From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>
To: Robert Scott <rbscott@axentra.net>
Cc: bridge@lists.osdl.org
Subject: Re: [Bridge] unregister_netdevice: waiting for br0 to become free. Usage count = 1 (2.6.12.3)
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 21:37:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050831213749.6bc8dd50@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8189B9F5-DF6E-4032-8D2D-D5301A02A081@axentra.net>
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 19:04:01 -0700
Robert Scott <rbscott@axentra.net> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I know that this bug has been discussed before at length on this
> mailing list, but previous post seemed to indicate that it was fixed
> before kernel 2.6.12. I am still seeing this occasionally in kernel
> 2.6.12.3. The system is running knoppix, and IPV6 is not compiled
> into the kernel(other posts mentioned numerous problems with the IPV6
> code). But every so often, when bringing down the bridge (it doesn't
> happen every time), the process hangs, and the following message
> appears in dmesg repeatedly:
>
> 'unregister_netdevice: waiting for br0 to become free. Usage count = 1'
>
> None of the processes involved can be killed, and an attempt to run
> an ifconfig results in a process that is also waiting forever. At
> this point the box must be rebooted forcefully.
>
> Two questions.
> 1. In a previous post, someone mentioned one solution was to
> commenting out the check that is hanging in the kernel. Does this
> check preventing something terrible from happening(i assumed that it
> does), or is it safe to remove it
Really bad idea, because if the thing that is holding the reference
like packets stuck in some dead queue, ever get processed the kernel
will die.
> 2. Any ideas of something to try in order to make this repeatable?
Two other recent reports are:
1. Buggy applications that hold packets in their input queue forever,
and/or netfilters. The socket buffer's contain a reference for
packets in flight.
2. The VLAN code had a number of reference bugs, if you look through
recent netdev mailing list you will see the discussion.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-01 4:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-01 2:04 [Bridge] unregister_netdevice: waiting for br0 to become free. Usage count = 1 (2.6.12.3) Robert Scott
2005-09-01 4:26 ` Ben Greear
2005-09-01 4:37 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2005-09-01 5:12 ` Ben Greear
2005-09-01 6:33 ` Robert Scott
2005-09-01 16:24 ` Stephen Hemminger
2005-09-01 19:04 ` Patrick McHardy
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-09-02 7:37 Louis Croisez
2015-06-26 12:04 Jorge Dominguez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050831213749.6bc8dd50@localhost.localdomain \
--to=shemminger@osdl.org \
--cc=bridge@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=rbscott@axentra.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.