From: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <glommer@br.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@cam.ac.uk>,
glommer@br.ibm.com, mikulas@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp,
linux-ntfs-dev@lists.sourceforge.net, aia21@cantab.net,
hch@infradead.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use of getblk differs between locations
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 21:07:34 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051011000734.GC13399@br.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051010163648.3e305b63.akpm@osdl.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1425 bytes --]
Andrew,
I'm providing a patch that puts the test in some more or less trivial
cases.
Maybe putting them in -mm tree could give them the test environment they
need.
But even if the patch gets in, there are still some cases that I don't
feel comfortable with right now to fix.
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 04:36:48PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@cam.ac.uk> wrote:
> >
> > > Maybe the best solution is neither one nor another. Testing and failing
> > > gracefully seems better.
> > >
> > > What do you think?
> >
> > I certainly agree with you there. I neither want a deadlock nor
> > corruption. (-:
>
> Yup. In the present implementation __getblk_slow() "cannot fail". It's
> conceivable that at some future stage we'll change __getblk_slow() so that
> it returns NULL on an out-of-memory condition. Anyone making such a change
> would have to audit all callers to make sure that they handle the NULL
> correctly.
>
> It is appropriate at this time to fix the callers so that they correctly
> handle the NULL return. However, it is non-trivial to actually _test_ such
> changes, and such changes should be tested. Or at least, they should be
> done with considerable care and knowledge of the specific filesystems.
>
--
=====================================
Glauber de Oliveira Costa
IBM Linux Technology Center - Brazil
glommer@br.ibm.com
=====================================
[-- Attachment #2: patch_test_getblk --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 5116 bytes --]
diff -Naurp linux-2.6.14-rc2-orig/fs/affs/affs.h linux-2.6.14-rc2-cleanp/fs/affs/affs.h
--- linux-2.6.14-rc2-orig/fs/affs/affs.h 2005-06-17 19:48:29.000000000 +0000
+++ linux-2.6.14-rc2-cleanp/fs/affs/affs.h 2005-10-10 22:28:30.000000000 +0000
@@ -230,6 +230,8 @@ affs_getzeroblk(struct super_block *sb,
pr_debug("affs_getzeroblk: %d\n", block);
if (block >= AFFS_SB(sb)->s_reserved && block < AFFS_SB(sb)->s_partition_size) {
bh = sb_getblk(sb, block);
+ if (!bh)
+ return NULL;
lock_buffer(bh);
memset(bh->b_data, 0 , sb->s_blocksize);
set_buffer_uptodate(bh);
@@ -245,6 +247,8 @@ affs_getemptyblk(struct super_block *sb,
pr_debug("affs_getemptyblk: %d\n", block);
if (block >= AFFS_SB(sb)->s_reserved && block < AFFS_SB(sb)->s_partition_size) {
bh = sb_getblk(sb, block);
+ if (!bh)
+ return NULL;
wait_on_buffer(bh);
set_buffer_uptodate(bh);
return bh;
diff -Naurp linux-2.6.14-rc2-orig/fs/bfs/file.c linux-2.6.14-rc2-cleanp/fs/bfs/file.c
--- linux-2.6.14-rc2-orig/fs/bfs/file.c 2005-09-26 13:58:15.000000000 +0000
+++ linux-2.6.14-rc2-cleanp/fs/bfs/file.c 2005-10-10 21:58:23.000000000 +0000
@@ -33,6 +33,8 @@ static int bfs_move_block(unsigned long
if (!bh)
return -EIO;
new = sb_getblk(sb, to);
+ if (!new)
+ return -EIO;
memcpy(new->b_data, bh->b_data, bh->b_size);
mark_buffer_dirty(new);
bforget(bh);
diff -Naurp linux-2.6.14-rc2-orig/fs/ext2/inode.c linux-2.6.14-rc2-cleanp/fs/ext2/inode.c
--- linux-2.6.14-rc2-orig/fs/ext2/inode.c 2005-09-26 13:58:15.000000000 +0000
+++ linux-2.6.14-rc2-cleanp/fs/ext2/inode.c 2005-10-10 22:31:12.000000000 +0000
@@ -440,6 +440,8 @@ static int ext2_alloc_branch(struct inod
* the pointer to new one, then send parent to disk.
*/
bh = sb_getblk(inode->i_sb, parent);
+ if (!bh)
+ break;
lock_buffer(bh);
memset(bh->b_data, 0, blocksize);
branch[n].bh = bh;
diff -Naurp linux-2.6.14-rc2-orig/fs/ext3/inode.c linux-2.6.14-rc2-cleanp/fs/ext3/inode.c
--- linux-2.6.14-rc2-orig/fs/ext3/inode.c 2005-10-09 20:26:54.000000000 +0000
+++ linux-2.6.14-rc2-cleanp/fs/ext3/inode.c 2005-10-10 22:38:05.000000000 +0000
@@ -532,6 +532,8 @@ static int ext3_alloc_branch(handle_t *h
*/
bh = sb_getblk(inode->i_sb, parent);
branch[n].bh = bh;
+ if (!bh)
+ break;
lock_buffer(bh);
BUFFER_TRACE(bh, "call get_create_access");
err = ext3_journal_get_create_access(handle, bh);
@@ -864,7 +866,7 @@ struct buffer_head *ext3_getblk(handle_t
if (!*errp && buffer_mapped(&dummy)) {
struct buffer_head *bh;
bh = sb_getblk(inode->i_sb, dummy.b_blocknr);
- if (buffer_new(&dummy)) {
+ if (bh && buffer_new(&dummy)) {
J_ASSERT(create != 0);
J_ASSERT(handle != 0);
diff -Naurp linux-2.6.14-rc2-orig/fs/minix/itree_common.c linux-2.6.14-rc2-cleanp/fs/minix/itree_common.c
--- linux-2.6.14-rc2-orig/fs/minix/itree_common.c 2005-06-17 19:48:29.000000000 +0000
+++ linux-2.6.14-rc2-cleanp/fs/minix/itree_common.c 2005-10-10 22:59:31.000000000 +0000
@@ -84,6 +84,8 @@ static int alloc_branch(struct inode *in
break;
branch[n].key = cpu_to_block(nr);
bh = sb_getblk(inode->i_sb, parent);
+ if (!bh)
+ break;
lock_buffer(bh);
memset(bh->b_data, 0, BLOCK_SIZE);
branch[n].bh = bh;
diff -Naurp linux-2.6.14-rc2-orig/fs/reiserfs/journal.c linux-2.6.14-rc2-cleanp/fs/reiserfs/journal.c
--- linux-2.6.14-rc2-orig/fs/reiserfs/journal.c 2005-09-26 13:58:16.000000000 +0000
+++ linux-2.6.14-rc2-cleanp/fs/reiserfs/journal.c 2005-10-10 22:44:31.000000000 +0000
@@ -2120,7 +2120,7 @@ static int journal_read_transaction(stru
le32_to_cpu(commit->
j_realblock[i - trans_half]));
}
- if (real_blocks[i]->b_blocknr > SB_BLOCK_COUNT(p_s_sb)) {
+ if (real_blocks[i] && real_blocks[i]->b_blocknr > SB_BLOCK_COUNT(p_s_sb)) {
reiserfs_warning(p_s_sb,
"journal-1207: REPLAY FAILURE fsck required! Block to replay is outside of filesystem");
goto abort_replay;
diff -Naurp linux-2.6.14-rc2-orig/fs/reiserfs/stree.c linux-2.6.14-rc2-cleanp/fs/reiserfs/stree.c
--- linux-2.6.14-rc2-orig/fs/reiserfs/stree.c 2005-09-01 14:26:04.000000000 +0000
+++ linux-2.6.14-rc2-cleanp/fs/reiserfs/stree.c 2005-10-10 22:56:14.000000000 +0000
@@ -664,7 +664,7 @@ int search_by_key(struct super_block *p_
have a pointer to it. */
if ((p_s_bh = p_s_last_element->pe_buffer =
sb_getblk(p_s_sb, n_block_number))) {
- if (!buffer_uptodate(p_s_bh) && reada_count > 1) {
+ if (p_s_sb && !buffer_uptodate(p_s_bh) && reada_count > 1) {
search_by_key_reada(p_s_sb, reada_bh,
reada_blocks, reada_count);
}
diff -Naurp linux-2.6.14-rc2-orig/fs/sysv/itree.c linux-2.6.14-rc2-cleanp/fs/sysv/itree.c
--- linux-2.6.14-rc2-orig/fs/sysv/itree.c 2005-06-17 19:48:29.000000000 +0000
+++ linux-2.6.14-rc2-cleanp/fs/sysv/itree.c 2005-10-10 22:41:35.000000000 +0000
@@ -144,6 +144,8 @@ static int alloc_branch(struct inode *in
*/
parent = block_to_cpu(SYSV_SB(inode->i_sb), branch[n-1].key);
bh = sb_getblk(inode->i_sb, parent);
+ if (!bh)
+ break;
lock_buffer(bh);
memset(bh->b_data, 0, blocksize);
branch[n].bh = bh;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-10 23:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-10 20:45 [PATCH] Use of getblk differs between locations Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2005-10-10 21:20 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2005-10-10 21:46 ` Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2005-10-10 21:58 ` Mikulas Patocka
2005-10-10 22:25 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2005-10-10 22:49 ` Mikulas Patocka
2005-10-10 23:12 ` Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2005-10-10 23:16 ` Mikulas Patocka
2005-10-10 23:33 ` Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2005-10-10 23:33 ` Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2005-10-10 23:34 ` Mikulas Patocka
2005-10-10 23:34 ` Mikulas Patocka
2005-10-10 23:49 ` Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2005-10-11 7:52 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2005-10-12 19:51 ` Jeff Mahoney
2005-10-12 19:59 ` Mikulas Patocka
2005-10-12 20:07 ` Jeff Mahoney
2005-10-12 20:12 ` Mikulas Patocka
2005-10-12 20:14 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2005-10-12 20:31 ` Mikulas Patocka
2005-10-12 21:19 ` Jeff Mahoney
2005-10-12 21:35 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2005-10-14 11:32 ` Al Boldi
2005-10-13 0:09 ` Jamie Lokier
2005-10-13 0:21 ` Mikulas Patocka
2005-10-13 0:27 ` Jamie Lokier
2005-10-13 11:17 ` Pavel Machek
2005-10-14 16:52 ` Jamie Lokier
2005-10-14 16:52 ` Jamie Lokier
2005-10-14 18:26 ` Mikulas Patocka
2005-10-13 0:05 ` Jamie Lokier
2005-10-12 20:08 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2005-10-10 22:36 ` Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2005-10-10 22:28 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2005-10-10 23:36 ` Andrew Morton
2005-10-11 0:07 ` Glauber de Oliveira Costa [this message]
2005-10-11 0:05 ` Al Viro
2005-10-11 0:40 ` Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2005-10-11 12:35 ` Jan Hudec
2005-10-11 0:09 ` Mikulas Patocka
2005-10-11 1:07 ` Andrew Morton
2005-10-11 1:20 ` Mikulas Patocka
2005-10-11 5:02 ` Andrew Morton
2005-10-11 5:02 ` Andrew Morton
2005-10-11 8:07 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2005-10-11 8:01 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2005-10-13 0:58 ` Mike Christie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051011000734.GC13399@br.ibm.com \
--to=glommer@br.ibm.com \
--cc=aia21@cam.ac.uk \
--cc=aia21@cantab.net \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ntfs-dev@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=mikulas@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.