All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Staubach <staubach@redhat.com>
To: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	dwmw2@infradead.org, bunk@stusta.de, johnstul@us.ibm.com,
	drepper@redhat.com, Franz.Fischer@goyellow.de,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [UPDATE PATCH][Bug 5132] fix sys_poll() large timeout handling
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 11:19:32 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <43259C84.5020209@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050912150541.GA25471@us.ibm.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1045 bytes --]

Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:

>
>I don't think the embedded folks are going to be ok with adding a 64-bit
>div in the poll() common-path... But otherwise the patch looks pretty
>sane, except I think you want s64, not int64_t? I can't ever remember
>myself :)
>  
>

Oops, I missed an include which is required.  The updated patch is attached.

A 64 bit quantity divided by a 32 bit quantity seems to be a standard
interface in the kernel and is used fairly widely, so I suspect that
the embedded folks have already done the work.

I don't know which should be used, s64 or int64_t.  I chose int64_t
because then it would (more or less) match the interface of do_div().

>I agree the interface mght be mis-defined. And changing timeout_msecs()
>to an integer is consistent with the size of millisecond-unit variables
>used elsewhere in the kernel.
>

Yes, it also makes the kernel definition for sys_poll() match the user level
definition for poll(2) found in <poll.h>.

    Thanx...

       ps

Signed-off-by: Peter Staubach <staubach@redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #2: select.devel --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2111 bytes --]

--- linux-2.6.13/fs/select.c.org	2005-08-28 19:41:01.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.13/fs/select.c	2005-09-12 11:11:53.000000000 -0400
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
 #include <linux/fs.h>
 
 #include <asm/uaccess.h>
+#include <asm/div64.h>
 
 #define ROUND_UP(x,y) (((x)+(y)-1)/(y))
 #define DEFAULT_POLLMASK (POLLIN | POLLOUT | POLLRDNORM | POLLWRNORM)
@@ -457,25 +458,34 @@ static int do_poll(unsigned int nfds,  s
 	return count;
 }
 
-asmlinkage long sys_poll(struct pollfd __user * ufds, unsigned int nfds, long timeout)
+asmlinkage long sys_poll(struct pollfd __user * ufds, unsigned int nfds, int timeout_msecs)
 {
 	struct poll_wqueues table;
  	int fdcount, err;
  	unsigned int i;
 	struct poll_list *head;
  	struct poll_list *walk;
+	long timeout;
+	int64_t lltimeout;
 
 	/* Do a sanity check on nfds ... */
 	if (nfds > current->files->max_fdset && nfds > OPEN_MAX)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	if (timeout) {
-		/* Careful about overflow in the intermediate values */
-		if ((unsigned long) timeout < MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT / HZ)
-			timeout = (unsigned long)(timeout*HZ+999)/1000+1;
-		else /* Negative or overflow */
+	if (timeout_msecs) {
+		if (timeout_msecs < 0)
 			timeout = MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT;
-	}
+		else {
+			lltimeout = (int64_t)timeout_msecs * HZ + 999;
+			do_div(lltimeout, 1000);
+			lltimeout++;
+			if (lltimeout > MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT)
+				timeout = MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT;
+			else
+				timeout = (long)lltimeout;
+		}
+	} else
+		timeout = 0;
 
 	poll_initwait(&table);
 
--- linux-2.6.13/include/linux/syscalls.h.org	2005-08-28 19:41:01.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.13/include/linux/syscalls.h	2005-09-12 10:22:25.000000000 -0400
@@ -420,7 +420,7 @@ asmlinkage long sys_socketpair(int, int,
 asmlinkage long sys_socketcall(int call, unsigned long __user *args);
 asmlinkage long sys_listen(int, int);
 asmlinkage long sys_poll(struct pollfd __user *ufds, unsigned int nfds,
-				long timeout);
+				int timeout_msecs);
 asmlinkage long sys_select(int n, fd_set __user *inp, fd_set __user *outp,
 			fd_set __user *exp, struct timeval __user *tvp);
 asmlinkage long sys_epoll_create(int size);

  reply	other threads:[~2005-09-12 15:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-08-31 20:01 [PATCH][Bug 5132] fix sys_poll() large timeout handling Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-09-06 21:25 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-09-10  0:35   ` [UPDATE PATCH][Bug " Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-09-10  1:16     ` Andrew Morton
2005-09-10  2:23       ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-09-10  2:36         ` Andrew Morton
2005-09-10  2:55           ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-09-12 14:30             ` Peter Staubach
2005-09-12 15:05               ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-09-12 15:19                 ` Peter Staubach [this message]
2005-09-12 16:06                   ` Nishanth Aravamudan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=43259C84.5020209@redhat.com \
    --to=staubach@redhat.com \
    --cc=Franz.Fischer@goyellow.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=bunk@stusta.de \
    --cc=drepper@redhat.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nacc@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.