntry()
...
> >we're trashing the last 48 bytes of every copy we make.
> >Does this driver even work ?
>
> No, ulDestPtr ist ULONG* so we increase it by sizeof(ULONG)*16 which is 64.
Duh, yes. That is broken on 64-bit however, where it will advance 128 bytes
instead of 64 bytes.
Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-04 16:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-04 4:39 [PATCH 1/2] cpqfc: fix for "Using too much stach" in 2.6 kernel Saripalli, Venkata Ramanamurthy (STSD)
2005-08-04 4:39 ` Saripalli, Venkata Ramanamurthy (STSD)
2005-08-04 4:49 ` Dave Jones
2005-08-04 9:38 ` Rolf Eike Beer
2005-08-04 12:13 ` Denis Vlasenko
2005-08-04 15:40 ` Dave Jones
2005-08-04 15:56 ` Rolf Eike Beer
2005-08-04 16:42 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2005-08-04 17:11 ` Rolf Eike Beer
2005-08-04 17:38 ` Dave Jones
2005-08-04 13:53 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-08-06 1:13 ` Jesper Juhl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050804164259.GD22886@redhat.com \
--to=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=eike-kernel@sf-tec.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=saripalli@hp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.