From: Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>
To: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] Re: [PATCH 11/12] HPPFS: add dentry_ops->d_revalidate
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 20:07:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200510062007.32365.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050921034416.GW7992@ftp.linux.org.uk>
On Wednesday 21 September 2005 05:44, Al Viro wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 04:10:07PM +0200, Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso
wrote:
> > +static int hppfs_d_revalidate(struct dentry * dentry, struct nameidata *
> > nd) +{
> > + int (*d_revalidate)(struct dentry *, struct nameidata *);
> > + struct dentry *proc_dentry;
> > +
> > + proc_dentry = HPPFS_I(dentry->d_inode)->proc_dentry;
> > + if (proc_dentry->d_op && proc_dentry->d_op->d_revalidate)
> > + d_revalidate = proc_dentry->d_op->d_revalidate;
> > + else
> > + return 1; /* "Still valid" code */
> > +
> > + return (*d_revalidate)(proc_dentry, nd);
> > +}
>
> Ahem... Guess what that will do with negative dentry?
Was missing the very first line (dentry->d_inode). I just saw you already
suggested returning 0 for them, which I'm gonna do anyway.
But, actually, procfs returns ENOENT (or EINVAL) rather than creating negative
dentries (at least, I've examined most of procfs lookup funcs, hope I haven't
missed any)...
And actually, after realizing the procfs trick, I see that we, too should miss
negative dentries, because on the "uncached" path when we get an error like
that we propagate that, and on the "cached" one obviously we can't find them
in dcache.
Right?
I'll do the check for negative dentries anyway because depending on procfs
details is not on my TODO list.
Yes, we could, but given the unmaintainance level of HPPFS, nobody would ever
fix it when needed, and that's not recommended.
--
Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!".
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade (Skype ID "PaoloGiarrusso", ICQ 215621894)
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade
___________________________________
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB
http://mail.yahoo.it
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>
To: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] Re: [PATCH 11/12] HPPFS: add dentry_ops->d_revalidate
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 20:07:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200510062007.32365.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050921034416.GW7992@ftp.linux.org.uk>
On Wednesday 21 September 2005 05:44, Al Viro wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 04:10:07PM +0200, Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso
wrote:
> > +static int hppfs_d_revalidate(struct dentry * dentry, struct nameidata *
> > nd) +{
> > + int (*d_revalidate)(struct dentry *, struct nameidata *);
> > + struct dentry *proc_dentry;
> > +
> > + proc_dentry = HPPFS_I(dentry->d_inode)->proc_dentry;
> > + if (proc_dentry->d_op && proc_dentry->d_op->d_revalidate)
> > + d_revalidate = proc_dentry->d_op->d_revalidate;
> > + else
> > + return 1; /* "Still valid" code */
> > +
> > + return (*d_revalidate)(proc_dentry, nd);
> > +}
>
> Ahem... Guess what that will do with negative dentry?
Was missing the very first line (dentry->d_inode). I just saw you already
suggested returning 0 for them, which I'm gonna do anyway.
But, actually, procfs returns ENOENT (or EINVAL) rather than creating negative
dentries (at least, I've examined most of procfs lookup funcs, hope I haven't
missed any)...
And actually, after realizing the procfs trick, I see that we, too should miss
negative dentries, because on the "uncached" path when we get an error like
that we propagate that, and on the "cached" one obviously we can't find them
in dcache.
Right?
I'll do the check for negative dentries anyway because depending on procfs
details is not on my TODO list.
Yes, we could, but given the unmaintainance level of HPPFS, nobody would ever
fix it when needed, and that's not recommended.
--
Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!".
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade (Skype ID "PaoloGiarrusso", ICQ 215621894)
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade
___________________________________
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB
http://mail.yahoo.it
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-06 19:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-18 14:10 [uml-devel] [PATCH 11/12] HPPFS: add dentry_ops->d_revalidate Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso
2005-09-18 14:10 ` Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso
2005-09-21 3:44 ` [uml-devel] " Al Viro
2005-09-21 3:44 ` Al Viro
2005-10-06 18:07 ` Blaisorblade [this message]
2005-10-06 18:07 ` [uml-devel] " Blaisorblade
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200510062007.32365.blaisorblade@yahoo.it \
--to=blaisorblade@yahoo.it \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.