From: Rolf Eike Beer <eike-kernel@sf-tec.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: jejb@steeleye.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] fix EH thread teardown
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2005 16:01:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200509071601.38164@bilbo.math.uni-mannheim.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050907135105.GA16340@lst.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1138 bytes --]
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>As Rolf Eike Beer noted we might not actually get to the
>kthread_should_stop() because we are waiting in the semaphore forever.
>I didn't get a rmmod hang because of this, but my instrumentation showed
>the thread defitiyly didn't exit.
>
>So make sure to wake the EH thread before the kthread_stop, and to plug
>the reaming race check kthead_should_stop() a second time just before
>calling down_interruptible().
>
>
>Index: scsi-misc-2.6/drivers/scsi/hosts.c
>===================================================================
>--- scsi-misc-2.6.orig/drivers/scsi/hosts.c 2005-09-07 14:21:44.000000000
> +0200 +++ scsi-misc-2.6/drivers/scsi/hosts.c 2005-09-07 14:22:33.000000000
> +0200 @@ -226,8 +226,10 @@
> struct Scsi_Host *shost = dev_to_shost(dev);
> struct device *parent = dev->parent;
>
>- if (shost->ehandler)
>+ if (shost->ehandler) {
>+ up(shost->eh_wait);
> kthread_stop(shost->ehandler);
>+ }
> if (shost->work_q)
> destroy_workqueue(shost->work_q);
Wouldn't this hang the same way if rescheduling happens between the up() and
the kthread_stop()?
Eike
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-07 14:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-07 13:51 [PATCH 1/2] fix EH thread teardown Christoph Hellwig
2005-09-07 14:01 ` Rolf Eike Beer [this message]
2005-09-08 15:26 ` Rolf Eike Beer
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-09-13 16:50 Alan Stern
2005-09-13 17:01 ` Rolf Eike Beer
2005-09-13 19:03 ` Alan Stern
2005-09-13 19:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-09-13 20:57 ` Alan Stern
2005-09-14 16:24 ` Alan Stern
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200509071601.38164@bilbo.math.uni-mannheim.de \
--to=eike-kernel@sf-tec.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jejb@steeleye.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.