From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Robert Scott <rbscott@axentra.net>
Cc: bridge@lists.osdl.org
Subject: Re: [Bridge] unregister_netdevice: waiting for br0 to become free. Usage count = 1 (2.6.12.3)
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 21:26:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <431682F3.2030103@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8189B9F5-DF6E-4032-8D2D-D5301A02A081@axentra.net>
Robert Scott wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I know that this bug has been discussed before at length on this
> mailing list, but previous post seemed to indicate that it was fixed
> before kernel 2.6.12. I am still seeing this occasionally in kernel
> 2.6.12.3. The system is running knoppix, and IPV6 is not compiled into
> the kernel(other posts mentioned numerous problems with the IPV6
> code). But every so often, when bringing down the bridge (it doesn't
> happen every time), the process hangs, and the following message
> appears in dmesg repeatedly:
>
> 'unregister_netdevice: waiting for br0 to become free. Usage count = 1'
I have found an appearant leak of a route object, which holds a reference
to a device. I reproduced in both 2.6.11 and 2.6.13 using 802.1Q VLANs.
I have a patch that will print out the place of the leaked reference
against 2.6.13.
http://www.candelatech.com/oss/rfcnt.patch
Enable the feature in the Networking section of Kconfig.
If you can reproduce with this patch in place, you will get a file and line number
for the leak..please CC me. I'm going to try to debug the leak, but I
could definately use some help...
> None of the processes involved can be killed, and an attempt to run an
> ifconfig results in a process that is also waiting forever. At this
> point the box must be rebooted forcefully.
>
> Two questions.
> 1. In a previous post, someone mentioned one solution was to commenting
> out the check that is hanging in the kernel. Does this check
> preventing something terrible from happening(i assumed that it does),
> or is it safe to remove it.
This would be bad...could lead to memory corruption.
> 2. Any ideas of something to try in order to make this repeatable?
I have a complex application with a complex script to drive it that reproduces
the problem within an hour...I haven't found a simpler way....
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-01 4:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-01 2:04 [Bridge] unregister_netdevice: waiting for br0 to become free. Usage count = 1 (2.6.12.3) Robert Scott
2005-09-01 4:26 ` Ben Greear [this message]
2005-09-01 4:37 ` Stephen Hemminger
2005-09-01 5:12 ` Ben Greear
2005-09-01 6:33 ` Robert Scott
2005-09-01 16:24 ` Stephen Hemminger
2005-09-01 19:04 ` Patrick McHardy
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-09-02 7:37 Louis Croisez
2015-06-26 12:04 Jorge Dominguez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=431682F3.2030103@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=bridge@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=rbscott@axentra.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.