All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ryan Harper <ryanh@us.ibm.com>
To: shemminger@osdl.org
Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Possible race with br_del_if()
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 16:40:36 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050818214036.GH10593@us.ibm.com> (raw)

Hello,

I've encountered several oops when adding and removing interfaces from
bridges while using Xen.  Most of the details are available [1]here.
The short of it is the following sequence:

CPU0                    CPU1
add_del_if()            unregister_netdevice()  
br_del_if()             notifier_call_chain(NETDEV_UNREGISTER) 
del_nbp()               
br_stp_disable_port()   // port->state == BR_STATE_DISABLED
                        br_device_event() // dev->br_port != NULL yet
                                          // event is NETDEV_UNREGISTER
                        br_del_if()
                        sysfs_remove_dir(p)
                        kobject_del()
                        dget(dentry)
                        BUG_ON(!atomic_read(&dentry->d_count)

This sequence doesn't happen all of the time.  In many cases, CPU0 moves
along right into destroy_nbp() which sets dev->br_port = NULL, and
be_device_event check (p == NULL) hits and a second br_del_if() isn't
called.

The attached patch is a workaround for the double case, but I'm not sure
if is the right way to deal with this issue, or if it any issue at all.

1. http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90

-- 
Ryan Harper
Software Engineer; Linux Technology Center
IBM Corp., Austin, Tx
(512) 838-9253   T/L: 678-9253
ryanh@us.ibm.com


diffstat output:
 br_if.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Signed-off-by: Ryan Harper <ryanh@us.ibm.com>
---
Simple workaround for double call to br_del_if().

Signed-off-by: Ryan Harper <ryanh@us.ibm.com>

--- linux-2.6.12/net/bridge/br_if.c	2005-06-17 14:48:29.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.12-xen0-smp/net/bridge/br_if.c	2005-08-18 15:17:27.302615846 -0500
@@ -382,7 +382,7 @@
 {
 	struct net_bridge_port *p = dev->br_port;
 	
-	if (!p || p->br != br) 
+	if (!p || p->br != br || p->state == BR_STATE_DISABLED)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	br_sysfs_removeif(p);

             reply	other threads:[~2005-08-18 21:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-08-18 21:40 Ryan Harper [this message]
2005-08-18 22:12 ` Possible race with br_del_if() Stephen Hemminger
2005-08-18 22:23   ` Ryan Harper
2005-08-18 22:35     ` Stephen Hemminger
2005-08-18 22:56       ` Ryan Harper
2005-08-19 19:10       ` Ryan Harper
2005-08-19 19:40         ` Stephen Hemminger
2005-10-11 20:33 ` [PATCH] br: fix race on bridge del if Stephen Hemminger
2005-10-12 22:10   ` David S. Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050818214036.GH10593@us.ibm.com \
    --to=ryanh@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=shemminger@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.