From: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
To: akpm@osdl.org
Cc: dwmw2@infradead.org, bunk@stusta.de, johnstul@us.ibm.com,
drepper@redhat.com, Franz.Fischer@goyellow.de,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [UPDATE PATCH][Bug 5132] fix sys_poll() large timeout handling
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2005 17:35:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050910003525.GC24225@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050906212514.GB3038@us.ibm.com>
On 06.09.2005 [14:25:14 -0700], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> On 31.08.2005 [13:01:09 -0700], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > Sorry everybody, forgot the most important Cc: :)
> >
> > -Nish
> >
> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> > In looking at Bug 5132 and sys_poll(), I think there is a flaw in the
> > current code.
> >
> > The @timeout parameter to sys_poll() is in milliseconds but we compare
> > it to (MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT / HZ), which is jiffies/jiffies-per-sec or
> > seconds. That seems blatantly broken. Also, I think we are better served
> > by converting to jiffies first then comparing, as opposed to converting
> > our maximum to milliseconds (or seconds, incorrectly) and comparing.
> >
> > Comments, suggestions for improvement?
>
> I haven't got any responses (here or on the bug)... A silent NACK?
> Anything I should change to make people happier?
Well, I found one thing to change. msecs_to_jiffies() deals in unsigned
quantities while the parameter we are passing in is signed (and with
reason). I mistakenly left the
if (timeout)
check in, when it should be
if (timeout > 0)
check. Fixed below.
Thanks,
Nish
Description: The current sys_poll() implementation does not seem to
handle large timeouts correctly. Any value in milliseconds (@timeout)
which exceeds the maximum representable jiffy value
(MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT) should result in a MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT
schedule_timeout() request. To achieve this, convert @timeout to jiffies
first, then compare to MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT.
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
---
fs/select.c | 17 ++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff -urpN 2.6.13/fs/select.c 2.6.13-dev/fs/select.c
--- 2.6.13/fs/select.c 2005-08-28 17:46:14.000000000 -0700
+++ 2.6.13-dev/fs/select.c 2005-09-09 17:22:30.000000000 -0700
@@ -469,13 +469,16 @@ asmlinkage long sys_poll(struct pollfd _
if (nfds > current->files->max_fdset && nfds > OPEN_MAX)
return -EINVAL;
- if (timeout) {
- /* Careful about overflow in the intermediate values */
- if ((unsigned long) timeout < MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT / HZ)
- timeout = (unsigned long)(timeout*HZ+999)/1000+1;
- else /* Negative or overflow */
- timeout = MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT;
- }
+ if (timeout > 0)
+ /*
+ * Convert the value from msecs to jiffies - if overflow
+ * occurs we get a negative value, which gets handled by
+ * the next block
+ */
+ timeout = msecs_to_jiffies(timeout) + 1;
+ if (timeout < 0) /* Negative requests result in infinite timeouts */
+ timeout = MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT;
+ /* 0 case falls through */
poll_initwait(&table);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-10 0:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-31 20:01 [PATCH][Bug 5132] fix sys_poll() large timeout handling Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-09-06 21:25 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-09-10 0:35 ` Nishanth Aravamudan [this message]
2005-09-10 1:16 ` [UPDATE PATCH][Bug " Andrew Morton
2005-09-10 2:23 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-09-10 2:36 ` Andrew Morton
2005-09-10 2:55 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-09-12 14:30 ` Peter Staubach
2005-09-12 15:05 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-09-12 15:19 ` Peter Staubach
2005-09-12 16:06 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050910003525.GC24225@us.ibm.com \
--to=nacc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=Franz.Fischer@goyellow.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=drepper@redhat.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.